* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Improved Hybrid Amplifier Efficiency Using SiGe
Electric power system wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Scattering parameters wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
Wireless power transfer wikipedia , lookup
Electrification wikipedia , lookup
Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup
Power inverter wikipedia , lookup
Power engineering wikipedia , lookup
Power over Ethernet wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Amtrak's 25 Hz traction power system wikipedia , lookup
Solar micro-inverter wikipedia , lookup
Two-port network wikipedia , lookup
Distribution management system wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
IEEE BCTM 7.2 Improved Hybrid SiGe HBT Class-AB Power Amplifier Efficiency Using Varactor-Based Tunable Matching Networks W.C.E. Neo X. Liui, Y. Lini, L.C.N. de Vreedel, L.E. Larson, M. Spirito, A. Akhnoukh', A. de Graauw3, and L.K. Nanver' 1DIMES, Delft University of Technology, Feldmannweg 17, 2628 CT, Delft, The Netherlands, 2University of California at San Diego UCSD, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA 3Philips Semiconductors, Gerstweg 2,6534 AE, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Abstract: This paper presents a 1.8GHz prototype class-AB power amplifier using a QUBIC4G (SiGe, ft=40GHz) handset device with adaptive inand output matching networks. The realized amplifier provides: 13dB gain, 28 dBm output power, with an efficiency greater than 33-51% over a 10dB output power control range. I. INTRODUCTION The power amplifier stage in a mobile handset is considered to be one of the most power hungry components. As a result, the talk-time of a typical handset is restricted to several hours by the limited power amplifier (PA) efficiency and battery performance. There are two basic constraints for a mobile system that are responsible for this limitation: - The maximum output power required, related to transmitted power, when the handset is operated at a far distance from the base-station. - The high linearity requirement of a modern wireless communication system, which translates to a power back-off condition of several dB's for the output stage. The high linearity requirement of modem communication standards typically requires the use of class-AB operation for the output stage [1], which provides a workable compromise between linearity and efficiency. When considering the linearity, the class-AB output stage must be dimensioned so that it provides its peak-output power without saturation. As a result, for a given peak-output power (Ppeak) and battery voltage (VYC), the load impedance at the fundamental frequency is fixed: RL= 0.5. Unfortunately, class-AB operation provides only its highest efficiency under maximum drive conditions. When operated at the required back-off level for linearity reasons, a dramatic loss in efficiency occurs. Furthermore, the efficiency of the Class-AB amplifier is even lower when the amplifier is operated at "average" output power levels in a CDMA environment [1]. It is for these reasons that improving amplifier efficiency, while maintaining linearity, is a currently a major research topic in wireless communications. Vjj2Plpak. 0-7803-9309-01051$20.00 @2005 IEEE Most of these efforts are focused on improving the device or amplifier linearity up to compression, in this way the output stage can be operated closer to the compression point yielding a higher efficiency. Examples include the use of harmonic or out-of-band terminations [2] or digital pre-distortion [3]. Although effective, these methods are less effective when the handset PA is used in low-output power mode. Techniques that address this mode are dynamic biasing [4] or regulation of the supply voltage of the output stage [5]. Dynamic biasing provides only modest improvements in efficiency, and supply voltage regulation requires an efficient dc-to-dc conversion, increasing system cost and complexity. An alternative for improved class-AB efficiency is load-line adjustment as function of output power using an adaptive or reconfigurable output matching network. Typically, such a network is based on PINdiode or PHEMT switching of matching elements like inductors, transmission-lines or capacitors. In addition, MEMS capacitors are currently being considered for this application although they still have manufacturing and reliability constraints. An altemative approach is to use varactor diodes to continuously tune the impedance of a matching network [6]. Recent work [7], demonstrated ultra-low loss (Q>100@2GHz) ultra-low distortion anti-series configured varactor diodes which can act as nearideal tuning elements [8]. By using a customized silicon-on-glass technology, these varactor topologies were used to implement two continuous-tunable matching networks, which provide low-loss and lowdistortion and a 1:10 impedance transformation range [9]. In this paper we present for the first time, a complete amplifier with reconfigurable input and output matching networks based on high performance varactors. The resulting amplifier provides an efficiency of greater than 31-55% over a 10dB output power control range, the total size of the amplifier is less then 10mm2. II. OPTIMUM LOADING CONDITONS For an ideal Class-B amplifier, when both V, and RL are fixed, the collector efficiency decreases linearly with the square root of the RF power [10]. As 108 IEEE BCTM 7.2 a result the ideal class-B efficiency will drop from 78.5% to 24.8% for a 10dB power back-off condition. However, the efficiency can be dramatically improved by applying adaptive matching at the output. For example, the load-line can be adjusted in such a way that the voltage amplitude at the collector always equals the bias voltage (Vcc), which will yield the maximum class-B efficiency of 78.5% for a single tone excitation, even under reduced output power conditions. If the loading impedance is changed dynamically with the envelope of the modulated signal, high efficiency can be also achieved for modulated signals with a high peak-to-average signal power ratio. Fig. 1. Block diagram schematic ofimplemented power amplifier circuit (a) -^ To I ... 10j- 3. 0- 0 206 27 209 2 _-PWAMu Lbonwwre In Out C- ,I - (a) 4 2 .0,kndhconmId load 19 20 21 22 23 24 (b) III. PA and RECONFIGURABLE MATCHING NETWORKS The principle schematic is given in Fig. 1., which consists of an active device embedded in a tunable input- and output matching network. At the input a simple tunable LC configuration is used as pre-match for the active device. A two-stage LC-ladder topology has been utilized for the outputmatching network. All the tunable capacitors are composed out of an anti-series configuration of two varactors (Fig. 3), which form a so-called varactor stack (VS). A high ohmic resistor and two diodes in anti-parallel configuration have been used to realize sufficiently high impedance for the VS center tap, in order to avoid linearity degradation for narrow tone spacings [7]. Each VS is independently controlled through its center-tap voltage to achieve the desired capacitance variation and impedance transformation. Since uniformly doped varactors have been used for the VS, the capacitance tuning range is limited in this case to Cma,/Cmin<2.5 for the applied RF signal conditions. The optimized values of the inductances and the zero-bias capacitance of the varactors are given in Table 1. The related matching network achieves an impedance transformation ratio > 10 with varactor control voltages less than 15 volts. Input Matching Network 1I I I 12I - performed, where the QUBIC4G device was modeled with Mextram. For each input power level we obtain the load impedance that provides the maximum efficiency and give the related output power (Fig 2). As can be observed, a 10dB power output range can be achieved using only a relative limited change in loading impedance. Output Matching Network 30 Fig. 2. a) Optimum loading trajectory for maximum efficiency as function of output power. b) efficiency and gain for the optimum loading trajectory. When considering the PA configuration of Fig.1 the maximum output power delivered to the load network is set by the supply voltage V,, and loading condition FL. For an ideal PA (without output capacitance and resistance) the optimum loading is purely resistive and decreases with increasing output power (Fig. 2.). For a real device, however, the presence of output parasitics complicates the determination of the optimal load for a given power level. To solve this, load-pull simulations were (b) Fig. 3. (a) Schematic of input matching network (b) Schematic of output matching network 0.3nH LI LI C1l 36pF L2 l 1.2nH C2 36 F Table 1. Component valuesfor the output matching network. 109 IEEE BCTM 7.2 IV. IMPLEMENTATION A microphotograph of the hybrid amplifier is shown in Fig. 4. For the active device we have used a twoWatt SiGe, QUBIC4G transistor with a fT of 40 GHz [11]. Both the input and output matching network (Fig. 2) are implemented using the TU Delft siliconon-glass technology, which has been customized for the implementation of ultra low-loss high performance varactors (Q>100@2GHz). By using these varactors in an anti-series configuration, a tunable capacitor with extremely low distortion is realized [7]. The inductors were implemented using bond-wires to facilitate some additional adjustment of the inductances values as well. To have an estimate of the degradation in the overall power efficiency due to the losses in the output matching network, we have performed a simulation using an ideal class-B device and the measured s-parameter values of the output matching network. In Fig. 6a the efficiency traces of the ideal class-B amplifier for different output loading conditions as function of output power are given assuming a loss-less matching network. In Fig. 6b this simulation has been repeated but now taking in account the measured losses of the adaptive outputmatching network. As consequence of the losses in the output matching network the efficiency decrease approximately 12% at high output power levels (30dBm) and 30% at 10dB back-off (20dBm). 120 V. MEASUREMENTS - Ideak Matching 02- Adaptive matching network: First we have separately characterized the adaptive output matching network using s-parameter measurements. Fig. 5(a) gives the measured rL provided by the output matching network. As can be concluded from Fig. 5(a), the optimum loading conditions for the QUBIC device for various output power levels (as plotted in Fig. 2(a)) are sufficiently covered by the tuning range of the adaptive output network. Note that the matching network has a relatively low-loss (0.7 dB) at small input impedances; at higher input impedances the losses tend to increases (Fig. 5b). This behavior is a result of the optimization procedure used for the tuning range of the matching network, which was focused on achieving low-Q conditions (low-losses) in the ladder network for high signal powers (low- c 2o- dtoutput R | 40 0 (a) 10 5 15 25 20 30 a5 30 35 Output Power in cErm 100 Remized Output M:tch 30 c 40- 20 (b) 0 10 5 15 25 20 Output Power in crBm Fig. 6. Computed power efficiency of an ideal ClassB amplifier with (a) ideal matching network and (b) with our matching network ss .. 80 14 45 0 40: pig. u rower amptinjer wirn reconjiguraore in- ana output matching network 12 : EfXX 102 j3O 25 02 _ QU0 = dCin bf: 20 _Omam i 1t 10 17 It/ c. a) Smith chart coverage 1p, of b) Loss Fig. contours of our tunable output matching network 19 21 23 25 Oitpta powr (dit* 27 29 Fig. 7. Measured gain and efficiency of the power amplifier circuit in the high-power mode. Amplifier measurements: Swept power single-tone measurements have been performed at various settings of the varactor stack control voltages. Fig. 7 shows both the gain and collector efficiency for the high output power mode, with 28 dBm maximum 110 IEEE BCTM 7.2 VI. CONCLUSION In this work we have designed and implemented a RFPA operating at 1.8GHz using low-loss lowdistortion reconfigurable in- and output matching networks, which facilitates high efficiency over a large power back-off range. Although not reported in this paper, future versions of the presented amplifier are in principle capable to handle antenna miss-match conditions, band-switching or provide even a good starting point for dynamic loadline concepts [12], where the envelop of the modulated signal is used to modify the load impedance, yielding high efficiency even for signals with a large peak-to-average power ratio. Consequently, its compact size, low cost, flexibility, and high performance making it an interesting option for application in future handsets. output power with a maximum efficiency of 51%. Using the previously measured s-parameters of the output-matching network we were able to reasonably predict the required control voltages for providing the optimum efficiency loading conditions for lower output power levels (Figure 8). The device was biased in class-AB operation while the input network was tuned for a conjugate match. It can be noted from Fig. 8 that an efficiency greater than 33-51% over a 10dB output power control range is achieved. We observe that just as predicted from simulations the efficiency traces move left from maximum power setting (O trace) to a low power setting (+ trace). Consequently, if we link all peak efficiency points for the different settings of the output matching network together; we are able to visualize the efficiency improvement of our power amplifier circuit over classical static matching solutions (Figure 9). Note the more than 15% improvement, which is basically a doubling of the initial power efficiency in back-off. D: . ........................................................... ................................................ 50 [1.5,12.5] [2.3,10.3] .7] 45 503110 [3]2 ~~~~~.................... . . . .................................... [3,6.5] e [2.5,8 VII. REFERENCES [1] J. Deng et al, "A High Average-Efficiency SiGe HBT Power Amplifier for WCDMA Handset Applications, " IEEE Trans. on Microwave Theory and Techniques, Vol. 53, Issue: 2, Feb. 2005 pp.529-537 [2] M. van der Heijden et al, "On the optimum biasing and input out-of-band terminations of linear and power efficient class-AB bipolar RF amplifiers," IEEE Bipolar and BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting, pp.44-47, Sept. 2004. [3] R. Marsalek et al,"From post-distortion to pre-distortion for power amplifiers linearization," IEEE Communications Letters, Vol. 7, Issue: 7, pp. 308-3 10, July 2003 [4] A. Khanifar, "Enhancement of power amplifier efficiency through dynamic bias switching," IEEE MIT-S International Symposium Digest, Vol.3, pp.2047-2050, June2004. [5] G. Grillo et al, "Adaptive biasing for UMTS power amplifiers," in Proc. IEEE Bipolar and BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting, pp. 1 88-191, Sept. 2004. [6] Yumin Lu et al, "A MEMS reconfigurable matching network for a class AB amplifier," IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, Vol. 13, Issue: 10, pp. 437439, Oct. 2003. [7] K. Buisman, et al., "'Distortion Free' varactor diode topologies for RF adaptivity", To be published in IMS 2005. [8] R.G. Meyer et al., "Distortion in Variable Capacitance Diodes," IEEE JSSC, vol.Sc-10, no. 1 Feb 1975 [9] K. Buisman et al, "Low-Distortion, Low-Loss Varactorbased Adaptive Matching Networks, Implemented in a Silicon-on-Glass Technology," To be published in RFIC 2005 [10] S. Cripps, RF Power Amplifier for Wireless Communication. Boston, MA: Artech House, 1999. [ 1] http://www.semiconductors.philips.com/ [12] F.H. Raab, "High-efficiency linear amplification by dynamic load modulation," 2003 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, Vol.3, pp. 1717-1720, June 2003. ..................... ...................... ..................... .------- ----------...... ... ........./@ .......... [5,5] [735] - 35o 25 20 -/----------...... 12 16 14 20 18 22 26 24 29 30 Output Power (dBm) Fig. 8. Measured Gain and Efficiency of the Power Amplifier Circuit at various output matching network settings. Legend shows the control voltages of the varactor at the device and at the load-side respectively. DD . ....................I......... .. c Fixed Matching Network 0. o Reconfigurable Matching 45 -Network .. ........... ........ .1 E 15 ... .;..,. 010 25- 12 /- 14 16 -sr -- X 18 20 24 22 Output Power (dBm) 26 28 30 Fig. 9. Collector efficiency improvement with the reconfigurable power amplifier circuit 111