Download Tunnelling Chapter 5. Coulomb Repulsion and ...

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Electrical resistivity and conductivity wikipedia , lookup

Photon polarization wikipedia , lookup

RF resonant cavity thruster wikipedia , lookup

History of physics wikipedia , lookup

History of subatomic physics wikipedia , lookup

Lepton wikipedia , lookup

Standard Model wikipedia , lookup

Elementary particle wikipedia , lookup

T-symmetry wikipedia , lookup

Yang–Mills theory wikipedia , lookup

Spin (physics) wikipedia , lookup

Fundamental interaction wikipedia , lookup

Introduction to gauge theory wikipedia , lookup

Hydrogen atom wikipedia , lookup

Nuclear physics wikipedia , lookup

History of quantum field theory wikipedia , lookup

Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Relativistic quantum mechanics wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup

Superconductivity wikipedia , lookup

Renormalization wikipedia , lookup

Condensed matter physics wikipedia , lookup

Quantum tunnelling wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Chapter 5. Coulomb Repulsion and Resonant Tunnelling
Chapter 5. Coulomb Repulsion and Resonant
Tunnelling
Sponsor
Joint Services Electronics Program (Contracts DAAL03-86-K-0002 and DAAL03-89-C-0001)
Academic and Research Staff
Professor Patrick A. Lee, Dr. Tai-Kai Ng
When a Si-MOSFET is taken to low temperature (typically 1K and below), it is found
that temperature independent conductance
peaks appear as a function of gate voltage
when the gate voltage is below threshold. In
this regime, the electronic states in the device
are localized and the experimental observation is interpreted as being due to resonant
tunnelling, a process where an electron
quantum mechanically tunnels from one
electrode to the other when the electrochemical potential coincides with the energy
of a localized state located near the middle of
the sample. The theoretical description of
this phenomenon has previously been
restricted to single particle wave functions,
i.e., the electrons were assumed not to
interact with each other. In fact, an electron
on the localized site strongly repels the addition of a second electron due to the
Coulomb repulsion of doubly occupying a
single state.
We have formulated the
problem of resonant tunnelling including the
effect of the on-site Coulomb repulsion, and
our results are different from the noninteracting theory in several important ways,
which are amenable to experimental tests.
each spin component tunnels independently.
In particular, when a magnetic field H is
applied, the up and down spin levels are split
by Zeeman energy 2 LBeH and the resonance is
predicted to split into two. When interaction
is included, the two spin components are
intimately coupled, because the spin up and
down electron cannot simultaneously occupy
the localized state without paying a large
energy cost. We recognize that this problem
is closely related to a well-studied problem in
many-body physics, the Kondo problem. In
particular, we find that the line-shape of the
resonance peak is not Lorentzian, as predicted by the simple theory, but is asymmetric with temperature dependence on only
one side of the line. Furthermore, we predict
that the resonance should not be split by a
magnetic field, but should be shifted, and
that it should change its line-shape to
another asymmetric but temperature independent form. This latter prediction of no
splitting has already been observed experimentally. It will be very interesting to fabricate devices to look for the peculiar
line-shape predicted by this theory.
The question of Coulomb repulsion is intimately related to the question of interference
between the tunnelling of electrons of opposite spins. In the non-interacting theory,
Publication
Ng, T.K., and P.A. Lee, "On-Site Coulomb
Repulsion and Resonant Tunnelling,"
Phys. Rev. Lett. 61:1768 (1988).
109
:-i-:^_I: ~~tP-'i
Professor J. David Litster
110
RLE Progress Report Number 131
;,;
::-: ;
~II
-::
:-
:-- -: