Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup
Scattered disc wikipedia , lookup
Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup
New Horizons wikipedia , lookup
Late Heavy Bombardment wikipedia , lookup
Kuiper belt wikipedia , lookup
Planet Nine wikipedia , lookup
Eris (dwarf planet) wikipedia , lookup
Pluto Loses Planet Status Written by Denise Himes The debate over Pluto being a planet or not is immense. What could Pluto possibly be, according to the International Astronomical Union’s final decision of the definition of a planet, is an object that orbits the sun and is large enough to have become round due to the force of its own gravity. In addition, a planet has to dominate the neighborhood around its orbit. Pluto has been demoted because it doesn’t dominate its neighborhood, and its orbit is somewhat different. Therefore this makes Pluto a dwarf planet in the eight major planet solar system instead of a major one. A dwarf planet looks like a regular planet, but is not one. These planets are independent bodies in the solar system which are large enough to flaunt individual planetary processes. They have the ability to grow from irregular to round on account of the transition made possible by each one's gravitational pull. Pluto’s orbit crosses Neptune’s orbit adding to its irregularities and not dominating its neighborhood. Pluto and its moon Charon are known to be part of the Kuiper Belt “scattered disc,” orbiting the sun around Neptune. Eris, another dwarf planet was found to be bigger than Pluto in the belt. This caused some havoc because Eris had speculation of being a planet. As Pluto has the same characteristics of other dwarf planets (which are not planets under its regular definition) due to the new definition of a planet, it is then discovered that it is part of the Kuiper Belt and should not be continued to be called a planet. If astronomers were to suspect an object that was larger and farther from Eris and Pluto it would be considered a planet. Since that’s not entirely the likelihood its finalization of Neptune being the last planet in the solar system is reasonable. Pluto has always been an “oddball” when it was considered a planet. Its composition is like a comet's. It is said that its elliptical orbit is tilted 17 degrees from the orbits of the other planets and is only 0.07 times the mass of the other celestial objects found in its orbit, so it does not meet the International Astronomical Union's third criteria that an object "should be the dominant gravitational body in its orbit.” Another oddity is the way that the planets in the solar system are aligned and what they are composed of. There are the inner four “terrestrial planets,” which are Mercury, Venus, Earth and Mars. Then there are the four gas planets, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. Pluto is left, a very small ball made of rock and ice. This accurately does not fall into either group. Since it has icy dense rocky characteristics as does the Kuiper Belt objects do, Pluto simply belongs there. Over the years scientists have found out more and more about the solar system and its components. With further research and findings it is confirmed that Pluto is in fact not a planet and will stay like that until more elaborate research is found. Pluto shall always be a dwarf planet in the Kuiper Belt in our universe. But overall the biggest thought in this debate is not the classification of the object but the difference that led Pluto to become something other than a planet. Cain, F. (April 2008). Why pluto is no longer a planet. Retrieved from Universe Today Web site: http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/10/why-pluto-is-no-longer-a-planet/ Chang, K. (January 2001). Pluto’s not a planet? only in new york. Retrieved from the New York Times Web site: http://www.nytimes.com/2001/01/22/nyregion/pluto-s-not-aplanet-only-in-new-york.html?pagewanted=1