Download Atom

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Periodic table wikipedia , lookup

Tennessine wikipedia , lookup

Ununennium wikipedia , lookup

Unbinilium wikipedia , lookup

History of molecular theory wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
ATOMS
and their
HISTORY
Atomic Models

This model of the
atom may look
familiar to you. This
is the Bohr model. In
this model, the
nucleus is orbited by
electrons, which are
in different energy
levels.
– A model uses familiar ideas to
explain unfamiliar facts
observed in nature.
 A model can be changed as new
information is collected.

The atomic model
has changed
throughout the
centuries, starting in
400 BC, when it
looked like a billiard
ball →
Who are these men?
In this lesson, we’ll learn
about the men whose
quests for knowledge
about the fundamental
nature of the universe
helped define our views.
Democritus

This is the Greek
philosopher Democritus
who began the search for
a description of matter
more than 2400 years
ago.
– He asked: Could
matter be divided into
smaller and smaller
pieces forever, or was
there a limit to the
number of times a
piece of matter could
be divided?
400 BC
Atomos
His theory: Matter could
not be divided into
smaller and smaller
pieces forever, eventually
the smallest possible
piece would be obtained.
 This piece would be
indivisible.
 He named the smallest
piece of matter “atomos,”
meaning “not to be cut.”

Atomos
To Democritus, atoms
were small, hard
particles that were all
made of the same
material but were
different shapes and
sizes.
 Atoms were infinite in
number, always
moving and capable
of joining together.

This theory was ignored and
forgotten for more than 2000
years!
Why?

The eminent
philosophers of
the time,
Aristotle and
Plato, had a
more respected,
(and ultimately
wrong) theory.
Aristotle and Plato favored the earth, fire, air
and water approach to the nature of matter.
Their ideas held sway because of their
eminence as philosophers. The atomos idea
was buried for approximately 2000 years.
Dalton’s Model

In the early 1800s,
the English
Chemist John
Dalton performed a
number of
experiments that
eventually led to
the acceptance of
the idea of atoms.
Dalton’s Atomic Theory Summary
matter is composed, indivisible particles
(atoms)
2. all atoms of a particular element are identical;
different elements have different atoms
3. atoms combine in certain whole-number
ratios
4. In a chemical reaction, atoms are merely
rearranged to form new compounds; they are
not created, destroyed, or changed into atoms
of any other elements.
1.
Problems with Dalton’s Atomic
Theory?
1. matter is composed, indivisible particles
Atoms Can Be Divided, but only in a nuclear reaction
2. all atoms of a particular element are identical
Does Not Account for Isotopes (atoms of the same
element but a different mass due to a different number
of neutrons)!; different elements have different atoms
YES!
3. atoms combine in certain whole-number ratios
YES! Called the Law of Definite Proportions
4. In a chemical reaction, atoms are merely rearranged to
form new compounds; they are not created, destroyed,
or changed into atoms of any other elements.
Yes, except for nuclear reactions that can change
atoms of one element to a different element
Thomson’s Plum Pudding Model
 In
1897, the
English scientist
J.J. Thomson
provided the first
hint that an
atom is made of
even smaller
particles.
News flash: atoms aren’t
fundamental
J. J. Thomson (1897)

experimented with “cathode rays”

“and then... made a bold
speculative leap. Cathode rays are
not only material particles, he
suggested, but in fact the building
blocks of the atom: they are the
long-sought basic unit of all matter
in the universe.”
Schematic of actual
1897 apparatus
(vacuum inside):
Cathode-Ray Tubes – ever seen
one?
http://www.howstuffworks.com/tv4.htm
Thomson Model
Thomson studied
the passage of an
electric current
through a gas.
 As the current
passed through the
gas, it gave off
rays of negatively
charged particles.

Thomson Model
 This
surprised
Thomson,
because the
atoms of the gas
were uncharged.
Where had the
negative charges
come from?
Where did
they come
from?
Thomson Model
He proposed a
model of the atom
that is sometimes
called the “Plum
Pudding” model.
 Atoms were made
from a positively
charged substance
with negatively
charged electrons
scattered about,
like raisins in a
pudding.

Thomson concluded that the
negative charges came from within
the atom.
A particle smaller than an atom had
to exist.
The atom was divisible!
Thomson called the negatively
charged “corpuscles,” today known
as electrons.
Since the gas was known to be
neutral, having no charge, he
reasoned that there must be
positively charged particles in the
atom.
But he could never find them.
Rutherford’s Gold Foil
Experiment

In 1908, the
English physicist
Ernest Rutherford
was hard at work
on an experiment
that seemed to
have little to do
with unraveling the
mysteries of the
atomic structure.
nuclear physicist,
Thomson’s student,
New Zealander teaching
in Great Britain
 Rutherford’s
experiment Involved
firing a stream of tiny positively
charged particles at a thin sheet of
gold foil (2000 atoms thick)
Rutherford’s Experiments
(1910-11)
(done by undergrad Ernest Marsden/physicist Hans Geiger)
Fired beam of positively-charged alpha
particles at very thin gold foil.
 Alpha particles caused flashes of light when
they hit the zinc sulfide screen

Rutherford’s Experiment:
prediction
By Thomson’s model,
mass and + charge of gold
atom are too dispersed to
deflect the positivelycharged alpha particles,
so...
particles should shoot
straight through the gold
atoms.
Rutherford’s Experiment:
prediction
Alpha particles will pass
through like this …
Rutherford’s experiment:
what actually happened
The Nucleus Repeled the Alpha Particles
– Most of the positively
charged “bullets” passed
right through the gold
atoms in the sheet of
gold foil without
changing course at all.
– Some of the positively
charged “bullets,”
however, did bounce
away from the gold
sheet as if they had hit
something solid. He
knew that positive
charges repel positive
charges.
This could only mean that the gold atoms in the
sheet were mostly open space. Atoms were not
a pudding filled with a positively charged
material.
 Rutherford concluded that an atom had a small,
dense, positively charged center that repelled
his positively charged “bullets.”
 He called the center of the atom the “nucleus”
 The nucleus is tiny compared to the atom as a
whole.

Rutherford’s Model of the
Atom
• gold atom has small,
dense, positively-charged
nucleus surrounded by
“mostly empty” space
in which the electrons
must exist.
• Positively charged
particles called “protons”
• like tiny solar system
+
How much of an atom is empty
space?
Most of it!
In fact, if the nucleus of an atom
were the size of a marble, the
innermost electrons would be
how far away?
•
•
•
•
One-half inch
Six inches
Eighteen inches
One-half mile
+

http://chemmovies.unl.edu/ChemAnime/R
UTHERFD/RUTHERFD.html
Bohr Model
 In
1913, the
Danish scientist
Niels Bohr
proposed an
improvement. In
his model, he
placed each
electron in a
specific energy
level.
Bohr Model

According to Bohr’s
atomic model,
electrons move in
definite orbits
around the
nucleus, much like
planets circle the
sun. These orbits,
or energy levels,
are located at
certain distances
from the nucleus.
Wave Model
The Wave Model
Today’s atomic
model is based on
the principles of
wave mechanics.
 According to the
theory of wave
mechanics,
electrons do not
move about an
atom in a definite
path, like the
planets around the
sun.

The Wave Model
In fact, it is impossible to determine the exact
location of an electron. The probable location of
an electron is based on how much energy the
electron has.
 According to the modern atomic model, at atom
has a small positively charged nucleus
surrounded by a large region in which there are
enough electrons to make an atom neutral.

Electron Cloud:
A space in which
electrons are likely to be
found.
 Electrons whirl about the
nucleus billions of times
in one second
 They are not moving
around in random
patterns.
 Location of electrons
depends upon how much
energy the electron has.

Electron Cloud:
Depending on their energy they are locked
into a certain area in the cloud.
 Electrons with the lowest energy are
found in the energy level closest to
the nucleus
 Electrons with the highest energy are
found in the outermost energy levels,
farther from the nucleus.

But wait – there’s more!
James Chadwick
(1932)
Discovered a neutral
(uncharged) particle in the
nucleus. Called it the
“neutron”
Atom “split” by John Cockcroft
and Ernest Walton, using a
particle accelerator, in late
1932
Atom “split” later that year
Atom “split” by
John Cockcroft
and Ernest
Walton, using a
particle
accelerator, in late
1932
Splitting the atom led to some
very practical consequences
The Atom
An atom consists of a nucleus
–(of protons and neutrons)
 electrons
nucleus.
in space about the
Electron cloud
Nucleus
Subatomic Particles

Quarks
–component
of protons
& neutrons
–6 types
–3 quarks =
1 proton or
1 neutron
He
Properties of Subatomic
Particles
Property
Particle
Mass (amu),
Mass (g)
Relative
Charge
Electron
0.00055
9.110 x 10-28
-1
Proton
1.00728
1.673 x 10-24
+1
Neutron
1.00866
1.675 x 10-24
0
Now we understand why the
elements come in periods of 8

The order of the elements is determined by their
atomic number (= the number of protons)

The atomic mass of the elements is determined
by the number of protons and neutrons. A given
element can have different number of neutrons,
and therefore different atomic masses.

The chemical properties of the elements are
determined by the number of electrons in their
outer (valence) shells