Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Case Study: Application of methods and tools in SME networks Guy Buyle 20120621 Centexbel Industrial Technologies 2012 Aarhus Outline Introduction Methods selection and linking to innovation process Application to the actual networks Summary 2 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Relevance ? “No project development without the customer” G. Bilardello (KONE) Focus on “ecosystem” W. Vancraen (MATERIALISE) 3 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Introduction 4 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL SmartNets Collaboration Model Process / Activity What? When? Who? Actor How? Method 5 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Processes/activities Three types of activities: 1. Collaborative Development and Production (CD&P) All tasks related to the actual development, later intended to be followed by production “Innovation Process Reference Map” 6 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Innovation Process Reference Map 7 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Processes/activities Three types of activities: 1. Collaborative Development and Production (CD&P) All tasks related to the actual development, later followed by production Covers the full product life-cycle 2. Process Transformation activities Basically the transition from one cycle to another in the Map Requires special attention to ensure all knowledge/data is transferred, e.g. from a development to a production stage (other people !) 3. Coordination of the network Need to set-up procedures for smoothening the work flows, especially among partners 8 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Methods selection and linking to the innovation process 9 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Identification of potential methods In total ca. 80 potential methods were identified All methods used in wider area of innovation management: Some more ‘classic ones’, e.g. brainstorming, brainwriting, lead user analysis,… Some more ‘technical’, e.g. Design of Experiments All listed methods are considered suitable for network collaboration 10 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Criteria for selection of suggested methods Link with SmartNets (S). Method should be applicable for (smart) networks Methods preferred that require or benefit having several partners Methods that really fit in the smart philosophy Actual situation in the networks (A). Networks should be presented with methods suited to the stage of the innovation Complimentarity (C). More beneficial if methods can be grouped Novelty for the partners (N). Suggest less well-known and/or less common methods. Limited list (ca. 20) of suggested methods 11 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Linking activities with methods? SmartNet Reference Process Process Methods N° Name 1 Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) 2 Brainwriting 3 Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) 4 Check lists technique 5 Customer Orientation/ Interaction 6 Design of Experiments (DoE) 7 Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) 8 Focus group 9 Lead User analysis 10 Marketing mix – market screening 11 Project Management Techniques 12 Quality Function Deployment (QFD) 13 Rapid Prototyping 14 Scenario analysis (cause – effect method) 15 Service Blueprinting 16 Technology and/or Knowledge Transfer 17 TRIZ 12 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Key result: for each method its suitability towards the various activities is listed Phase of development-production process SmartNet Reference I. II. Creation of ideas Conceptualisation Process Technique Brainwriting ++ M2: ideas production Design of Experiments Case Based Reasoning Lead User analysis III. Prototyping IV. Sampling Process Methods + M4: setting up framework conditions + M5: concept creation + M7: setting up framework conditions for prototype development + M8: Prototype development ++ M4: planning of concept development + M7: project planning for prototype development + M8: Prototype development + M9: Technical evaluation of the prototype +M1: development of an innovation strategy, formulation of innovation objectives, technical possibilities and needs V. Production-marketing + M11: implementation of deployment processes, production of the pilot series + M12: Analysis of the test, evaluation of production reliability +++M15: Analysis of consumers’ responses and complaints 13 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Application to the actual networks 14 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Innovative helmet network: application of QFD Quality Function Deployment (QFD): structured approach to defining customer needs or requirements translating them into specific plans to produce products Approach: List and rank Customer Requirements (eg price, lifetime,…) List Product Features (eg materials, production processes, finish,…) Assess influence of all Product Features to all Customer Requirements (strong/weak, positive/negative) Defining the targets for the Requirements fulfillment Evaluation how Product Features fulfill Requirements 15 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Example: QFD for innovative Helmet 16 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Medical device network: Lead User Analysis The lead user analysis helps to choose the right customers and to integrate them in the innovation process. Approach: Identification of the lead user indicators Identification of the lead users Integration of the lead user in the product development Check if lead user product conception is relevant for broader market For medical device network: Lead users = surgeons 17 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Interior textiles network The network: Specialty chemicals supplier SME Interior textiles producer SME Textile research (coating, finishing) RTO The goal: Functionalise high end interior textiles via latest textile coating developments (e.g. for increased abrasion resistance) 18 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL How is SmartNets contributing to this goal? 19 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL SmartNets Modeller for network description (organisational) Method to describe various aspects of the network: relations, required knowledge, partnership,… 20 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Tricia – use of a multi-purpose platform (operational) Dedicated wiki page, easy to update on daily basis 21 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Tricia – use of a multi-purpose platform (operational) Common unified overview of results, action list, meetings 22 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Networked Design of Experiments (Technological) In brief: DoE is used to plan and conduct experiments and to analyse the resulting data in order to obtain valid conclusions. Actual steps for implementing a networked DoE: Convincing of advantages (only RTD had experience with DoE) Setup of experimental scheme Execution (involves all partners) Processing (statistical) of results Evaluation with all network partners Further training in use of DoE for SMEs 23 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Use of Case Based Reasoning (CBR) (Technological) CBR is based on solving new problems by adapting solutions that worked for similar problems in the past. Approach: Extremely intuitive, done frequently Needed: a database of cases Both SMEs do have this: Chemical formulations Weaving patterns Under evaluation: transfer of personal expertise into algorithms 24 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Management of IPR (Exploitation) Common development IP generation Very rigorous scheme on how to proceed to develop the best approach (8 steps) 25 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Summary 26 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Summary Preparatory steps: Set-up of scheme to identify the processes/activities in a network related to collaborative development and production Identification of methods suitable for use in network Method selection and linking to activities Selection of suitable methods based on 4 criteria Linking of methods to the various activities encountered during collaborative development and production Actual implementation of methods in the 3 networks: Ongoing for various aspects (organisational, operational, technological, exploitation) First evaluation: not straightforward to change habits of network partners but once convinced positive feedback 27 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL © Jan Provoost – Workshop business writing Methods help to find a common language 28 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL Contact & more information Guy Buyle [email protected] Centexbel Technologiepark 7 9052 Zwijnaarde BELGIUM www.centexbel.be Tel: +32 9 220 41 51 Fax: +32 9 220 49 55 Follow SmartNets on: www.smart-nets.eu 29 20120621 G. Buyle - CENTEXBEL