Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Charcot-Marie-Tooth Prevalence:1/2500 type1:begins in first or second decade manifestations: a ;slowly progressive weakness b ; muscular wasting c ; sensory impairment (legs) d ; foot deformities e ; upper limbs lnvolved later 2/3 cases f; pes cavus and hammer toes 75% g; mild kyphosis 10% h; hypertrophic peripheral nerves 25% I; absent ankle reflex (always) j; distal sensory impairment (vib-light T) k; essential tremor in hands (Rousy-Levy) l ; asymptomatic slowing NCV 10% m ;exacerbate in pregnancy (1/3 temporary) n ;routin tests normal o ;CSF normal D D with CIDP p ;sural biopsy onion bulb formation q ;MNCV decrease >25%of normal lower limit .NCV<38m/s in median N r ;SNCV abnormal CMT type 2 :1/3 cases –autosomal D Symptoms: begin later- second decade upper limbs involvement & tremor and areflexia are less frequent MNCV normal or mild abnormal SNAP absent Sural biopsy :hallmark axonal D CMT X: similar to type 1 affected male more severely no male to male transmission second most common (7-16%) associated with CNS involvement (white matter)+ BAER abnormality deafness Ataxia ,dysarthria ,and weakness after visiting high altitudes CMT X : NCV in men significant slowing BAER often abnormal Biopsy axonal loss & demyelination CMT 3 : Dejerine Sottas disease ;CSF pro Progressive hyperthrophic neuropathy Childhood onset- uncommon –areflexia Proximal weakness-enlarged nerves Sporadic(AR some times)-MCV<10m/s CMT4: AR- childhood - progressive weakness Inability to walking (adolescence) NCV 20-30m/s CSF pro is normal Nerve biopsy : loss of myelination onion bulb DIABETIC NEUROPATHY 5% PER YEARS RETINOPATHY-NEPHROPATHYNEURDPATHY IDDM- NIDDM VULNERABLE TO D N LEADING CAUSE OF PERIPHERAL NEUROPATHY FEREQUENCY OF D N 7-80% RISK OF DEVELOPING SYMPTOMIC D N 5YEARS:4-10% 25YEARS:15% 66% HAVE OBJECTIVE D N IDDM 15%--- NIDDM 13% SYMPTOMATIC AGE&D M CORRELATE WITH ABNORMAL VIBRATION TEST HIGHER PERCENTAGE IN THOSE WITH LOW SERUM INSULINE CONCENTRATION RISK FACTORS WITH ON INCREASED FOOT SENSATION :POOR GLYCEMIC CONTROL-HEIGHT-AGE-ALCOHOL EMG&NCV DEMONSTRATE SUBCLINICAL ABNORMALITIES IN MOST PATIENTS WITH IDDM AFTER5-10YEARS D N CLASSIFICATION :SYMMETRIC FOCAL CLINICAL FEATURES DYSTAL SYMMETRICAL P N MOST COMMON D N 75% OF ALL D N SENSORY LOSS&AUTONOMIC SYMPTOMS CORRELATE WITH SEVERITY MOST PATIENTS HAVE MINOR MOTOR SIGN STOCKING&GLOVE DISTRIBUTION BEGIN IN THE TOES IN MORE ADVANCED CASES ANTERIOR CHEST&ABDOMEN ARE AFFECTED DYEING BACK PROCESS LARGE FIBER-------SMALL FIBER LARGE FIBER D N PAINLESS PARESTHESIAS(TOE&FEET) IMPAIRMENT OF VIBRATION&POSITION DTR-ATAXIA SENSORY LOSS DIABETIC POLYRADICULONEUROPATHY ONSET DISTAL SYMMETRIC THEN PROXIMAL SEGMENT L SR00TS-THORACIC—CERVICAL E M G –LOW GRADE ACTIVE DENERVATION(THORACIC) TRIGEMINAL BLINK REFLEX IS SPARED DIABETIC POLYRADICULOPATHY NORMAL S N C V—ROOT LEVEL IS AFFECTED(EMG&CLINICAL) NIDDM&IDDM ARE ASSOCIATED WITH CIDP ------RESPONSE TO IVIG SMALL FIBER D N DEEP PAIN BURNING-ACHING-SHOOTING ALLODYNIA TEMPERATURE&PAIN ARE IMPAIRED—PERSERVATION OF DEEP SENSE&DTR—AUTONOMIC HYPERGLYCEMIC D N CAN OCCUR BEFORE THE ONSET OF D M IGT OGTT--------SMALL FIBER D N PAINFUL P N(UNKNOWN CAUSE)SHOULD BE UNDERGO OGTT TREATMENT INDUCED NEUROPATHY LASSTS FOR WEEKS DIABETIC NEROPATHIC CACHEXIA ACUTE PAINFUL D N—DEPRESSIONINSOMNIA-WEIGHTLOSS -IMPOTENCE M>F ACRODYSTROPHIC NEUROPATHY SENSORY LOSS-FOOT ULCER DISTAL JOINT DESTRUCTION CHRONIC FOOT ULCER---TRAUMA ISCHEMIA INFECTION NEUROPATHIC ARTHROPATHY(CHARCOT JOINT) -----FOOT ULCER-AUTONOMIC IMPAIRMENT D D SYPHLIS DIABETIC PSEUDOTABES:LANCINATING PAIN-LOSS 0F JOINT SENSATION ABNORMALPUPIL EMG&NCV ARE HELPFUL IN CONFIRMING NCV -H REFLEX&LITUDE OF SURAL NERVE ACTIVE DENERVATION POTENTIAL DIABETIC AUTONOMIC NEUROPATHY USUALLY CORRELATE WITH SEVERITY OFSOMATIC NEUROPATHY SUBCLINICAL-SEVER(HEART-GI-GU ) OH-RESTING TACHYCARDIA-H R UNRESPONSIVE TO RESPIRATION------HALLMARK OFAUTONOMIC D N OH—FAILURE OF SYMPATHIC&CARDIAC COMPENSATORY IS IMPAIRED D D---HYPOVOLEMIA-MEDICATION VAGAL DENERVATION-----TACHYCARDIA IN REST SILENT MI GI MOTILITY ABNORMALITY-FECAL INCONTINENCE-DELAYED GASTRIC EMPTYING(NAUSEA)-DIARRHEA-BACTRIAL OVERGHOWTH-COLONIC ATONY(CONSTIPATION)-BLADDER ATONY IMPOTENCE SUDOMOTOR ABNORMALITIES DISTAL ANHIDROSIS GUSTATORY SWEATING PUPILLARY ABNORMALITIES ASYMMETRIC PROXIMAL NEUROPATHY(DIABETIC AMYOTROPHY) BRUNS GARLAND SYNDROME WEAKNESS OF PELVIFEMURAL MUSCLES AGE>50YEARS NIDDM—UNRELATED TO DURATION OF DM SEVER PAININ LOWER BACK&HIP&TIGH WEAKNESS—DTR-OPPOSITE LEG AFFECT MINOR PARESTHESIAS-WEIGHT LOSS >50% STEADY PROGRESSION-PAIN RECEDS SPONTENOUSLY-RECOVERY UP TO 24 MON 66%OVERLAP WITH DISTAL DN EMG:LOW AMPLITUDE-FIBS- IMAGING:R/O OTHER CAUSES SURAL NERVE BIOPSY(ISCHEMIA) TRUNCAL NEUROPATHY T4-T12 ROOTS INVOLVED PAIN IN CHEST&ABDOMEN- BULGING OF ABDOMINAL WALL-OLDER PATIENTS NIDDM-ALLODYNIA-ABRUPT ONSET D D:H Z-MASS LESIONS RECOVERY:SEVERAL MONTHS E M G:ACTIVE DENERVATION FOCAL ANHIDROSIS LIMB MONONEUROPATHY MECANISMS:1-INFARCTION2-ENTRAPMENT INFARCTION:ABRUOT ONSET-ACUTE AXONAL DEGENERATION-SLOW RECOVERY MEDIAN-ULNAR-PRONEAL(MOST COMMON) ENTRAPMENT:INSIDIOUS ONSET-FOCAL CONDUCTION BIOCKMULTIPLE MONONRUROPATHIES ABRUPT ONSET-PROXIMAL NERVE- NERVE INFARCTION DUE TO OCCLUSION OF VASNERVORUM D D:SYSTEMIC VASCULITIS CRANIAL MONO NEUROPATHIES THIRD NERVE PALSY IS MOST COMMDN PUPILLARY SPARING 4-6-7TH ARE AFFECTED ACUTE ISCHEMIC DAMAGE RECOVERY:AFTER 3-5 MONTHS INCREASED INCIDENCE OF ENTRAPMENT NEUROPATHY D M IS FOUND IN 8-12%PATIENTS WITH CTS—25%DM PATIENTS HAVE ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC CTS— 8%SYMPTOMATIC RISK OF CTS---WOMEN 2/2 MEN 2/5 TIMES REASON ? ISCHEMIA ORHYPOXIA ENTRAPMENT----- POSSIBILITY OF DM LABORATORY FINDINGS ; CONFIRMATION OF DM:RANDOM BS>200mg FBS>126mg/dl 2hpp>200mg/dl IGT---- BS=140-200 FBS=110-126 mg/dl EMG&NCV ABNORMALITIES S>M D>P LEG>HAND PATHOLOGY:SMALL VESSEL OCCLUSION— IMMUNE MEDIATE—LOSS OF MYELINATED FIBERS—AXONAL DEGENERATION PAINLESS DISTAL D N----LARGE FIBER PAINFUL DISTAL D N-----SMALL FIBER PATHOGENESIS OF D N: NERVE BLOOD FLOW- ENDONEURIAL VASCULAR RESISTANCE– MYOINOSITOL-ACTIVATE POLYOL PATHWAY------ALDOSE REDUCTASE)ACCUMULATION OF SORBITOL&FRUCTOSEAUTOOXIDATION -ENDONEURIAL HYPOXIA:IMPAIRMENT OF AXONAL TRANSPORT&REDUCE NERVE NA-K ATP ASE ACTIVITY----- AXONALATROPHY TREATMENT OPTIMAL GLUCOSE CONTROL INSULIN PUMP----AT 5 YEARS REDUCE 64% PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION PREVENTS OF DN MYOINOSITOL ? ALBERSTATIN ? LIPOIC ACID----IMPROVED SENSORY SYMPTOMS(AND ALSO C PEPTIDE) VEGF----- NERVE BLOOD FLOW IV METHYL PREDNISOLONE—IVIG SYMPTOMATIC O H:6-10 INCHES HEAD ELEVATED—DRINKING TWO CUPS OF COFEE—EATING MORE FREQUENT SMALL MEALS—DAILY FLUID INTAKE&SALT INGESTION(10-20gr/d)-ELASTIC BODY STOCKING-FLUDROCORTISONE(/1-/6mg/d) NSAIDS(IBUPROFEN)PHENLPROPANOLAMINEMETOCLOPRAMIDE-TETRACYCLINE OR ERYTHROMYCIN-CLONIDIN G U COMPLICATIONS-----UROLOGIST FREQUENT VOIDING-MANUAL ABDOMINAL COMPRESSION-INTERMITTENT CATHATERIZATION—SILDENAFIL-PROPER SKIN CARE Management of neuropathic pain 30-50% reduction of pain ASA-acetaminophen-NSAIDs TCA block of serotonin &NE reuptake amitriptyline(10-25mg)-desiprmine nortriptyline SSRI are less effective Venlafaxine has fewer side effect than TCA 150-225 mg/day Duloxetine 60-120 mg/day moderate effect Bupropion 300 mg/day 30%reduced pain Anticonvulsants: Carbamazepine 1000-1600mg/day Oxcarbazepine 1200mg/d Gbapentin300mg/d--------900-3600mg/d Pregabalin150-600mg/d Topiramate has minor effect Lamotrigine200-400mg/d moderate relief Mexiletine (oral analog of lidocaine) ? Tramadol 200-400mg/d Dextromethorphan high dose---partial relief ataxia-sedation Narcotic analgesics should be limited Topical agents: capsaicin cream o.o25 or o.o75 patches containing 5% lidocain G. B .S Non seasonal illness M>F 1.5/1 1.8/100000 Preceding event 2/3 of patients(1-4weeks before) URI,GI infection,surgery,immunization CMV-EBV-VZ Hepatitis A&B H.FLU Campylobacter jejuni 26% SYMPTOMS& SINGNS -Weakness+paresthesis Ascends proximally over Hours to several days DTR Progression 1-4 weeks Cranial nerve palsy 45-75% Facial paresis usually bilateral BIH(rarely) -Facial myokymia Respiratory failure 12-30% Sensory loss Pain 85% Pharingeal-cervical-brachial variant Autonomic dysfunction 65% LAB FINDINGS CSF EMG& NCV LFT(transient)33% Hyponatremia Hematuria &proteinuria MRI of LS D.D* Porphyria-Diphtheria-Intoxication(arsenicthallium)-Hypokalemia-HypophosphatemiaMyopathy-Tic paralysis-Botulism-Brain stem stroke-Spinal cord compression-Transverse mtelitis-Polyomyelitis TREATMENT* Respiratory support-Heparin-IVIG-Plasma exchange-Symptomatic therapy- PT Case Study Case Study: Atropine Ophthalmic Administration Unmasking Undiagnosed Diabetic Gastroparesis Roger Kenneth Eagan, MD and Pninit Varol, MD Presentation R.R. is a 62-year-old white man with glaucoma and long-standing type 2 diabetes complicated by peripheral neuropathy and retinopathy. He presented to the emergency room with persistent nausea and vomiting. The patient was admitted with presumed symptomatic glaucoma. Three months earlier, he had undergone pars plana vitrectomy surgery for a vitreal hemorrhage secondary to a diabetic tractional retinal detachment. The patient had developed subsequent neovascular glaucoma and had been instructed to use his ophthalmic medications to control symptoms. Several weeks before his emergency room visit, he began to experience left eye pain. The patient was seen by his ophthalmologist, who diagnosed increasing intraocular pressure (IOP). The ophthalmologist intensified his regimen and encouraged the patient to carefully follow the provided regimen. Soon after, R.R. began to suffer from progressive nausea and vomiting. At the time of presentation, the patient had been unable to keep solids or liquids down for several days. He was admitted and treated with intravenous fluids and promethazine, then discharged after 24 hours with arrangements for surgery the following week. The following day, he returned with ongoing intractable nausea and vomiting with opthalmalgia. He underwent a successful shunt placement to relieve his IOP, which relieved his opthalmalgia. However, he continued to have severe nausea and vomiting. The ophthalmology service requested a medicine consult for further evaluation of the nausea and vomiting. The internal medicine consultant found R.R. to be in significant distress with intractable vomiting. His vital signs showed a temperature of 98.6°F, heart rate 88 bpm, respiratory rate 14, and blood pressure of 189/82 mmHg. Per ophthalmology, the eye appeared well with ongoing normal IOP. Heart and lungs were unremarkable. His abdominal exam was unremarkable. Neurological exam demonstrated decreased sensation in the feet in a stocking pattern with no other appreciable defects. A work-up for common causes of intractable nausea and vomiting using laboratory and radiological evaluation was unremarkable. The diagnosis of gastroparesis was entertained. His atropine ophthalmic solution was discontinued. The patient's symptoms improved such that he was again able to take food by mouth. Ophthamology, however, felt that for the long-term benefit of his eyes, it was imperative that the patient be restarted on the atropine ophthalmic solution. Following reinstitution of the ophthalmic atropine, his nausea and vomiting returned. A gastric emptying study using Tc-99m sulfur colloid was obtained. It showed gastric emptying delay of 43.9% (normal range 8-28%). To optimize symptom management and maintain the necessary ophthalmic regimen, metoclopramide and erythromycin were begun with good symptomatic relief. Epilogue. Upon further questioning, R.R. and his wife reported a gradual decrease in his meal sizes and increase in meal frequency over the past year. He most likely had been selfmanaging his progressive diabetic gastroparesis. With the addition of the anticholinergic medication, his underlying diabetic gastroparesis became clinically apparent, leading to his admission and subsequent work-up and diagnosis. R.R. was eventually taken off the atropine ophthalmic drops, but continued to have mild symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis. Therefore, he was continued on metoclopramide with success. Questions : Can atropine ophthalmic solutions be absorbed in clinically significant amounts? Is systemic absorption of other ophthalmic drugs known to be clinically significant? What is a reasonable approach to use with patients on ophthalmic agents? Commentary : Patients with diabetes are known to develop autonomic regulatory problems. Because of this, they can be especially susceptible to medications that have effects on the autonomic nervous system. Oral preparations of ß-blockers and tricyclic antidepressants have been well described. However, we rarely think of ophthalmic agents in this light. It would make intuitive sense that if systemic absorption of ophthalmic agents can attain sufficient serological levels, there would be an expected clinical effect.1,2 From our review of the basic science literature, we have determined that the atropine ophthalmic solutions are readily absorbed from the nasal and gastric mucosa.3,4 One study that measured biologically active atropine (1-hyoscyamine) in sera following ocular and intravenous administration noted surprisingly similar concentrations.3 We performed a Medline literature search and found only a few references to the clinical systemic effects that can ensue from the ophthalmic use of atropine.5 We were unable to find any cases of diabetic gastroparesis unmasked by atropine ophthalmic solutions. We also contacted the pharmaceutical makers of the atropine preparation and were informed that no similar event had been reported. It is our assertion that given the above bioavailability information, undiagnosed clinical side effects are more prevalent than the literature reflects. One of the challenges of primary care physicians is to monitor patients' medication lists. With our subspecialist colleagues adding medications appropriate to the conditions they are managing, sometimes side effects and interactions will occur. The ophthalmic drops sometimes are overlooked in this process. There can be significant systemic absorption of these ophthalmic drops. The effects of ß-blocker ophthalmic solutions on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems have been widely discussed. However, all of the following ophthalmic agents have consistent data showing systemic effects: prostaglandin analogs, adrenergic agonists, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, and cholinergic agonists.6 The following is our approach to patients on these ophthalmic medications. To minimize the systemic absorption of all ophthalmic agents, patients should be directed to strictly instill the prescribed dosage only. They should be further instructed to compress the lacrimal sac for 2-3 minutes after installation of the eye drops. Patients and clinicians need to be aware of the possible systemic side effects and be diligent in monitoring for them. It is therefore recommended that, at the follow-up visits, a brief, focused history and physical exam should be performed targeted towards these side effects. If side effects are noted, patient education should be reviewed. If clinically significant symptoms remain, a dialogue among primary care physician, sub-specialist, and patient should be undertaken weighing the risk and benefits of ongoing administration. Clinical Pearls : All medications with autonomic modulating properties should be given with caution to patients with diabetes. All ophthalmic agents should be monitored for symptoms of systemic absorption. Proper patient education can help minimize the amount of ophthalmic drug absorbed systemically.