Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Market trends in Tariff and Accounting Saburo TANAKA WTSA preparatory meeting for Africa, Victoria Falls, June 2004 The original document is elaborated by Dr Tim Kelly, ITU/SPU. It has completed by Saburo Tanaka. The views expressed in this presentation are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the ITU or its membership. Authors can be contacted by e-mail at: [email protected] [email protected] Agenda Market trends Network evolution Paradigm shift Tariff evolution Challenges for developing countries IP Telephony Mobile services Interconnection, cost Internet issue Some solutions studied in ITU-T SG3 A Mobile Revolution Fixed Lines vs. Mobile Users, worldwide, Million 1'400 Mobile Users 1'200 Fixed Lines 1'000 800 600 400 200 0 1993 1995 1997 Source: ITU World Telecommunication Indicators Database. 1999 2001 2003 5.0% 5.0% Calling opportunities worldwide 0.3% 7.5% 89.7% 19.9% 1993 52.7% 26.7% 19.9% 1998 Mobile-tomobile Mobile-tofixed 25.0% Source: ITU Fixed-Mobile Interconnect website: http://www.itu.int/interconnect 2003 23.4% Fixed-tofixed Fixed-tomobile 25.0% Mobile and Internet: Identical twins born two years apart? Users (millions) and penetration per 100 pop. 1,000 18 Mobile subscribers 16 Internet users 800 14 Mobile penetration 12 Internet penetration 600 10 8 400 6 4 200 2 0 0 1992 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000 01 Asia-Pacific international communications capacity, Gbit/s 70 65 60 Internet Telephone 50 40 30 20 10 0 11 14 8 9 0 0 0 0 1992 1993 1994 1995 16 18 20 23 30 26 31 8 0.1 1996 2 3 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Growth In DSL Subscribers-Regional Division (000s) 1999-2003 20,000 19,000 18,000 17,000 16,000 15,000 14,000 13,000 12,000 11,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 Asia-Pacific North America Western Europe South & South East Asia Latin America Eastern Europe Middle East & Africa 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Revenue growth (US$bn) 1000 900 Service revenue (US$ bn) 800 700 600 500 14% Other: Data, Internet, Leased lines, telex, etc Mobile 39% Int'l 400 8% 300 200 100 Domestic Telephone/fax 39% 0 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 Source: ITU. Traditional regime: Joint provision of service Country A X Country B X 9 Emerging regime: Market entry and interconnection 10 Jointly provided circuit Country A Country B X X X Circuit provided by operator B International simple resale (ISR) (By-passing accounting rate) Country A Operator A Country B PSTN Operator B Interconnect IWF Leased lines Once a foreign carrier accepts the benchmark rate, it can negotiate ISR arrangements with US carriers Telephone service using data transmission (By-passing accounting rate) Country A Country B VSAT Operator A Interconnection PSTN Voice is packetized = data transmission Telephone regulations do not apply IP Telephony Te r m na t i ng i Ne t wor k PSTN/ I SDN P / LM N ADSL I PNe t wor k I W F Loc a or l di sb i r t ut ed unc t f on i Loc a or l di sb i r t ut ed unc t f on i I W F PSTN/ I SDN P / LM N Cal ni i l at t e df r om PSTN/ I SDN/ PLM N o PSTN/ t I SDN/ PLM N Or Call initiated by ADSL Og i i r na t ng i Ne t wor k T 0 2 0 8 5 0 1 0 6 1 4 7 ( ) Call from International Telecommunication Network (ITN) to another ITN via IP-based Network Mobile tromboning (using accounting rate) Operator X or Operator A’s facility in another country International boundary Operator A’s Int’l facility Operator B’s Int’l facility Operator A’s national network Caller A Operator B’s mobile network High Interconnection charge Called B Delivering international voice traffic in 2002 Traditional Traditional bilateral bilateral settlement settlement rate rate system system Via Via aa wholesale wholesale carrier carrier 30% 15% 20% Originating international voice traffic Direct Direct dealing dealing with with the the terminating terminating country country 70% 65% Refile Refile via via aa third third country country Sender Sender keeps keeps all all exchange exchange of of traffic traffic Via Via aa point point of of presence presence in in the the terminating terminating country country Falling prices (1) Average retail price of one m inute call to USA. $2.00 Source: ITU adapted from FCC and national data (34 countries). $1.50 Forecast Mark-up $1.00 $0.50 Settlem ent $0.00 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 Falling Price (2): SwissCom, price per minute of local call and call to US Sw iss call prices. US cents per minute. 74 58 Source: ITU. 58 Call to USA 43 28 Local call 7 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 95 96 97 98 99 00 2001 Infrastructure capacity and costs, TransAtlantic cables, 1983-2000 10'000 Capacity (voice paths), growing by 64% p.a. 100'000'000 10'000'000 1'000'000 100'000 1'000 10'000 100 10 1'000 Cost per voice path (US$), declining by 41% p.a. 1 100 10 1 TAT-7 TAT-8 TAT-9 TAT-10 T-11 T-12/13 Gemini TAT-14 1983 1988 1991 1992 1993 1995 1998 2000 Source: ITU, TeleGeography Inc., FCC. Note: Voice-path numbers assume a compression ratio of 5:1 to number of circuits. Capacity (voice paths) Cost per voice path (US$) 100'000 If distance is dead, and bandwidth is infinite … What do we bill for? What do we bill for? Bill for network connection Increasing integration of monthly telephone subscription and Internet subscription prices Bill for privacy/advertising Privacy-protected customer pays premium Customer agreeing to receive advertising pays less Bill for quality of service Differentiated by transmission quality, waiting time, bandwidth on demand, value-added secretarial support, mail functions etc., Bill for Billing Customising of billing: by service, by user, by site Internet, price and service trends Towards a flat-rate price structure All you can eat for US$20.00 Towards lower service quality “Best efforts” service delivery at lowest price Death of distance Message to other side of earth costs same as a message sent next door Cross-promotion of Internet and other services “Free PC” with three year’s ISP subscription “Free Internet” with residential local loop charges Tendency towards industry concentration AOL’s subscriber base > next ten ISPs added together Challenges for developing countries Service, tariff and technical issues Alternative calling procedures Public switched network to IP based network Challenges related to mobile service Regulatory issues Interconnection rules Implementation of USO Tariff Rebalancing Internet connectivity in developing countries Guideline for negotiating IIC Traffic based negotiation The influence of IP Telephony on price IDC forecasts that “Web Talk” revenues will reach US$16.5 bn by 2004 with 135 billion mins of traffic (skype.com, Gartner Group forecast that IP Telephony and competition in Europe will reduce prices by 75% Telegeography; in 2002 VoIP incresed by 80%, and comprised about 10.8% of all int’l call traffic (8 trillions mins) IP Telephony as % of all int’l calls in 2004 Tarifica forecast 40% Analysys forecast 25% In developing countries, the majority of IP Telephony calls are incoming 16.5 “Web Talk” revenues, US$bn 0.208 2000 Source: IDC. 2004 Challenges Revenue gain and revenue loss Accounting Rate IP-Telephony PTO in Developed country Collect US$ 1.00 from user Pays US $ 0.55 settlement. Retains US $ 0.45 Collect US$ 1.00 from user Pays US$ 0.30 to ISP for terminating call. Retains US$ 0.70 PTO in Developing country Receives US $ 0.55 settlement. Receives US $ 0.02 local call charge. -0.53 US$ 0 Receives 0.30 US $ for terminating charge Pays 0.02 US $ for local call. Retains 0.28 US $ +0.28 US$ ISP in Developing country Difference +0.25 US$ Declining prices for mobile access, global average, in US$, 1992-2000 Monthly subscription, in US$ Connection charge, in US$ CAGR, 1992-2000 = -9.2% p.a CAGR, 1992-2000 = -32.1% p.a. 44.9 38.1 547 34.2 410 31.3 20.2 16.6 231 180 86 1992 1994 1996 1998 1999 75 2000 1992 1994 1996 1998 1999 2000 Note: CAGR = Compound Annual Growth rate. Source: ITU “World Telecommunication Development Report 1999: Mobile cellular” Cultivate the high-spenders Source: Price Waterhouse Coopers, based on Canadian data. Mobile and Fixed-line ARPU in Japan Yen 100 300 278 250 252 265 275 284 Fixed line 272 Mobile 230 200 158 150 100 98 98 97 98 99 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 100 98 96 134 94 127 92 141 91 152 88 160 87 50 0 1995 1996 Years 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Key Interconnection Rules in the WTO Reference Paper Interconnection with “Major Supplies”must be available - At any technical feasible point in the network - In a timely fashion - At cost orientated rates - On non discriminatory and transparent terms - On an unbundled basis - At non-traditional interconnection points if requester pays charges Procedure Procedures for interconnection to major suppliers must be made public Transparency Agreements of major suppliers’ model interconnection offers must be made public Dispute resolution An independent entity (which may be the regulator) must be available to resolve interconnection dispute within a reasonable time frame Regulatory and technical issues Policy makers must resolve such basic questions as: which carriers are required interconnection How the costs will be calculated and recovered, and At what points in the PSTN interconnection should occur Regulatory issues Establishing guidelines in Advance (without it, interconnection negotiation are frequently protracted, delaying the introduction of competition) Introducing competition require “dominant carriers” to interconnect with other carriers Cost orientation: excessive prices deter market entry, hinder competition, end user suffer and can provide a pool of revenue Technical issues Points of interconnection: incumbent operators permit interconnection with their networks at any technically feasible point Dialling Parity and Pre-selection: Call-by-call customer selection or Operator pre-selection by pre-subscription Quality of Interconnection Service Economic issues The economic issues involved in interconnection largely come down to question of cost: cost definition, cost measurement, cost allocation and cost recovery How can interconnection costs be measured? Theoretical Frameworks (Historica, Fully Distributed costs, LRIC) Cost study Approaches (Top-Down, Bottom-Up, Outside-In) Interconnection charge Cost based charges Retail-based charges Price Caps “Bill and Keep” or “Sender Keeps All” Revenue Sharing Main study items in ITU-T SG3 Accounting rate reform Transitional arrangements Action to facilitate negotiations Cost Methodologies Network externalities Mobile termination charge Differences with fixed network services Level of termination charges International Internet Connectivity Implementation of Recommendation D.50 Improving connectivity in LDCs Other studies International Telecommunication Regulations Solutions & difficulties New Remuneration system (adopted) Termination charge system Settlement rate system Special arrangement Difficulty to quickly implement those systems Condition is to reach cost-oriented rate, but No cost data or model for some administrations ⇒ SG3 developed principles and TAF, TAS, TAL cost models Transitional arrangements (review at WTSA) To facilitate staged reduction to cost based rate to avoid sudden fall of revenue (smooth transition) SG3 developed: Guidelines for negotiation Global trends, challenges and solutions INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION ITU-T TELECOMMUNICATION STANDARDIZATION SECTOR OF ITU D.600R (10/2000) SERIES D: GENERAL TARIFF PRINCIPLES Recommendations for regional application – Recommendations applicable to the African Region Cost methodology for the regional tariff group for Africa applicable to the international automatic telephone service 3 3 33 Inter-regional Internet connectivity 0.4 Gbit/s USA / Canada Asia / Pacific Europe Latin America Africa, Arab 0.1 Gbit/s Note: Gbit/s = Gigabits (1’000 Mb) per second. Source: ITU adapted from TeleGeography. Typical ISP cost comparisons <<<Developing countries Commercial & operational costs International connectivity International connectivity National connectivity National connectivity OECD countries >>> Commercial & operational costs ITU-T Recommendation D.50 International Internet Connection The World Telecommunication Standardization Assembly (Montreal, 2000), recognizing the sovereign right of each State to regulate its telecommunications, as reflected in the Preamble to the Constitution, noting a) the rapid growth of Internet and Internet protocol-based international services; b) that international Internet connections remain subject to commercial agreements between the parties concerned; and c) that continuing technical and economic developments require ongoing studies in this area, recommends that Administrations involved in the provision of international Internet connections negotiate and agree to bilateral commercial arrangements enabling direct international Internet connections that take into account the possible need for compensation between them for the value of elements such as traffic flow, number of routes, geographical coverage and cost of international transmission amongst others. Greece and the United States of America have expressed reservations and will not apply this Recommendation. Results of SG3 meeting (May/June2004) ①Adoption of Appendix to facilitate implementation of D.50 ② Self-help by smaller networks with limited traffic ③Continuation of work on Traffic Measurement Network Externality Universal Service Obligation Fund = Cross Subsidy Not recognized as cost Network extremity = increase utility of a network to users operators to provide incentives for users to join the network = this can be added to the usage price or to the monthly subscription fee the network externality effect has a solid basis in economic analysis and had successfully – at least with some regulators – been brought to bear by mobile operators on their case for higher termination rates Can be used by the developing countries to enhancing take-up and roll-out of the network International externalities Country A Customers A (Calling) Access network A1 Accounting Access network A2 International operator A rate International operator B Access network B1 Country B (Called) Access network B2 Customers B Do Customers in A derive benefit from more Customers in B? If so, how much? Is benefit to calling operators in A enough incentive to agree prices above cost? How can we be sure that an externality will be passed through to connect more customers in B? International Telecommunication Regulations (ITRs) ITRs elaborated in 1988 Monopoly situation Basic services only (Telephony) New Market situation Competition New services (Mobile, Internet) Need for new ITRs? Redraft ITRs Integrate into Constitution and Convention Study Group 3 starts reviewing ITRs Rapporteur Group on ITR review (tsg3itr) Council Working Group on ITR (See: http://www.itu.int/itr) Chairman Mr. Alaa Fahmy Secretary S. Tanaka Secretary R. Hill Coordinator-2 Coordinator-1 Coordinator-3 Dr. Mufungahema Mr. Affleck, UK Mr. Marks, USA Tanzania Sub-Group-1 Sub-Group-2 Sub-Group-3 Sub G1: Analyze past work and contributions submitted Sub G2: Examine current ITR Sub G3: Examine need for new provisions