Download Vertex Reconstructing Neural Networks at the ZEUS Central

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Computer network wikipedia , lookup

Airborne Networking wikipedia , lookup

Network tap wikipedia , lookup

Internet protocol suite wikipedia , lookup

Recursive InterNetwork Architecture (RINA) wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Vertex Reconstructing Neural Networks
at the ZEUS
Central Tracking Detector
FermiLab, October 2000
Erez Etzion1,
Gideon Dror2, David Horn1, Halina Abramowicz1
1. Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
2. The Academic College of Tel-Aviv-Yaffo, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Physics @ HERA
• High energy e – p
scattering probe deep
inside the proton in
order to study its
constituents structure
• Study substructure of
quarks, electrons, N
and C current
procesesss, tests of
QCD and search fo
new particles
Vertex Reconstruction
Ee=27.5 GeV, Ep=820GeV
FermiLab, October 2000
ZEUS
• 3 level trigger
• Collision
every 96 nsec
(10MHz), FLT
~ 1MHz,
SLT<100Khz
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000
Zeus Central Tracking Detector
 ( PT )
PT
•
•
•
•
 0.005PT  0.0016
205 cm long, 18.2<R<79.4.
Magnetic field 1.43 T.
24192 wires, 4608 signal wires, 9 superlayers (8 wire layer each)
Axial wires Superlayer 1,3,5,7,9, Stereo (+/- 50) 2,4,6,8. 1,3,5 – z
meas. (+/- 4cm)
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000
Input Data
• The Input SLT data:
• Xy position of
superlayers 1,3,5,7,9
• Z-by-timing in 1,3,5
(red)
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000
Ghost hits
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000
Z measurement uncertinties
• Example of z Meas. Uncertainty
• Left – single track in xy; Right – z vs r
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000
The Network
•
Based on step-wise changes in the data
representation: input points ->local line segments>global arcs.
• Two parallel networks:
1. Construct arcs & correctly find some of the tracks
2. Evaluate z location of the interaction point
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000
Arc Identification Network
• Follow the primary visual
system
• Input 100000 neurons (the
retina like) cover 5000cm2
• Neuron fire when hitted in
its receptive field. (xy)
• Second layer – line
segment detector (XYa).
• An active 2ed layer=line
segment centered at XY
with angle a
Vertex Reconstruction
VXYa  g ( J XYa , xyVxy  2 ) , J XYa , xy
xy
FermiLab, October 2000
 1

  1
 0

if
if
rT  0.5  rP  2
0.5  rT  1  rP  2
otherwise
Receptive fields of line segment
neuron
• A line segment
centered about the
central black dot with
orientation parallel to
the oblique line is
connected to the input
neurons(squares) with
weight: pink +1
Blue=-1 Yellow=0
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000
Third layer Network
• A track from the IP
project into circle in rf
• Transform the
representation of local
line segments into arc
segments.
• A neuron is labled by
k, q, I (curvature,
slope and ring).
• Mapping = winner
take all.
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000
Arc Identification last stage
• Neurons are global arc
detectors.
• Detect tracks projected
in z=0 plane.
• Each active neuron kq
is equivalent in the xy
plane to one arc in the
plot.
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000
z Location Network
• Similar architecture to the first net
• A first layer input from the receptive field as its
corresponding neuron in the first net.
• Get the mean of the z values of the points within the
receptieve field.
• Second layer compute the mean value of the z of the first
layer.
• The z averaging procedure is similary propagated to the
third layer.
• Last layer evaluate the z value of the origin of each arc
identified by the first network by simple linear
extrapolation.
• The final z estimate of the vertex is calculated by
averaging the output of all active fourth layer neurons.
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000
z-location resolution
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000
Number of track found
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000
Network Performance
• Study performed with
324 Networks
• Sigma vs number of
neurons
• Small correlation -.26
• The classical
histogram method
width ~8.5 cm.
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000
Network Performance (2)
• The network output
width as a function of
N1 and N2
• N1=# neurons in the
first layer
• N2=#neurons in the
third layer
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000
New developments and crosschecks
• Form lateral connection between 1st layer, which
enabled us to reduce threshold still with good
signal to noise - > reduce network size.
• Study network size –> x10 reduction.
parameters: size and shape of receptive fields in 1st
layer, resolution in k-theta space, range of kvalues (loosing tracks with r<45 cm)
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000
Summary
• FF double NN for pattern identification, selecting
a subset of which is simple to derive the answer.
• Fixed architecture – can be implemented in HW.
• 1st NN partial tracking in xy.
• The 2ed NN handles z-values of the trajectories
estimating the z arcs origin.
• Performance is better than the “clasical method”.
Vertex Reconstruction
FermiLab, October 2000