Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Adapting to climate change through appropriate climate change adaptation strategies to reduce vulnerability “A case of Gishwati area-Rwanda” Expert Meeting on Climate Change Education for Sustainable Development in Africa Mauritius, 20- 22,March BY: JOHNSON NKUSI The problem - Gishwati has the most fertile soil in the country, environmental burden caused by the newly settled human activities such as deforestation and over cultivation on steep slopes went beyond the tolerance level - Further more, over the past decade, fluctuation of precipitation, probably due to climate change, worsened the situation of soil degradation at hill sides while severe flooding is happening at the bottom of the hills as there was no water escape The problem continued -Under the condition and the continuous decrease of the forest coverage in Gishwati area, soil erosion, land slides and flooding phenomenon became more and more problematic Drastic change of the natural vegetation cover From 1986- up to 2006 The problem continued - In September 2007, in Nyabihu District, 22 people died, infrastructures destroyed and houses demolished , leaving many people homeless and agricultural land were damaged due to a sudden flooding caused by heavy downpour & Climate Change. -This situation was more severe in Gishwati area, similar challenges exist else where in Rwanda as this country is recognized as the ‘country of a thousand hills’. The problem continued Demolished farmers’ houses and farms Demolished farms Objectives -Study to analyze effectiveness of the best alternatives for the community at each zone to tackle with climate change impacts and produce a Land suitability plan and Land use Map of the area -Participatory community mobilization and awareness meetings in Gishwati Area in order to cope with new conservation measures at the targeted areas as well as to realize sustainable livelihood of the community was carried out Methodology and implementation -Writing a plan of approach for the revision of the existing Land Use plan to focus on the rehabilitation of degraded zones - Establishment of a demonstration area in this plan of approach - PRA’s for the selection of a suitable demonstration area - Establishment of partnerships with other initiatives in the area for the rehabilitation and relocation of the community - Evaluating the existing Land Use Plan - Elaboration of a follow – up work plan for the implementation of the Land Use Plan Target groups of the project These were all local communities in the project area -NGOs & CSOs -Youths and Women groups -Local leaders Techniques/approaches used to adopt project activities -Collaboration -Participatory / involvement of farmers and their representatives - engaging other organizations or initiatives working in the area. - A stakeholder committee at the project site composed of farmer representatives &PMT -Workshops and meetings for involving participation of stakeholders An inception workshop -Setting up a multi-stakeholders project steering Techniques/approaches An inception workshop Techniques/approaches Meetings with local leaders Techniques/approaches Meetings with local communities Project stakeholders & methods used to involve them -NYABIHU District Authorities, Nyabihu Sector authorities,UNEP/UNDP country office, REMAUNFCCC Focal Secretariat, RNRA,RAB, NUR, RDB, NGOs, CBO, Media Agencies and GEF/UNDP/SGP, -GEF-LDCF &Japan/AAP,MINAGRI, GWLM, Youths and Women groups - Involvement through consultation, Meetings and workshops Replicability potential of the proposed project -Land suitability plan with concrete Land uses alternatives - Demonstration activities -Institutionalized monitoring and evaluation system of the project activities -concrete measures about how to deal with climate change impacts Replicability potential of the proposed project Replicability potential of the proposed project Where the action took place The solution The solution The solution Land use bloc category Area Perimeter (ha) (m) Crop land(yellow) 1,953 19,526.2 Range land(light green 1,484 14,838.5 Forest land(darkish green) 3,206 32,063.2 Total 6,643 Rangeland/grass development Rangeland/grass development Land husbandry in crop Land Constructed graded terraces were planted with Maize in CIP program: 432 ha Crop husbandry in crop land Harmonizing the healthy co-existence of the agrarian communities with the fragile ecosystem of Gishwati The solution The Big Picture -More than 1000 families were relocated from the project site -7 senior Government officials,15 Government extension staff,18 local government and opinion leaders,60CSOs &NGOS,7 Private Sector & Media Emerging opportunities -GLWM project in place being guided by the updated plan -LDCF and AAP projects where RENGOF is on steering and technical committee -Gishwati Reforestation &Afforestation Project funded by IUCN and other partners. - Etc Replication and up-scaling potential -Rwanda being the country of a thousand hills its easily to be replicated to other areas of the country. - Already technology is being used by different organizations in different parts of the country including Gishwati area and Rubavu Mountain etc. -GEF Small Grants Programme (SGP) is also seeking a chance to establish climate change projects in Gishwati forest to restore the environment as well as achieving sustainable livelihood . Sustainability and cross-cutting themes The importance of climate change adaptation is clearly stated in the national Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy (EDPRS) (2008-12) - Strongly in line with the government priority. -The Government of Rwanda established the National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPA) -Agriculture &Food Security Thank you for your attention