* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Spring 2016 - PHYS1211 Impulse, Linear Momentum, and the Law of
Inertial frame of reference wikipedia , lookup
Specific impulse wikipedia , lookup
Relativistic mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Equations of motion wikipedia , lookup
Classical central-force problem wikipedia , lookup
Modified Newtonian dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Work (physics) wikipedia , lookup
Classical mechanics wikipedia , lookup
Spring 2016 - PHYS1211 Impulse, Linear Momentum, and the Law of Conservation of Linear Momentum (Dr. Andrei Galiautdinov, UGA) Introducing momentum A quantity that characterizes the moving object. It captures both aspects of object’s motion: mv This guy may have a few things to say about momentum… Dynamical aspect: how difficult it is to change object’s velocity Kinematical aspect: how fast and in which direction the object is moving Momentum has its own conservation law! A bit of history… Galileo (1564-1642) 1600 Newton (1643-1727) 17th Century 1687 1700 The impulse-momentum theorem It all boils down to re-writing Newton’s 2nd Law in the form which explicitly takes into account the finite duration of the action of the net force. The Impulse-Momentum Theorem It all boils down to re-writing Newton’s 2nd Law in the form that explicitly takes into account the finite duration of the action of the net force. Calculus-based approach: 5 6 It might be easier to think about impulse delivered by a variable force in terms of the same impulse delivered by some constant average force. This is how it is done in algebrabased class. 7 The Impulse-Momentum Theorem It all boils down to re-writing Newton’s 2nd Law in the form that explicitly takes into account the finite duration of the action of the net force. Algebra-based approach: 8 9 The Impulse-Momentum Theorem So we have: But I like to write it differently: I = mv f - mvi mv f = mvi + I The I.M.T. tells us how momentum of a particular object participating in the interaction changes. Let’s look at it more closely… pi = mvi The Impulse-Momentum Theorem We have: But I like to write it differently: I = mv f - mvi mv f = mvi + I I pi = mvi The Impulse-Momentum Theorem We have: But I like to write it differently: I = mv f - mvi mv f = mvi + I pf = mv f pi = mvi I Forces come from interactions IMPORTANT: Forces come from interactions, which means that… …in any impulse delivery, apart from the object “receiving” the impulse, there is always another object, the agent, which “delivers” that impulse (and vice versa!) Interaction involving a single object is like one-hand clapping. IT NEVER HAPPENS! The LCLM Derivation of the LCLM mA v′A = mA v A + FAB ⋅ ∆t mB v′B = mB v B + FBA ⋅ ∆t FBA ⋅ ∆t FAB ⋅ ∆t mA v A A mB v B B mA v′A after (primed) mB v′B The LCLM mA v′A mA v A A mB v′B mB v B before (unprimed) B mB v B mA v A Derivation of the LCLM Derivation of the LCLM after (primed) mB v′B = mB v B + FBA ⋅ ∆t mB v B mB v′B FBA ⋅ ∆t mB v B A before (unprimed) B PAUSE! Derivation of the LCLM mA v′A = mA v A + FAB ⋅ ∆t mA v′A mA v A FAB ⋅ ∆t mA v A A B Derivation of the LCLM mA v′A = mA v A + FAB ⋅ ∆t mA v′A FAB ⋅ ∆t mA v A A mB v′B = mB v B + FBA ⋅ ∆t mA v A Now add the final momenta and notice that FBA ⋅ ∆t mB v B ( FAB ⋅ ∆t = − FBA ⋅ ∆t B ) mA v′A Once again, to recapitulate: after (primed) mB v′B mA v′A mA v A A mB v′B mB v B before (unprimed) B mB v B mA v A For the LCLM to hold, the system must be closed! That means that: 1. The colliding objects interact solely with each other and are not acted upon by anything external. (Or, if the interaction with the outside world is happening, all external forces must add up to zero.) 2. No material is added to or taken away from the system during the experiment. Intuitively we feel it should be like that! On the other hand, here are some very fun things that could (and most likely will) ruin your chances at seeing the LCLM in action: •Pushing or pulling on either body during the collision. •Doing your collision experiment on a table covered with honey. •Pouring cement on top of the objects (say, carts on the air track) while they undergo a collision. •.............................. (Millions of others. Invent your own!) 23 Some old slides in case you find them useful… 24 Completely inelastic collisions (objects get stuck together) 25 26 1D Magnetic recoil demonstrated… … and, hopefully, everything went well... RECOIL IN ACTION: Recoil (Case 1: both objects are initially at rest) 28 29 After: 30 After: 31 Recoil (Case 2: both objects are initially moving together) 32 A recoil example. A person jumps off the back of the moving cart. 33 Another recoil example. This time a person jumps forward: Same concept, different context: pilot ejects from a vertically moving spacecraft: 34 I forgot to take the pic with numbers inserted. Do on your own. 35 Completely elastic collisions (a special kind of collisions in which total kinetic energy is conserved!) 36 The goal is to derive the formulas on the bottom of page. 37 Completely elastic collisions (Case 1: cart B is initially at rest) Only this case is needed for the test. 38 39 Completely elastic collisions (Case 2: both A & B are moving) Not needed for test. 40 41 Extra slides A note on masses Mass is a measure of the inertial property of a given object (how “difficult” it is to change that object’s velocity). Possible operational definition of mass: We define the ratio of two masses by the inverse ratio of the accelerations experienced by the “masses” when they are subjected to equal forces: mA aA ≡ mB aB −1 So we don’t even need the force scale. All we need is the criterion for “equality” of two forces (say, “spring stretched by same amount,” etc.) a aA aB FA = FB mA aA ≡ mB aB −1 F 2 = 1 −1 = 1 2 From Newton’s Laws to the LCLM ∆P ? =0 ∆t after mA v′A mB v B mB v′B mA v A before From Newton’s Laws to the LCLM ∆P ? =0 ∆t ∆P (mA v′A + mB v′B ) − (mA v A + mB v B ) = ∆t ∆t after mA v′A mB v B mB v′B mA v A before From Newton’s Laws to the LCLM ∆P ? =0 ∆t ∆P (mA v′A + mB v′B ) − (mA v A + mB v B ) = ∆t ∆t v′A − v A v′B − v B ∆P = mA + mB ∆t ∆t ∆t after mA v′A mB v B mB v′B mA v A before From Newton’s Laws to the LCLM ∆P ? =0 ∆t ∆P (mA v′A + mB v′B ) − (mA v A + mB v B ) = ∆t ∆t v′A − v A v′B − v B ∆P = mA + mB ∆t ∆t ∆t ∆v B ∆P ∆v A = mA + mB ∆t ∆t ∆t after mA v′A mB v B mB v′B mA v A before From Newton’s Laws to the LCLM ∆P ? =0 ∆t ∆P ∆t ∆P ∆t ∆P ∆t ∆P ∆t ( mA v′A + mB v′B ) − (mA v A + mB v B ) = ∆t v′A − v A v′B − v B = mA + mB ∆t ∆t ∆v A ∆v B = mA + mB ∆t ∆t = mA aA + mB aB after mA v′A mB v B mB v′B mA v A before From Newton’s Laws to the LCLM ∆P ? =0 ∆t ∆P (mA v′A + mB v′B ) − (mA v A + mB v B ) = ∆t ∆t ... ∆P = mA aA + mB aB ∆t after mA v′A mB v′B this is what we have so far… mB v B mA v A before From Newton’s Laws to the LCLM ∆P ? =0 ∆t ∆P (mA v′A + mB v′B ) − (mA v A + mB v B ) = ∆t ∆t ... ∆P = mA aA + mB aB ∆t ∆P = Fnet A + Fnet B (if 2 nd NL is true) ∆t after mA v′A mB v′B ( ) ( ) mB v B mA v A before From Newton’s Laws to the LCLM ∆P ? =0 ∆t ∆P ∆t ... ∆P ∆t ∆P ∆t ∆P ∆t ( mA v′A + mB v′B ) − (mA v A + mB v B ) = ∆t after mA v′A = mA aA + mB aB ( ) ( )B = Fnet A + Fnet = FAB + FBA mB v′B (if 2 nd NL is true) (if system is closed) mB v B mA v A before From Newton’s Laws to the LCLM ∆P ? =0 ∆t ∆P ∆t ... ∆P ∆t ∆P ∆t ∆P ∆t ∆P ∆t ( mA v′A + mB v′B ) − (mA v A + mB v B ) = ∆t after mA v′A = mA aA + mB aB ( ) ( )B = Fnet A + Fnet = FAB + FBA ( mB v′B (if 2 nd NL is true) (if system is closed) ) = FAB + − FAB (if 3rd NL is true) mB v B mA v A before From Newton’s Laws to the LCLM ∆P ? =0 ∆t ∆P ∆t ... ∆P ∆t ∆P ∆t ∆P ∆t ∆P ∆t ∆P ∆t ( mA v′A + mB v′B ) − (mA v A + mB v B ) = ∆t after mA v′A = mA aA + mB aB ( ) ( )B = Fnet A + Fnet = FAB + FBA ( (if 2 nd NL is true) (if system is closed) ) = FAB + − FAB (if 3rd NL is true) =0 mB v′B mB v B mA v A before From Newton’s Laws to the LCLM ∆P ? =0 ∆t ∆P (mA v′A + mB v′B ) − (mA v A + mB v B ) = ∆t ∆t v′A − v A v′B − v B ∆P + mB = mA ∆t ∆t ∆t ∆v ∆v ∆P = mA A + mB B ∆t ∆t ∆t ∆P = mA aA + mB aB ∆t ∆P = Fnet A + Fnet B (if 2 nd NL is true) ∆t ∆P = FAB + FBA (if system is closed) ∆t ∆P = FAB + − FAB (if 3rd NL is true) ∆t ∆P =0 ∆t after mA v′A mB v′B ( ) ( ) ( ) mB v B mA v A before The End 55