Download ABSTRACT DISSERTATION: STUDENT: DEGREE:

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Communication in small groups wikipedia , lookup

James M. Honeycutt wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
ABSTRACT
DISSERTATION: Type I Diabetes and Insulin Omission: An In-Depth Look
STUDENT: Jillian E. Sullivan
DEGREE: Doctor of Philosophy
COLLEGE: Teachers College
DATE: July, 2012
PAGES: 110
While insulin omission has been found to be a common behavior in those with
type I diabetes, it has been primarily studied within the context of disordered eating
behavior. Previous research supports medical providers and patients lack of comfort in
discussing insulin omission. This study was designed to answer two questions. Why do
young adult college students with type I diabetes omit insulin? and what factors facilitate
and act as barriers to open communication regarding insulin omission in the patientprovider interaction. A total 13 (10 females, 3 males) college students completed a
qualitative interview focused on insulin omission and communication of this behavior to
medical providers, and 11 of the 13 completed a modified EAT-26. Using consensual
qualitative research methods CQR (Hill, Thompson, & Williams, 1997), domains that
emerged were reasons for insulin, predominant reason for insulin omission, motivators to
give insulin as prescribed (i.e., adhere), overall communication of insulin omission to
medical providers, and factors facilitating and barriers inhibiting communication
regarding insulin omission to medical providers. Typical reasons for insulin omission
included forgetting or delaying and forgetting, worrying about hypoglycemia and its
social implications, being in situations where limited access to food/medical supplies,
planning to be physically active, or being unsure of carbohydrate count in food. Insulin
omission as a weight loss behavior was not reported by any of the participants during the
interviews and all denied using insulin as a way to control their weight or shape on the
EAT-26. Clinical implications and future research directions are discussed.
Keywords: insulin omission, type I diabetes, non-adherence, eating disorders