* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download lect19-20
Chemical bond wikipedia , lookup
Franck–Condon principle wikipedia , lookup
Atomic orbital wikipedia , lookup
Molecular Hamiltonian wikipedia , lookup
Quantum electrodynamics wikipedia , lookup
Tight binding wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical and experimental justification for the Schrödinger equation wikipedia , lookup
Rutherford backscattering spectrometry wikipedia , lookup
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Electron configuration wikipedia , lookup
1AMQ, Part V Molecules The Molecular Hydrogen Ion Hydrogen Molecule and Covalent Bonding •K.Krane, Modern Physics, Chapter 9 • Eisberg and Resnick, Quantum Physics, Chapter 12. 1AMQ P.H. Regan & W.N.Catford 1 Molecular Bonding For a molecule, we need at least two centres of positive charge ie, two atomic nuclei. The Time Independent Schrodinger Equation (TISE) must be solved for a twocentred potential, with the electrons occupying the allowed levels. The H2+ Molecular Ion: this comprises of a single electron and two protons. It turns out that a particular value for the separation of the two nuclei is favoured (ie. corresponds to a minimum energy) compared to the unbound (free= infinite separation) system. The electron is in effect `shared’ between the two centres of positive charge. 1AMQ P.H. Regan & W.N.Catford 2 1AMQ P.H. Regan & W.N.Catford 3 (a) Consider when the protons are very far apart, then if y1 and y2 are the two separate hydrogen w.functions, and the electron is equally likely to occupy either y1 or y2, then the total w.function is y tot y 1 y 2 Recalling that for hydrogen, in the 1s state, 2 r / a Hydrogen y 100 ( r , , ) e 4 a02 / 3 0 and thus, | y 100 | is W.N.Catford proportion al to e 21AMQ P.H. Regan & 2 r / a0 4 (b) For smaller separations the y1 and y2 wavefunctions overlap and then, y1+y2 and y1y2 have different probability distributions. 1AMQ P.H. Regan & W.N.Catford 5 Since the wavefunctions have different probability density distributions, the energies E+total and E-total are also different. For (y1+y2) it is more likely to find the electron between the protons, which reduces the repulsion and hence a lower energy solution results, ie. to take the electron from the state described by (y1+y2) and take it to infinite distance costs energy. It also follows that E+total < E-total The total energy is given by E+total = E+ + Up, where E+ is the energy of the electron in (y1+y2) and Up is the energy of the repulsion between the two protons. Note, that there is a bound state which has a minimum energy at -16.3eV (corresponding to a separation of 0.11nm). This is 2.7eV less binding energy than a single H atom and one proton at infinity (-13.6 eV) 1AMQ P.H. Regan & W.N.Catford 6 1AMQ P.H. Regan & W.N.Catford 7 The H2 Molecule. This comprises of two electrons and two protons. At infinite separation of the four particles, the energy = 0. (a) At infinite separation of the two protons, the lowest energy corresponds to having two hydrogen atoms, Energy=2 x (-13.6eV)=27.2 eV (b) At small separations, suppose we add one more electron to the (y1+y2) energy level in H2+ (labelled Up+E+ in figure on next page). This is allowed by Pauli principle (ms=+-1/2). This approximately doubles the overall energy (-16.3eV x 2 ~ -32.6 eV at approx 0.11nm) . More accurately, the electron interaction is more complex (-> 31.7eV at 0.07nm separation). The extra electron binds the two protons closer together . The COVALENT BONDING is produced by the symmetric wavefunction, (y1+y2). 1AMQ P.H. Regan & W.N.Catford 8 1AMQ P.H. Regan & W.N.Catford 9 1AMQ P.H. Regan & W.N.Catford 10