Download EE25 RJIT PAPER

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Decibel wikipedia , lookup

Spark-gap transmitter wikipedia , lookup

Stepper motor wikipedia , lookup

Electronic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Topology (electrical circuits) wikipedia , lookup

Power engineering wikipedia , lookup

Ohm's law wikipedia , lookup

Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup

Current source wikipedia , lookup

History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup

P–n diode wikipedia , lookup

Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup

Triode wikipedia , lookup

Power MOSFET wikipedia , lookup

Integrating ADC wikipedia , lookup

Metadyne wikipedia , lookup

Schmitt trigger wikipedia , lookup

Rectifier wikipedia , lookup

Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Surge protector wikipedia , lookup

Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup

Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup

Distribution management system wikipedia , lookup

Alternating current wikipedia , lookup

Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup

Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup

Buck converter wikipedia , lookup

Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup

Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup

Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup

Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup

Islanding wikipedia , lookup

Solar micro-inverter wikipedia , lookup

Power inverter wikipedia , lookup

Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622
International
Conference On Emerging Trends in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (ICETMEE- 13th-14th March
2014)
RESEARCH ARTICLE
OPEN ACCESS
A Reduced Devices for 9-level Multi-level inverter with different
Modulation techniques using Reversing Voltage Topology
*, Ravi Yadav, **, Praveen Bansal
*, Department of Electrical Engineering
Madhav Institute of Technology & Science Gwalior, India
[email protected]
**, Department of Electrical Engineering
Madhav Institute of Technology & Science Gwalior, India
[email protected]
ABSTRACT
Use of multilevel inverters has become popular in recent years for high-power high-voltage applications and
their performance is better to that of conventional two-level inverters due to higher number of dc voltage
sources, reduced harmonic distortion and lower EMI. Various topologies and modulation strategies have been
investigated for utility and drive applications in this paper. This paper proposed a new multi-level inverter
topology is called Reversing Voltage with Phase opposition disposition PWM technique. A proposed carrier
based pulse-width modulation strategy for multi-level inverter topology is used to produce nine-level output
voltage in single-phase and it also requires less number of components as compared to other multi-level inverter
topologies. However, multi-level inverter has some disadvantages such as increased number of components,
complex pulse-width modulation controlling method, and voltage-balancing problem. Finally simulation result
of a new multi-level inverter topology is presented with phase opposition disposition PWM technique in singlephase nine-level.
Keywords—Multi-level inverter, RV topology and PWM technique.
I.
INTRODUCTION
In recent years multi-level inverters have
been widely available for high-power high-voltage
applications such as uninterruptible power supplies,
flexible ac transmission systems, and HVDC. Where
as conventional two-level inverter have some
limitations in high-power high-voltage applications
due to switching losses and power ratings [1-2].
Basically this power conversion is provided more
than two voltage levels to achieve smoother and less
distorted dc to ac power conversion. A desired output
voltage waveform can be synthesized from the
multiple voltage levels with less distortion, less
switching frequency and higher efficiency. To obtain
a quality output voltage waveform they require high
switching frequency along with different pulse-width
modulation strategies [3]. Advantages of multi-level
inverter when compared with the conventional
inverter; improves the output voltage waveform,
reduced voltage stress on the load and also decreases
electromagnetic interference problems, and it has
some disadvantages such as complex PWM
controlling method, voltage balancing problem and it
requires higher number of semiconductor switches.
Lower voltage rated switches can be used in multiRustamji Institute of Technology
level inverter instead of higher number of
semiconductor switches which minimizes cost of the
semiconductor switches as compared to two level
inverters [4].
An equivalent representation of one phase
leg of inverters with different levels shown in figure
1, and power semiconductors is represented by an
ideal switch with several positions [3].
Vc
Vc
-
-
a
n
n
a
+
Vc
Vc
(a)
a
n
+
-
+
Vc
+Vc
-
+
+
-
(b)
+
Vc
-
(c)
Fig. 1 one phase leg of inverter (a) two level (b) three
level (c) n-levels
136 | P a g e
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622
International
Conference On Emerging Trends in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (ICETMEE- 13th-14th March
2014)
In particular, multilevel inverters allow the
operation at higher dc voltages using semiconductor
switches connected in series and produce voltage
waveforms with better harmonic profile than
conventional two-level inverters [5]. There are three
main topologies of multilevel inverters: neutral pointclamped, flying capacitors (capacitor clamped), and
cascaded H-bridge. In 1981 Nabae introduced a three
level diode clamped inverter schemes [6]. In neutralpoint-clamped inverter the dc-link is separate into
number of smaller voltage levels using a bank of
series connected bulk capacitors. The seriesconnected H-bridge topology of multilevel inverters
has been used for induction motor drives and it
requires separate DC supply for all three phases,
which increases the power circuit complexity [7].
In this paper a new multilevel inverter topology is
proposed is called Reversing Voltage (RV). The
Reversing Voltage topology that was previously
proposed [8] here is implemented in single-phase
nine-level inverter with phase opposition disposition
PWM. A Phase opposition disposition PWM scheme
offers great advantages such as improved output
voltage waveforms, lower EMI, and lower THD in
comparison of other PWM switching schemes.
Particularly at higher levels this topology requires
less number of components as compared to two-level
inverters [8].
II.
PROPOSED TOPOLOGY
The block diagram of multi-level inverter
using Reversing Voltage topology is shown in fig.
2.1. The principle idea is that, the left side circuit
generates the required positive level is called positive
level generator and the right side circuit is called full
bridge converter which reverses the voltage direction
when the voltage polarity requires to be changed for
negative polarity (negative half cycle of the
fundamental output voltage) [6].
s1
Vdc
s7
s3
Vdc
Rustamji Institute of Technology
s9
s11
output
s8
s4
s10
s 12
Vdc
s5
Vdc
s6
2
Low frequency switches
(for polarity generation)
High frequency switches
(for level generation)
Figure 2.1. Single-phase nine-level inverter for R-L load.
The proposed topology is a symmetrical
topology since all the values of all voltage sources are
equal and it does not face voltage-balancing problems
due to fixed dc voltage values. It is easily extends to
higher voltage levels by duplicating the middle stage
as shown in Fig. 3 [9].
The primary objective of this paper is to
minimize the total harmonic distortion of 9-level
inverter with phase opposition disposition PWM
scheme as compared to other PWM schemes. It also
minimizes power semiconductor switches than
conventional multilevel inverter. For a single-phase
9-level multi-level inverter model, there are 16
switches are needed, whereas the proposed model
uses only 12 switches. The operation of the proposed
topology has been discussed in detail and has been
verified with the help of Matlab/ simulations [10].
III.
This topology is a hybrid multilevel topology
which separates the output voltage into two parts. One part
is called level generation part and is responsible for level
generating in positive polarity. The other part is called
polarity generation part and is responsible for generating
the polarity of the output voltage. The level generation part
requires high-frequency switches to generate the required
levels while polarity generation part requires low-frequency
switches which is the low-frequency part operating at line
frequency [7]. This topology combines the two parts (high
frequency and low frequency) to generate the multilevel
voltage output. The positive levels are generated by the
high-frequency part (level generation), and then, this part is
fed to a full-bridge inverter (polarity generation), which
will generate the required polarity for the output. It requires
ten switches and three isolated dc sources.
1
s2
MODES AND ITS OPERATION
The operation of this topology can be easily
understood by mode of operation of single-phase
nine-level inverter shown in fig. 2.2. There are nine
sufficient switching modes in generating the
multistep level for a nine-level inverter.
137 | P a g e
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622
International
Conference On Emerging Trends in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (ICETMEE- 13th-14th March
2014)
s1
Vdc
s7
s1
Vdc
s2
s7
s2
1
1
s3
Vdc
s9
s11
Vo
Load
s4
s8
s3
Vdc
s10
s11
s9
Vo
Load
s12
Vdc
s4
s8
2
s12
s10
Vdc
s5
2
s5
Vdc
s6
Vdc
s6
Level-0
Fig. (a)
The output voltage will be zero (i.e., level 0)
When switches S2, S3, S4 and S5 are turned ―on‖
shown in fig. (a).
Level +
- 2
Fig. (c)
When switches S2, S5, S7 and S8 are turned
―on‖ the output voltage will be ―2Vdc‖ (i.e., level 2)
shown in fig. (c).
s1
Vdc
s1
s7
s2
1
Vdc
s9
s3
Vdc
s7
s2
s11
1
Vo
Load
s10
s4
s8
Vdc
s12
s3
Vdc
s11
Vo
Load
2
s4
s8
s5
s9
s10
Vdc
s12
2
Vdc
s5
s6
Vdc
Level +
- 1
s6
Fig. (b)
When switches S2, S4, S5 and S7 are turned
―on‖ the output voltage will be ―Vdc‖ (i.e., level 1)
shown in fig. (b).
Level +
-3
Fig. (d)
TABLE-I Switching scheme for 9-level inverter
LEVEL
SWITCH STATES
S1
4
3
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
S2
S3
S4
S
5










Rustamji Institute of Technology



S
6









S7






S8
S9







S10
S11










S12





OUTPUT
VOLTAG
E
4Vdc
3Vdc
2Vdc
Vdc
0
-Vdc
-2Vdc
-3Vdc
- 4Vdc
138 | P a g e
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622
International
Conference On Emerging Trends in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (ICETMEE- 13th-14th March
2014)
 Alternate phase opposition disposition pulse
width modulation (APOD PWM):- In alternate
phase opposition disposition PWM scheme
where every carrier waveform is in out of
When S2, S6 and S7 switches are turned ―on‖ the
output voltage will be ―3Vdc‖ (i.e., level 3) shown in
fig. (d).
0
phase with its neighbor carrier by 180 .
s1
4
3
s7
s2
2
1
s3
Vdc
s9
s11
Vo
Load
Output Voltage
Vdc
1
0
-1
-2
s8
s4
s10
Vdc
s12
-3
-4
2
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
0.02
Time(s)
400
s5
300
Vdc
s6
Fig. (e)
Figure 2.2: fig (a), fig (b), fig (c), fig (d), fig (e) are
Switching combinations of multi-level inverter
topology for different level.
Output Voltage
Level +
- 4
200
100
0
-100
-200
-300
-400
0
When switches S1 and S6 are turned on the
output voltage will be ―4Vdc‖ (i.e., level 4).
Switches S9, S10, S11 and S12 are used to
reverse the voltage direction when polarity requires to
be changed. When switches S10 and S11 are turned
―on‖ together positive half cycle will be generated
and when S9 and S12 are turned ―on‖ together
negative half cycle will be generated across the load.
The voltage blocking capacity of each switch is Vdc
[2]. Each voltage source ―Vdc‖ is required 100V.
According to the table, there are nine switching
combinations to control the multi-level inverter and it
shows the great redundancy of the switching devices.
Operation of the single-phase nine-level inverter with
reversing voltage topology can be easily explained
with the help of fig. 2.2 and Table I
IV.
MODULATION TECHNIQUES
There are different pulse width modulation
strategies with different phase relationships.
 Phase disposition pulse width modulation (PD
PWM):- In phase disposition pulse width
modulation strategy, where all carrier
waveforms are in same phase.
 Phase opposition disposition pulse width
modulation (POD PWM):- In phase opposition
disposition pulse width modulation strategy,
where all carrier waveforms above zero
reference are in phase and below zero
reference are 1800 out of phase.
Rustamji Institute of Technology
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
Time(s)
0.012
0.014
0.016
0.018
Figure 3.1: POD PWM Scheme and nine-level output
voltage.
In Fig. 3.1 for N-level inverters there are N1 triangle carriers are used and which is compared by
the sinusoidal waveform. Whenever sinusoidal
waveform is greater than carriers then gating signals
are generate.
V.
SIMULATION RESULTS:
In this section a simulation model of
Reversing Voltage topology for a single-phase ninelevel inverter is implemented. The simulation
parameters are as following R = 20 ohms, L = 10mH,
dc source voltage is 400V; Frequency of carrier
signal is 2 kHz. In this topology, phase opposition
disposition PWM scheme is used. Table II shows
THD for different PWM switching schemes with
different modulation index.
TABLE-II
PERCENTAGE THD FOR DIFFERENT PWM
STRATEGIES.
Modulation
Index
1.1
1
0.9
PD
PWM
%
THD
12.45
14.20
16.94
POD
PWM
% THD
11.73
13.70
16.84
APOD
PWM
% THD
13.19
14.43
16.94
139 | P a g e
0.02
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) ISSN: 2248-9622
International
Conference On Emerging Trends in Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (ICETMEE- 13th-14th March
2014)
Selected signal: 4 cycles. FFT window (in red): 3 cycles
400
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
200
The author sincerely thanks to director of
M.I.T.S Gwalior, India to carried out this research
work.
0
-200
Mag (% of Fundamental)
-400
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
Time (s)
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
CONCLUSION:
Fundamental (50Hz) = 399.2 , THD= 13.70%
In this paper, a new multi-level inverter
topology with phase opposition disposition pulse
width modulation is proposed. Reversing Voltage
topology with phase opposition disposition PWM
technique is used to produce nine level output voltage
in single-phase and minimize total harmonic
distortion as compared to other PWM techniques.
This multi-level inverter topology improves output
voltage, reduces higher number of semiconductor
switches and voltage stress on semiconductors
switches and it also requires less number of
components compared to two level inverter. One of
the most advantages of the topology is that it requires
less
high-switching-frequency
components.
Simulation results show the performance of singlephase nine-level inverter with improved THD.
6
4
2
0
0
200
400
600
800 1000 1200
Frequency (Hz)
1400
1600
1800
2000
Figure 4.1 POD PWM output voltage and harmonic
spectrum (Modulation index 1.0)
Selected signal: 4 cycles. FFT window (in red): 3 cycles
400
200
0
-200
Mag (% of Fundamental)
-400
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
Time (s)
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
REFERENCES
Fundamental (50Hz) = 425 , THD= 11.73%
4
3
2
1
0
0
200
400
600
800 1000 1200
Frequency (Hz)
1400
1600
1800
2000
Figure 4.2: POD PWM output voltage and harmonic
spectrum (Modulation index 1.1)
The number of required components for single-phase
nine- level inverter is shown in Table III.
TABLE-III
Comparison between different multilevel inverter
topologies
Inverter
type
Main
switches
Main
diodes
Clamping
diodes
DC bus
Capacitor/
Isolated
supplies
Flying
capacitors
Total
numbers
NPC
2(N-1)
Flying
capacitor
2(N-1)
cascade
2(N-1)
(N-1)+4
2(N-1)
2(N-1)
2(N-1)
(N-1)+4
2(N2)(N-1)
(N-1)
0
(N1)(2N+1)
0
(N-1)
(N-1)(N2)/2
(N1)(N+8)/2
Proposed
0
3(N1)/2
0
11/2(N1)
Rustamji Institute of Technology
S. Daher, J. Schmid, and F. L. M. Antunes, ―Multilevel
inverter topologies for stand-alone PV systems,‖ IEEE
Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 2703–2712, Jul.
2008.
[2] Hemant Joshi, P. N. Tekwani and Amar Hinduja Kolorrol
―Multilevel Inverter For Induction Motor Drives Using RV
Topology,‖ IEEE Trans. Ind. 2010.
[3] Jose Rodriguez, Jih-Sheng Lai and Fang Zheng Peng.
―Multilevel Inverters: A survey of topologies, controls and
applications.‖ IEEE Trans. Ind.Electronics.vol-49 no.4 pp
724-738, Aug. 2002.
[4] K. Jang-Hwan, S.-K. Sul, and P. N. Enjeti, ―A carrier-based
PWM method with optimal switching sequence for a
multilevel four-leg voltage source inverter,‖ IEEE Trans.
Ind. Appl., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1239–1248, Jul./Aug. 2008.
[5] G.Sambasiva Rao and K.Chandra Sekhar ―A novel fivelevel spwm inverter system for dual-fed induction motor
drive,‖ IEEE Trans. Ind. ISBN no. 978-1-4673-2048-1112,
pp 375-379 2012.
[6] Nabe, I. Takahashi and H. Akagi. ―A new neutral point
clamped PWM inverter,‖ IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat. Vol.
1A-17, pp 518- 523, sep./oct. 1981.
[7] M. D. Manjrekar and T. A. Lipo, "A hybrid multilevel
invertertopology for drive applications," Proc. 13th IEEE
Conf. on Appliedpower electronics (APEC), California, Feb
1998, pp. 523-529.
[8] E.Najafi, A.H.M.Yatim and A.S. Samosir. ―A new
topology-reversing voltage (RV) for multi-level inverters.‖
2nd International conference on power and energy (PECon
08), pp 604-608, December 2008 Malaysia.
[9] Ehsan Najafi, and Abdul Halim Mohamed Yatim, ―Design
and Implementation of a New Multilevel Inverter
Topology,‖ IEEE Transactions on industrial electronics, vol.
59, no. 11, November 2012.
[10] P.Palanivel Power Electronics Laboratory, SRM University,
Chennai, Tamilnadu, India. Copyright © JES 2010 on-line:
journal.esrgroups.org/jes.
[1]
0
(N-1)/2
0
(5N+11)/2
140 | P a g e