Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Chapter 11 Hypothesis Tests: Two Related Samples Overview Learning objectives Vocabulary lesson again Introduce t test for related samples Advantages and disadvantages An example Review questions 2 Learning Objectives Difference between independent-measures & related-samples experimental design Difference between repeated-measures & matched-subjects experimental design Compute t test for dependent groups Advantages and disadvantages Measures of effect size 3 Vocabulary Related-samples t statistic Repeated- measures design Matched-samples design Difference scores (estimated standard error of D-bar) Individual differences Carry-over effects 4 Related-samples t statistic Two forms • Repeated-measures design • Matched-samples design Use difference scores between two measurement points rather than means 5 Repeated-measures The same participants give us data on two measures (e. g. Before and After treatment) • Aggressive responses before video and aggressive responses after Accounts for the fact that if someone is high on one measure probably high on other. 6 Matched-samples Individuals in one group are matched to individuals in a second sample • Matching based on variables thought to be relevant to the study • Not always perfect match Also called matched pairs or pairwise t test 7 Difference Scores Calculate difference between first and second score (between individual scores or matched pairs) • e. g. Difference = Before – After • D = X2-X1 Base subsequent analysis on difference scores 8 The Formulas D D t , df n 1 sD sD 2 s s n n 9 Hypothesis Testing Null states that • The population of difference scores has a mean of zero • No systematic or consistent difference between the conditions H 0 : D 0 Alternative states that H1 : D 0 • There is a real difference 10 Advantages of Related Samples Eliminate subject-to-subject variability • Makes the test more powerful Control for extraneous variables Need fewer subjects 11 Disadvantages of Related Samples Order effects Carry-over effects Subjects no longer naïve Change may just be a function of time Sometimes not logically possible 12 An Example Therapy for rape victims • Foa, Rothbaum, Riggs, & Murdock (1991) A group (n=9) received Supportive Counseling Measured post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms before and after therapy 13 Step 1 Null: there is no difference in symptoms in individuals after treatment Alternative: there is a difference in symptoms α=.05, two tailed H 0 : D 0 H1 : D 0 14 Step 2 With a sample of 9 • df = n-1 = 9-1 = 8 • Critical value = +2.306 Sketch 15 The Data: Therapy for PTSD Before Mean St. Dev. 21 24 21 26 32 27 21 25 18 23.84 4.20 After 15 15 17 20 17 20 8 19 10 15.67 4.24 Diff. 6 9 4 6 15 7 13 6 8 8.17 3.60 16 Eye test of Results The Supportive Counseling group decreased number of symptoms Was this enough of a change to be significant? Before and After scores are not independent; use related-samples t test 17 Step 3 Compute t test for related samples D D D D 8.22 0 8.22 t 6.85 sD 3.6 1.2 sD n 9 df = n - 1 = 9 - 1 = 8 18 Step 4 critical value with 8 df, α=.05, twotailed = +2.306 We calculated t = 6.85 Since 6.85 > 2.306, reject H0 Conclude that the mean number of symptoms after therapy was less than mean number before therapy. Supportive counseling seems to work. The 19 SPSS Next slide shows SPSS Printout • Similar printout from other software • Results match ours 20 Paired Samples Statistics Mean Pair 1 Std. Deviation N Std. Error Mean POST 15.6667 9 4.2426 1.4142 PRE 23.8889 9 4.1966 1.3989 Paired Samples Correlations N Pair 1 POST & PRE Correlation 9 .637 Sig. .065 Paired Samples Test Paired Differences POST - PRE Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean -8.2222 3.5978 1.1993 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper t -10.99 -5.46 -6.86 df Sig. (2-tailed) 8 .000 21 Magnitude of difference by computing effect size Two methods for computing effect size Cohen’s r2 d D Cohen' s _ d s 2 t r2 2 t df 22 Review Questions Why do we say that the two sets of measures are not independent? What are other names for “related samples?” How do we calculate difference scores? • What happens if we subtract before from after instead of after from before? 23 Cont. Review Questions--cont. do we usually test H0: D = 0? Why do we have 8 df in our sample when we actually have 18 observations? What are the advantages and disadvantages of related samples? Why 24