Download William A. Niskanen POLITICAL GUIDANCE ON MONETARY POLICY

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Nominal rigidity wikipedia , lookup

Real bills doctrine wikipedia , lookup

Non-monetary economy wikipedia , lookup

Economic bubble wikipedia , lookup

Fiscal multiplier wikipedia , lookup

Modern Monetary Theory wikipedia , lookup

Inflation wikipedia , lookup

Business cycle wikipedia , lookup

Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative easing wikipedia , lookup

Money wikipedia , lookup

Deflation wikipedia , lookup

International monetary systems wikipedia , lookup

Helicopter money wikipedia , lookup

Monetary policy wikipedia , lookup

Money supply wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
POLITICAL GUIDANCE ON MONETARY POLICY
William A. Niskanen
price oi commoumues (lepenus on ooum uemanu anu suppmy conui-
tions, and a price rule can lead to considerable instability in other
markets. The long experience with the several types of gold standards, for example, included several short periods ofinflation caused
by major gold discoveries, long periods of deflation, frequent recessions, and the Great Depression. The primary value of the gold
I
I
I-
_—-.-_---__l
,,_____J,12__,
J_tIl2
.
_.
_
~--1_
I
me rcianonsnip netween cnanges in totam uemanu aimu cnanges in
the money supply is roughly stable, but the rela~onshipbetween
the levels of these conditions is not stable. In technical terms, this
relationship appears to be difference-stable but not trend-stable.1
The most important implication of these findings is that a stable
growth of the money supply will not lead to a stable growth of total
IL:
~
,L.:~...1r,
~
[.3-
.uuwm hut
luau
tU
au vul Sc
illunchal
y
pulley
iii
u
espouse
Lu
U1ICX~
pectcd—either favorable or unfavorable—changes in supply condilions. Similarly, a demand rule is superior to a money rule because
it accommodates unexpected changes in the demand for money. For
these reasons, I suggest that implementation ofa demand rule is the
most appropriate next step for U.S. monetary policy.
150111 wrwaru—uoouuuig aucmluLl marKets, S RUII
as time su veram
lirsL S Liv—
gested by Manuel Johnson (1988), to determine whether there is a
likely change in the relation between changes in final demand and
the monetary base. I am intm-igued by this suggestion, but I am not
yet convinced that one can improve on the type of adaptive rule
suggested by Bennett McCallunm (1984) that is based on the historical
lI
1 iL
1.
jL~.,1 i-iL
~
1~1
sustain the recovery, to reduce inflation, to reduce interest rates, to
mccllicc the uncmploymmicnt rate, to strengthen or weaken the dollar,
to finance time government debt, or whatever.
Omme of the most important lessons of political economy is that a
government must have at least as many policy instruments as it has
goals. The Fed has only one policy instrument, specifically the level