Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Database POPULATION AGEING AND PENSION REFORM Table 2 Public spending on old-age pensions, 2000 and 2050 in percent of GDP Population ageing is a world-wide phenomenon. Ageing patterns in terms of absolute levels as well as rates of change differ substantially across country groups, however. France Italy Germany Belgium Sweden Switzerland Japan Netherlands Canada USA UK While old-age dependency ratios are and will be the highest in the (rich) G10 countries (23 percent and 42 percent respectively), the increase in the ratio (1.8) in these countries until 2050 will be relatively moderate (Table 1). In contrast, China, Latin America and India will exhibit much larger increases in their old-age dependency ratios. It is only Africa that has and will continue to have relatively low old-age dependency ratios. World G10 China Latin America India Africa 11 23 11 9 8 6 25 42 37 29 22 10 change in % 12.1 14.2 11.8 9.0 9.2 7.2 7.9 5.2 4.7 4.4 5.0 14.5 14.4 13.8 13.0 10.8 10.8 8.5 8.3 6.4 6.2 5.6 19.8 1.5 17.0 44.4 17.4 50.0 7.6 59.6 36.2 40.9 12.0 The list of countries was arranged according to the probable level of public spending in 2050. France, Italy and Germany rank highest and would have to spend around 14 percent of GDP on their pensioners, while the figures for Canada, US and UK are much less dramatic. However, the relative increase in public spending on old-age pensions is more pronounced in the countries at the lower than in those at the upper end of the list. In recent years, governments have reacted to the challenge posed by ageing and have initiated major reforms of their pension systems (Table 3). Not shown in Table 3 are the many systemic changes with regard to statutory retirement age, access to early retirement and methods of benefit indexation. Table 1 Old-age dependency ratios and their change for groups of countries 2005 and 2050 (age group 65 + years in percent of age group 15–64 years) 2050 2050 Source: OECD (2005). Within the group of G10 countries, there are also large differences (not shown in Table 1). In 2005, the old-age dependency ratios, with an average of 23 percent (Table 1), range from about 18 percent (US) to 30 percent (Japan and Italy). This range is set to widen considerably and will spread from 34 percent (US) to about 70 percent (Italy and Japan), averaging 42 percent in 2050 (Table 1). 2005 2000 Simulation models show that the reforms conducted up to now will not be sufficient. However, a further increase of the already high contribution rates in some countries will have adverse effects on the labour market. Thus, a further reduction in the replacement level is a major way out. In order to avoid serious repercussions with respect to the standard of living of pensioners, private retirement saving must be increased. As Table 4 shows, assets of private pension funds have already increased remarkably – albeit only in some countries. 2050 in relation to 2005 2.3 1.8 3.4 3.2 2.8 1.7 Source: United Nations (2005). Without any (further) reforms of the pension systems (mainly with regard to benefit levels, contribution rates and retirement age) and without changes in gender participation rates, immigration and productivity trends, public spending on pensions in rich countries will probably increase considerably. A recent article in Financial Market Trends (OECD 2005) has collected related forecasts for a number of OECD countries (Table 2). While assets of private pension funds, as a percentage of GDP, are low and stagnating in some countries (Germany, Italy and Sweden), they are much higher and have developed dynamically in other countries (UK, Canada, the Netherlands, Switzerland, US). R. O. 55 CESifo DICE Report 1/2006 Database Table 3 Recent pension reforms Belgium Canada France Germany Italy Japan Netherlands Sweden Switzerland Date of last major reform Changed level of benefits 1997 1997 2003 2001 2004 2004 2004 1998 2003 reduction no reduction reduction defined benefits: abolished reduction reduction defined benefits: abolished reduction Changed level of contribution rates – increase increase increase no increase increase no no Source: OECD (2005). Table 4 Assets of private pension funds, 1990 and 2001 in percent of GDP Germany Italy Sweden Belgium Japan Canada US UK Netherlands Switzerland 1990 2001 Change in percentage points 3 3 2 2 12 29 42 50 72 56 3 4 4 6 19 48 63 66 105 114 0 1 2 4 7 19 21 16 33 58 Source: OECD (2005). References OECD (2005), “Ageing and Pension System Reform”, Financial Market Trends, Supplement 1. United Nations (2005), World Population Prospects. CESifo DICE Report 1/2006 56 Present level of replacement rate Present level of contribution rate 41 43 53 46 79 50 68 65 58 16.4 9.9 16.5 19.5 32.7 18.3 28.1 18.9 23.8