* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Sapling performance across a montane deciduous/coniferous
General circulation model wikipedia , lookup
Scientific opinion on climate change wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on humans wikipedia , lookup
Public opinion on global warming wikipedia , lookup
Climate change and poverty wikipedia , lookup
Surveys of scientists' views on climate change wikipedia , lookup
IPCC Fourth Assessment Report wikipedia , lookup
Effects of global warming on Australia wikipedia , lookup
Climate change effects on New England montane forests: evidence from the past, implications for the future Matthew Landis Dept. Biology, Middlebury College [email protected] New England forests – 2100? Iverson and Prasad, 1998 http://www.fs.fed.us/ne/delaware/atlas The deciduous – coniferous ecotone Cogbill and White, 1991 Past and future changes ► Has the location of the DCE changed in the past? witness tree surveys – comparison with present-day ► What sets the DCE? How will it respond to future climate change? a demographic approach – which life stages are most affected? What is the role of sapling competition vs. direct climate factors? Changes in New England climate since 1895 Keim and Rock, 2001 Elevation shift in the ecotone – an upper limit ► 1.1° C change in annual temperature since 1895 (Keim and Rock, 2001) ► Lapse rate: 0.61° C / 100 m (Siccama 1974) 0.57° C / 100 m (Richardson et al. 2004) ►~ 150 – 200 m shift in the deciduous/coniferous ecotone ► e.g. 800 m -> 600-650 m in 1780’s Witness tree survey records ► Surveyor’s records from original lotting surveys (1780’s – 1790’s) ► Vermont is unique – surveyors covered even the high elevations ► Maps obtained from C. Cogbill, Vermont State Archives, Town Offices ► 10 towns digitized Sampled towns Witness tree locations ► 950 trees from 88 m to 1119 m (most between 200 and 700 m) ► Elevation error estimated at 15 m (based on 75 m buffer) ► beech, birch, maple, spruce comprised 88% of all trees Forest composition– 1780’s 100 ► Ecotone beech: 875-900 m maple: 820-860 m 90 Percent composition (?) ► Upper limit of 80 70 Birch 60 Maple 50 Beech 40 Fir 30 Spruce 20 10 0 630 720 810 900 990 Present day sampling locations ►9 transects across the DCE ► Point-centered quarter every 25 m elevation (625 m – 975 m) ► Up to 15 points per transect Forest composition– 2006 ► Ecotone 80 70 Birch 60 Maple 50 Beech 40 Fir 30 Spruce 20 10 0 625 700 775 850 925 775 850 925 40 Number beech: 850 m maple: 825 m 90 Percent composition 800-850 m ► Upper limit of 100 30 20 10 0 625 700 Elevation (m) 2006 100 100 90 90 80 80 70 Birch 60 Maple 50 Beech 40 Fir 30 Spruce 20 10 70 Birch 60 Maple 50 Beech 40 Fir 30 Spruce 20 10 720 810 900 0 625 990 700 775 850 925 775 850 925 40 Number 0 630 Percent composition Percent composition 1780’s 30 20 10 0 625 700 Elevation (m) Summary ► Ecotone much less pronounced in 1780’s than now ► Much greater abundance of red spruce in 1780’s ► Upper limit of beech and maples has not increased over the past 200 years Sapling competition across the DCE Cogbill and White, 1991 Performance Colder Temperature Warmer Loehle 2000 Mt. Abraham, VT (1221 m) Methods ► Locate gaps across DCE (680, 740, 770, 800, 830, 890) ► Measure extension growth (internode length) of dominant saplings ► Multiple regression to control ‘nuisance’ variables (height and light) ► Measured size distribution along gradient growth = height + canopy openness + elevation Species n total R2 ABBA 73 0.54 PIRU 99 0.41 0.04 0.034 BEAL 124 0.30 0.05 0.021 ACPE 62 0.52 0.16 0.0002 FAGR 65 0.35 0.15 0.0013 ACSA 44 0.28 0.07 0.14 elevation elevation R2 P 0.15 < 0.0001 0.15 0.04 0.05 NS 0.16 0.15 Sapling growth partially consistent with adult abundance n = 5 plots at each elevation Conclusions ► No support for parabolic model of sapling growth ► Suggestion of trade-off model – competition between species likely to delay invasion of northern hardwoods ► Weak trends in growth along gradient suggest other performance parameters and life-history stages likely to play a strong role Acknowledgements ► Charlie Cogbill ► Undergraduate research assistants: Alyse Forrest, Sarah Fortin, Kerry Cebul, and Jill Morrison ► Bill Hegman, Middlebury College ► Vermont EPSCoR ► Middlebury ► U.S. College Forest Service ► Vermont Dept. Forests, Parks, and Recreation Proportion browsed Browsing varies by species and elevation 1 abba piru 0.8 beal 0.6 acpe 0.4 fagr acsa 0.2 0 650 700 750 800 Elevation (m) 850 900 www.esd.ornl.gov ABBA