* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download slides
Zero-configuration networking wikipedia , lookup
Recursive InterNetwork Architecture (RINA) wikipedia , lookup
Computer network wikipedia , lookup
Distributed firewall wikipedia , lookup
Wireless USB wikipedia , lookup
Network tap wikipedia , lookup
Airborne Networking wikipedia , lookup
Policies promoting wireless broadband in the United States wikipedia , lookup
Wireless security wikipedia , lookup
A Framework for the Management of Large-Scale Wireless Network Testbeds Krishna Ramachandran, Kevin C. Almeroth, Elizabeth Belding-Royer Dept of Computer Science, UC Santa Barbara WinMee 2005 Growing Testbed Deployment Experimental research crucial in the design of robust wireless networking systems Thus, wireless testbeds are being increasingly deployed Examples: MIT Roofnet, Great Duck Island, UCSB MeshNet, Orbit WinMee 2005 Testbed Management Maintaining Testbeds can be Extremely Labor-Intensive Nature of wireless medium makes management challenging Bugs or design flaws can crash the entire network Best Current Practice? Manual intervention through maintenance of devices on-site Labor-intensive In-band management Prevents certain testbed changes Ex: Switching frequency of a multi-hop wireless network testbed Node failure can leave entire network disconnected In-band management adds overhead to traffic in testbed WinMee 2005 Testbed Management Best Current Practice? (cont'd) Out-of-band management offers substantial relief Typically performed via wired backhaul network Not always feasible! Logistical/Bureaucratic issues (Ex: UCSB MeshNet) Large or inhospitable testbed area (Ex: Rooftop Nets) Our solution: out-of-band management via a multihop wireless mesh network WinMee 2005 Proposed Solution Wireless multi-hop mesh backhaul for out-of-band management Maturing mesh networking technology provides stable backhaul Cheap Easy to deploy WinMee 2005 Outline Motivation ATMA Framework Self-Configuring Architecture ATMA Management Tools Implementation Overview Conclusions WinMee 2005 ATMA Framework Enables out-of-band mgt of large-scale testbeds Distributed agent-manager architecture Self-configuring architecture Extensions of basic framework for management of multi-hop wireless testbeds Proof-of-concept using Linksys WRT54G devices WinMee 2005 Self-Configuring Architecture 1. Manager Beaconing 2. Agent Boot-Strapping 3. Hop-by-hop propagation of mgr beacons throughout network Helps agents automatically discover the manager Helps to resolve 802.11 BSSID problem in mesh networks Agent listen for beacons by scanning all 802.11 channels Pick temporary IP address to communicate with manager Agent Registration Agents register with manager Manager issues appropriate instructions to agents WinMee 2005 ATMA Management Tools Testbed Configuration Tool Interference Meter Listens for IEEE Management frames Count of unique MAC IDs gives estimate of interference level Network Monitoring Using DAMON Agents configure testbed nodes as per instructions from manager Generic monitoring tool for collection of topology data, data traffic statistics, routing protocol statistics http://moment.cs.ucsb.edu/damon/ Topology Control Tool Creates virtual topologies without physically moving nodes Uses selective dropping of packets to create virtual topology WinMee 2005 Implementation Overview Proof-of-concept implemented using Linksys WRT54G wireless devices Low-cost solution Uses OpenWRT open-src firmware (www.openwrt.org) Uses multi-path version of AODV Reliability-based metric for route selection ATMA Management tools using Perl/C WinMee 2005 Conclusions ATMA enables the out-of-band management of largescale wireless testbeds Self-configuring architecture enables quick and easy deployment of support mesh network ATMA extensions for multi-hop wireless testbeds Proof-of-concept using cheap commodity devices Plan to offer framework as free download in the future WinMee 2005 Questions? WinMee 2005