Download Document

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Communication
Module 12
LIS 580: Spring 2006
Instructor- Michael Crandall
Roadmap
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The communication process
Barriers to communication
Interpersonal communication
Negotiation
Organizational communication
Barriers to organizational
communication
Electronic communication
Conflict
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
2
Communication
• Creating joint meanings and shared
understanding
• Coordinating (the coordination of)
behavior
• The exchange of information
• Information as a common basis of
human relationships, understanding,
and feeling
Prentice Hall, 2002
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
3
Emotional Intelligence Again
• In “Leading by Feel” several leaders discuss
emotional intelligence and its impact in
organizations
• What common themes did you see in these
short pieces?
• How does paying attention to emotional
intelligence help in communication?
• Is it only the leader’s emotional intelligence
that matters?
• Why do you think communication is so difficult
in organizations?
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
4
The Communication Process
FIGURE 12–1
G.Dessler, 2003
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
5
Barriers to Effective
Communication
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Ambiguous, Muddled Messages
Semantics
Physical Barriers
Loss of Transmission
Failing to Communicate
Competition Barriers
Cultural, Linguistic, and Diversity
Barriers
• Not Listening
G.Dessler, 2003
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
6
Nonverbal Communication
• Nonverbal Communication
– The nonspoken aspects of communication, such
as a person’s manner of speaking, facial
expressions, or body posture, that express
meaning to others.
– Nonverbal communication can complicate the
task of communicating internationally.
• The nonverbal part of communicating is more important
in some societies than in others.
• In many societies, the context (or setting) in which a
message is delivered, with its nonverbal cues, has far
more meaning than the words of the message itself.
G.Dessler, 2003
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
7
Psychological Barriers
• Perception
– Selectivity/exposure filtering out of unpleasant things and
focusing on or recalling things not heard.
– Retention filtering of things that feel good, and the tendency
to forget those things that are painful.
• Experiential Barriers
– The difficulty in understanding things not personally
experienced.
• Emotions
– Emotions influence both what is said and what is heard.
• Defensiveness
– Adjustments people make to avoid acknowledging personal
inadequacies that might reduce their self-esteem.
G.Dessler, 2003
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
8
Interpersonal Communications
• Interpersonal communication
– Communication that occurs between two
individuals.
• Methods for Improving Interpersonal
Communications
– Pay attention
– Make yourself clear
– Be an active listener
– Don’t attack the person’s defenses
– Get feedback
G.Dessler, 2003
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
9
Checklist 12.1
Active Listening





Listen for total meaning.
Reflect feelings.
Note all cues.
Give the person your full attention.
Show that you are listening with an
open mind.
 Encourage the speaker to give
complete information.
G.Dessler, 2003
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
10
Negotiation
• Negotiation defined
– A process in which two or more parties who have
different preference must make a joint decision and
come to an agreement
• Distributive bargaining
– Negotiation under zero-sum conditions, in which
the gains by one party involve losses by the other
party
• Integrative bargaining
– Negotiation in which there is at least one
settlement that involves no loss to either party
Prentice Hall, 2002
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
11
Determining the Bargaining Zone
Prentice Hall, 2002
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
12
How to Improve Your Negotiating
Skills
• Mistakes to avoid when negotiating:
–
–
–
–
Neglecting the other side’s problems.
Letting price overwhelm other interests.
Searching too hard for common ground.
Failing to consider BANTRAs (best alternative to a
negotiated agreement).
• Negotiating Tactics (Using Leverage)
–
–
–
–
Necessity
Desire
Competition
Time
G.Dessler, 2003
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
13
Checklist 12.2
How to be More Persuasive





Establish your credibility.
Frame for common ground.
Connect emotionally.
Provide evidence.
Use peer power whenever it’s
available.
 Have the person make the
commitment active, public, and
voluntary.
G.Dessler, 2003
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
14
Organizational Communication
• Organizational Communication
– Communication that occurs among several
individuals or groups.
• Downward communications go from superior
to subordinate.
• Lateral (horizontal) communications move
between departments or between people in the
same department.
• Upward communications move from
subordinates to superiors.
G.Dessler, 2003
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
15
Formal vs. Social Structure
Rarely do the
communication patterns
match the formal
structure
Cross, Rob. A bird's-eye view: Using social network analysis to
improve knowledge creation and sharing. IBM Executive strategy
report 04Jun2002 http://www1.ibm.com/services/us/index.wss/xs/imc/a1001262
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
16
Multiple Network Dimensions
Four dimensional
analysis- knowledge,
access, engagement
and safety
Knowledge Network
analyzed on only one
dimension- knowledge
Cross, Rob. A bird's-eye view: Using social network analysis to improve knowledge creation and sharing . IBM
Executive strategy report 04Jun2002 http://www-1.ibm.com/services/us/index.wss/xs/imc/a1001262
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
17
The Four Dimensions
Rob Cross
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
18
Another View
• The work network
– With whom do you exchange information as part of your daily work
routines?
• The social network
– With whom do you “check in”, inside and outside the organization to
find out what is going on?
• The innovation network
– With whom do you collaborate or kick around new ideas?
• The expert knowledge network
– To whom do you turn for expertise or advice?
• The career guidance or strategic network
– Whom do you go to for advice about the future?
• The learning network
– Whom do you work with to improve existing processes or methods?
Kleiner, Art. Karen Stephenson’s Quantum Theory of Trust. strategy+business, 4th quarter, 2002.
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
19
Energy
• Do you weave relationship development into work and day-today interactions?
• Do you do what you say you are going to do?
• Do you address tough issues with integrity?
• Do you look for possibilities or just identify constraints?
• When you disagree with someone, do you focus attention on the
issue at hand rather than the individual?
• Are you cognitively and physically engaged in meetings and
conversations?
• Are you flexible in your thinking or do you force others to come to
your way of thinking?
• Do you use your own expertise appropriately?
Cross, R., Baker, W. & Parker, A. (2003). What Creates Energy in Organizations? Sloan Management Review 44(4), pp. 51-57.
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
20
Special Barriers to Organizational
Communication
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Interpersonal Barriers
Authority
Free
Task
Speech?
Political
Identity
Organizational Culture
Organization Structures
G.Dessler, 2003
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
21
Getting Upward Feedback
• Request feedback from people whom you trust and who will
be honest with you.
• If the feedback is too general, ask for examples of specific,
recent behavior.
• Don’t be defensive, make excuses, or blame others when you
hear criticism.
• Do not overreact or underreact to feedback.
• Once the feedback is complete, summarize what the speaker
said to make sure that you understand.
• Explain what you are going to do in response to the feedback,
do it, evaluate the consequences on performance, and then
let the feedback-giver know of the outcome.
• Thank the person for his or her concern and advice.
Source: Adapted from Paula J. Caproni, The Practical Coach (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2001), p. 21.
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
FIGURE 12–2
G.Dessler, 2003
22
Fostering Upward Organizational
Communication
•
•
•
•
Social gatherings
Union publications
Regular meetings
Performance
appraisal
meetings
• Grievances
• Attitude surveys
• A suggestion
system
• An open door
policy
• Indirect measures
• E-Mail
G.Dessler, 2003
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
23
Improving Downward
Communication
• Open-Book Management
– A management style in which a company
opens its books to the employees, sharing
financial data, explaining numbers, and
rewarding workers for improvement.
G.Dessler, 2003
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
24
Improving Horizontal
Communication
Appoint Liaison
Personnel
Organize Committees
and Task Forces
Horizontal
Communications
Use Independent
Integrators
G.Dessler, 2003
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
25
Improving Informal Communications
Maintain
Communication
Intensity
Emphasize
Informality
Informal
Communications
Provide Physical
Support
G.Dessler, 2003
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
26
Hierarchy of Media Richness and
Application for Managerial Applications
Source: Adapted from Richard L. Daft and Robert H. Lengel, “Information Richness: A New Approach to
Managerial Information Processing and Organization Design,” in Barry Staw and Larry L. Cummings, eds.,
Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 6 (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1984), pp. 191–233. Reprinted from
R. Daft and R. Steers, Organizations: A Micro/Macro Approach (Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1986) p. 532.
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
FIGURE 12–5
G.Dessler, 2003
27
Managing Conflict
• Conflict defined
– Perceived differences resulting in
interference or opposition
• Functional conflict
– Conflict over what best supports an
organization’s goals
• Dysfunctional conflict
– Conflict that prevents an organization from
achieving its goals
Prentice Hall, 2002
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
28
Three Views of Conflict
• Traditional view
– Assumed that conflict was bad and would always
have a negative impact on an organization
• Human relations view
– Argued that conflict was a natural and inevitable
occurrence in all organizations; rationalized the
existence of conflict and advocated its acceptance
• Interactionist view
– Encourages mangers to maintain ongoing
minimum level of conflict sufficient to keep
organizational units viable, self-critical, and
creative
Prentice Hall, 2002
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
29
Conflict & Organizational Performance
Prentice Hall, 2002
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
30
Sources of Conflict
• Communication differences
– Arising from semantic difficulties,
misunderstandings, and noise in the
communication channels
• Structural differences
– Horizontal and vertical differentiation creates
problems of integration leading to disagreements
over goals, decision alternatives, performance
criteria, and resource allocations in organizations
• Personal differences
– Individual idiosyncrasies and personal value
systems create conflicts
Prentice Hall, 2002
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
31
Dimensions of Conflict
• Based on work of Kenneth W. Thomas at the
Naval Postgraduate School Graduate School
of Business and Public Policy
http://research.nps.navy.mil/cgi-bin/vita.cgi?p=display_vita&id=1023567855
• Cooperativeness
– The degree to which an individual will attempt to
rectify a conflict by satisfying the other person’s
concerns
• Assertiveness
– The degree to which an individual will attempt to
rectify the conflict to satisfy his or her own
concerns
Prentice Hall, 2002
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
32
Thomas’ Conflict Model
Thomas, K. W. and Kilmann,R. H. Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. March 19,
2001 http://www.acer.edu.au/publications/acerpress/onlinetesting/documents/TKI.pdf
May 4, 2006
LIS580- Spring 2006
33
Next Time
•
Managing groups and teams and more
–
•
Read Chapter 13 and the assigned articles
Discussion questions:
–
–
–
–
May 4, 2006
These lessons were derived from the military. How much
do you think can be transferred to other environments?
How do you think a similar examination of leadership
behaviors on a basketball team would compare?
Given our discussions over the last week about leadership,
do you think the “Big 12” behaviors would be effective for
team and individual leadership in a library? Why or why
not?
Is there something missing in this list? If so, what is it?
LIS580- Spring 2006
34