Download Evaluating Russia’s Bid for a Multinational Nuclear Waste

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Waiting for the Nuclear
Renaissance:
Exploring the Nexus of Expansion
and Disposal in Europe
Jane I. Dawson
Weinmann Professor of Government &
Environmental Studies
The Nuclear Doldrums
1979-2003
Popular Opposition in U.S. & Western
Europe
Cost
Three Mile Island & Chernobyl
Nuclear Power:
The Answer to Climate Change?
The new “low-carb” alternative
A “Renaissance” for Nuclear
Power?
• Currently 443 nuclear reactors – 30
countries
• 29 new reactors under construction majority in Asia
• U.S: First licensing applications for new
reactor construction since 1979
• Europe: Finland’s Olkiluoto-3 and plans for
new builds across Europe
Impact of the GHG Crisis:
• Unraveling united front of environmental
ngos – Splits emerging on nuclear issue
• Governments recalculating pros & cons of
nuclear energy
Kyoto, Copenhagen, & Beyond
Promising Signs of
Impending Climate
Change Action in the
U.S.A.
EPA & the Clean
Air Act
U.S. Legislation:
• Waxman-Markey Bill of 2009
GHG Protocols & Targets
WAITING for the Nuclear
Renaissance
Nuclear Waste:
The Industry’s “Achilles’ Heel”
The principle of “national
responsibility”
• Public opposition and failed siting attempts
• The European Union’s failed “Nuclear
Package”
Two Small Countries Leading
the Way
• KBS-3 Technology
Environmental Justice
• Standard Definition:
A fair and equitable distribution of environmental
benefits, burdens, and decision-making power
across all members of society
Finland’s Onkalo Facility: “Not just
a hole in the ground”
Lessons?
• Siting Process: Voluntarist
• Nuclear Oases vs. Virgin Sites
• Democracy & Veto Power
• TRUST
How universal a model?
U.K. & the Voluntarist Approach
Wanted: Communities to volunteer to host
a giant underground nuclear bunker.
Guaranteed jobs for thousands of
years; attractive annual payment
package; should be in geologically
stable area.
Need to know: 10bn plus construction
package will involve excavation of
hundreds of millions of tonnes of rock,
and the building of new roads, railway
lines and workshops. Site may attract
terrorists; potential safety risk for one
million years or more.
The London Guardian, June 26, 2007
The Nuclear Nexus
• Finnish Parliament
approves Onkalo
Repository (May
2001)
• Finnish Parliament
approves fifth reactor
(May 2002)
The Yucca Mountain
Debacle
A New Day for Nuclear?
Will it be this?
Or this?
Thank you!