Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Health and the Global Water Supply Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Washington Seattle, WA for presentation at Lecture Series on Global Health Issues confronting the World Community University of Washington Extension Service November 8, 2004 Outline of this talk • The global (and regional) water and energy cycles • Human needs for potable water • Water and food • Water development • Water and climate • Water quality and health • Conclusions – the path forward 1. The global (and regional) water and energy cycles Source: NRC 1975 From Bras, 1990 From Taikan Oki, AMS 2005 Annual Water Balance for Major Continental Land Areas 1800 1600 1400 (mm/year) 1200 Precip 1000 ET 800 Runoff 600 400 200 0 Europe & Iceland Asia Africa North & Central America South America Australia World Surface Area and Annual Runoff Volume of Major Continents Million square km (area) or Thousand cubic km (runoff) 140 120 100 80 Surface Area Runoff Volume 60 40 20 0 Europe & Iceland Asia Africa North & South Australia Central America America World Column water balance (e.g. of a region) Source: Kooiti Masuda, 2002 Water balance of major global rivers Source: Kooiti Masuda, 2002 Water balance of major global rivers Source: Kooiti Masuda, 2002 2. Human needs for potable water • Domestic consumptive use (U.S.) is ~200-250 liters/day • Compare with drinking water requirement (about 5 l/day). U.S. domestic consumption has declined slightly over the last two decades. Much of difference between potable water requirement and use is sanitation, laundry, etc. • Industrial requirement in developed world is of same order as domestic • Total water withdrawals are about 6000 km3/yr • Compare with global (land) precip ~150,000 km3/yr (or global runoff ~0.4 x runoff) Table courtesy Peter Gleick Table courtesy Peter Gleick Table courtesy Peter Gleick 3. Water and food Blue and Green water (after Falkenmark) • Green Water is rainfall that is stored in the soil and available to plants. Globally, it makes up some 65 per cent of fresh water resources. It is the basis of rain-fed farming and all terrestrial ecosystems. • Runoff, stream base flow and groundwater constitute blue water. Green water may be used only in situ: whereas blue water may be transported and used elsewhere – for irrigation, urban and industrial use, and as environmental flow in streams. Courtesy Wageningen University Figure courtesy of world soil information, Wageningen University Figure courtesy of world soil information, Wageningen University Notes • Rain-fed agriculture contributes most of the world’s farm production: 95 per cent in Sub-Saharan Africa where it makes use of only 15-30 per cent of rainfall, the rest is lost, mostly as destructive runoff; • The partitioning of rainwater is a dynamic process (governed by rainfall intensity, terrain, land cover and soil) that may be controlled by management of land cover, micro topography and soil conditions; • Soils process several times more water than they retain; while soil erosion by runoff and bank erosion by peak flows contribute nearly all the sediment load of streams, leading to the siltation of reservoirs and water courses. This means that management of green water is also management of blue water; • Finally, agricultural demand for water is in competition or, even, conflict with the needs of industry, urban populations and the environment. Courtesy Wageningen University Global Runoff & Water use (http://hydro.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/GW/result) An Adaptation Strategy to Cope with Scarcity? “Virtual Water” flow in 2000 (cereals only) 78.5 USSR North America 33.5Middle Western Europe 38.8North West Africa Central Caribbean America 36.4 East West Africa South America East & South East Asia 57.5 South Asia 46.2 Oceania Importer based, over 5 km3/y km3/y 1~5 5~10 10~15 (Oki, et. al, 2002, IHE-UNESCO) 15~20 20~30 30~50 50< (Based on Statistics from FAO etc., for 2000) 4. Water development Global Reservoir Database Location (lat./lon.), Storage capacity, Area of water surface, Purpose of dam, Year of construction, … 13,382dams, (4) Δ V (km 3 ) 7 1 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 20 00 /0 7 20 00 /0 1 19 99 /0 7 19 99 /0 1 98 /0 7 19 98 /0 1 19 97 /0 7 19 97 /0 1 19 96 /0 7 19 96 /0 1 19 95 /0 7 19 95 /0 1 19 94 /0 7 19 94 /0 1 /0 19 93 /0 92 363 20 7 1 /0 7 20 20 00 00 /0 1 19 99 /0 /0 99 19 19 98 /0 7 1 7 /0 98 19 19 97 /0 1 97 19 96 19 Turkana AVE_mm/mon ΔV(km3) 日付 965 839 773 923 963 995 693 829 954 40 35 25 20 15 10 5 7 /0 1 20 00 /0 7 20 00 /0 1 19 99 /0 7 19 99 /0 1 19 98 /0 7 98 19 19 97 /0 1 7 19 97 /0 1 19 96 /0 7 19 96 /0 1 19 95 /0 7 19 95 /0 1 19 94 /0 7 19 94 /0 1 19 93 /0 7 /0 93 19 /0 92 /0 1 0 Δ V (km3 ) 30 19 92 /0 7 /0 1 96 19 19 95 /0 /0 7 7 1 19 95 /0 1 19 94 /0 7 19 19 94 /0 1 /0 93 /0 93 92 /0 7 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 19 Δ V (k m 3 ) 40 19 92 平 均 降 水 量 (mm/ mo n ) Δ V (km 3 ) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 120 60 (3) Turkana 7 1 20 00 /0 7 20 00 /0 1 19 99 /0 7 19 99 /0 1 19 98 /0 7 19 98 /0 1 19 97 /0 7 19 97 /0 1 19 96 /0 7 19 96 /0 1 19 95 /0 7 19 95 /0 1 19 94 /0 7 19 94 /0 1 19 93 /0 7 19 93 /0 1 /0 /0 19 Volta (4) Volta 92 /0 Precipitation (mm) AVE_mm/mon Δ V(km3) 日付 887 898 1040 960 1037 902 1052 1162 948 19 417 80 1 Cabora-Bassa Kariba 平 均 降 水 量 (m m / m o n ) 409 100 19 Mweru 92 412 AVE_mm/mon Δ V(km3) 日付 713 711 801 705 728 750 767 805 665 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 平 均 降 水 量 (mm / mon ) Malawi Tanganyka 19 394 (2) Nasser Volta 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 374 Nasser Victoria dV(km3) 19 Turkana 19 (3) 19 Kainji 92 /0 7 Tana 1 (1) /0 (2) 325 93 平 均 降 水 量 (m m / m o n ) Nasser 382 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 AVE_mm/mon Δ V(km3) 日付 419 19 (1) Chad Variation of Reservoir Storage (estimated by RS, 1992-2000) Chad Chad Global Water System Project IGBP – IHDP – WCRP - Diversitas Global Water System Project IGBP – IHDP – WCRP - Diversitas Human modification of hydrological systems Historic Naturalized Flow Estimated Range of Naturalized Flow With 2040’s Warming Regulated Flow Figure 1: mean seasonal hydrographs of the Columbia River prior to (blue) and after the completion of reservoirs that now have storage capacity equal to about one-third of the river’s mean annual flow (red), and the projected range of impacts on naturalized flows predicted to result from a range of global warming scenarios over the next century. Climate change scenarios IPCC Data and Distribution Center, hydrologic simulations courtesy of A. Hamlet, University of Washington. Reservoir construction has slowed. 800 . 700 Number of Reservoirs 600 500 Australia/New Zealand Africa Asia Europe Central and South America North America 400 300 200 100 0 Up to 1901- 1911- 1921- 1931- 1941- 1951- 1961- 1971- 1981- 19901900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 1998 All reservoirs larger than 0.1 km3 Visual from Palmieri, NAS Sackler symposium, 2004 5. Water and climate Global Climate Change Selected Basins 90 -150 -120 -90 -60 -30 0 30 1 60 60 0 120 150 5 4 2 30 90 7 9 6 8 90 60 30 0 3 -30 -30 -60 -60 -90 -150 -120 -90 1 2 3 4 5 -60 -30 MacKenzie Mississippi Amazon Severnaya Dvina Yenisei 0 30 60 90 6 7 8 9 120 150 Amur Yellow Xi Mekong -90 Selected Basins Basin Characteristics River Basin Predominant Climatic Zones Area (km2) upstream of gauge Amazon Tropical 4.62 106 Amur Arctic Mid-Latitude rainy 1.73 106 Mackenzie Arctic 1.57 106 Mekong Tropical 0.55 106 Mississippi Mid-Latitude rainy 2.96 106 Severnaya Dvina Arctic 0.35 106 Xi Mid-Latitude rainy 0.33 106 Yellow Arid-cold Mid-Latitude rainy 0.73 106 Yenisei Arctic 2.44 106 GCM Predicted Climate Change Change in precipitation (%) Change in precipitation and temperature for selected basins 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 40 30 20 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 0 Amazon Amur Mackenzie Mekong Mississippi Severnaya Dvina Xi Yellow Yenisei 1 2 3 4 5 GFDL_CGCM CCCMA-CGCM1 2025 6 7 8 0 1 2 HCCPR-CM2 CCSR-CGCM 2045 3 4 5 6 7 8 Change in temperature (C) 2095 0 1 HCCPR-CM3 CSIRO-CGCM 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MPI-ECHAM4 DOE-PCM3 Predicted Precipitation Changes 2045 Amur MacKenzie 100 0 mm 300 200 Mekong Mississippi 50 25 0 -25 -50 Severnaya Dvina 100 0 mm 300 200 Xi Yellow 50 25 0 -25 -50 Yenisei 100 0 J F M AM J J AS O N D J F M AM J J A S O N D J F M AM J J A SO N D HCCPR-CM2 HCCPR-CM3 MPI-ECHAM4 50 25 0 -25 -50 % change Amazon % change 200 % change mm 300 DOE-PCM3 Predicted Temperature Changes Amazon Amur MacKenzie °C 4 0 40 20 0 -20 -40 Mekong Mississippi -4 Severnaya Dvina 8 4 °C 0 40 20 0 -20 -40 Xi Yellow °C 8 °C 40 20 0 -20 -40 -4 Yenisei 8 4 0 J F M AM J J AS O N D J F M AM J J A S O N D J F M AM J J A SO N D HCCPR-CM2 HCCPR-CM3 MPI-ECHAM4 °C °C 2045 -4 DOE-PCM3 Simulated Streamflow m3/s 2025 300000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 4000 Amazon 200000 100000 m3/s 0 40000 Mekong 30000 20000 10000 m3/s 0 15000 Xi 10000 5000 0 J F M AM J J A S O N D Baseline Amur 30000 20000 10000 Mississippi 0 20000 Severnaya Dvina 15000 10000 5000 Yellow 0 100000 3000 75000 2000 50000 1000 25000 0 MacKenzie J F M AM J J A S O N D 0 Yenisei J F M AM J J A S O N D HCCPR-CM2 MPI-ECHAM4 HCCPR-CM3 DOE-PCM3 Simulated Streamflow 2045 m3/s 300000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 50000 40000 30000 20000 10000 0 4000 Amazon 200000 100000 m3/s 0 40000 Mekong 30000 20000 10000 m3/s 0 15000 Xi 10000 5000 0 J F M AM J J A S O N D Baseline 30000 Amur 20000 10000 0 20000 Mississippi Severnaya Dvina 15000 10000 5000 0 100000 Yellow 3000 75000 2000 50000 1000 25000 0 MacKenzie J F M AM J J A S O N D 0 Yenisei J F M AM J J A S O N D HCCPR-CM2 MPI-ECHAM4 HCCPR-CM3 DOE-PCM3 Western U.S. regional study GCM grid mesh over western U.S. (NCAR/DOE Parallel Climate Model at ~ 2.8 degrees lat-long) BAU 3-run average historical (1950-99) control (2000-2048) PCM Business-as-Usual scenarios Columbia River Basin (Basin Averages) PCM Business-AsUsual Mean Monthly Hydrographs Columbia River Basin @ The Dalles, OR 1 month 12 1 month 12 Percent of Control Run Climate 2040-2069 140 120 PCM Control Climate and Current Operations 100 PCM Projected Climate and Current Operations PCM Projected Climate with Adaptive Management 80 60 Firm Hydropower Annual Flow Deficit at McNary Percent of Control Run Climate 2070-2098 140 PCM Control Climate and Current Operations 120 PCM Projected Climate and Current Operations 100 PCM Projected Climate with Adaptive Management 80 60 Firm Hydropower Annual Flow Deficit at McNary Central Valley Water Year Type Occurrence Percent Given WY Type 0.6 hist (1906-2000) 0.5 2020s 2050s 2090s 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 Critically Dry Dry Below Normal Water Year Type Above Normal Wet Total Basin Storage Figure 8 70 Minimum 60 Average Maximum Storage, BCM 50 40 30 20 10 0 Historical Control Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Annual Releases to the Lower Basin Figure 9 14 1.2 Average Annual Release to Lower Basin (BCM/YR) Probability release to Lower Basin meets or exceeds target (probability) 12 1 target release 10 8 0.6 6 0.4 4 0.2 2 0 0 Historical Control Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Probability BCM / YR. 0.8 Annual Releases to Mexico Figure 10 1.2 Average Annual Release to Mexico (BCM/YR) 3 Probability release to Mexico meets or exceeds target (probability) BCM / YR. 2.5 2 target release 1.5 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 1 0.2 0.5 0 0 Historical Control Period 1 Period 2 Period 3 Probability 3.5 Global Water System Project IGBP – IHDP – WCRP - Diversitas Global assessment of water scarcity Crisis of Global Water Resources in 2025: Climate or Population Growth Vörösmarty, 2000 6. Water quality and health Material in this section courtesy of Pat Brezonik, University of Minnesota (presented at NAS Sackler Symposium, October 2004 The Global Picture ● Water resource issues will have large effects on many of the world’s major decisions in the next 50 years. ● 1 billion people live on less than $1/day. ● More than 1.2 billion have inadequate drinking water (poor quality, insufficient quantity, but still priced beyond the means of the poorest), and twice that many (2.5 billion) lack sanitation facilities. ● Poorly handled: could result in wars and will result in premature deaths, poor quality of life for many, and widespread degradation of aquatic ecosystems. ● Well handled: opportunities for scientific and political creativity, international collaboration, promoting cooperation rather than discord. Global Water Quality: Problems and Issues A. Definitions: Water quality has many dimensions. In general, it must be defined in relation to the use or intended use of the water Important uses of water include: ● direct human use for drinking, cooking, bathing ● recreational uses: both contact and non-contact ● agricultural: irrigation from crop production, livestock watering ● industrial uses: for manufacturing, cooling ● maintenance of healthy aquatic ecosystems ● fish production Relative to these uses, water quality is defined in terms of desirable ranges for numerous physical, chemical, and biological attributes (or allowable ranges for attributes that are inherently undesirable for some use); in contrast, water-quality problems occur when values for these attributes lie outside those ranges. Global Water Quality Problems/Issues cont. B. Effects of Poor Water Quality and Sanitation on Sickness and Disease This presentation will not focus on enumerating the effects of poor water quality on human health, but a few statistics are relevant to indicate the seriousness of the problem. Disease Millions affected ____________________________________________ Diarrhea 900a Roundworm 900 Guinea worm 4 Schistosomiasis 200 ____________________________________________ a Number of episodes per year Source: World Bank, 1992 II. Global Water Quality Problems/Issues cont. C. Six major categories of water quality attributes for which there are global issues and problems 1. Nutrients (primarily nitrogen and phosphorus) lake and coastal eutrophication hypoxia, harmful algal blooms, loss of desirable fish nitrate contamination of ground water 2. Microbial pathogens and other disease vectors bacteria, viruses, protozoa higher animal vectors (e.g., insects, snails) 3. Persistent organic pollutants legacy chemicals: PCBs, chlorinated pesticides and solvents disinfection by-products: halomethanes and haloacetic acids emerging contaminants: (mostly associated with consumer products) polybrominated phenylethers (flame retardants), perfluorinated compounds (PFOS) (“Scotchgard”), MTBE II. Global Water Quality Concerns, cont. 4. Unregulated, non- (or less) persistent bioactive compounds of consumer origin: pharmaceuticals, products for personal care, endocrine disrupters, antibiotics 5. Heavy metals and metalloids: arsenic, lead, chromium, mercury 6. Habitat degradation/destruction e.g., ecosystem fragmentation, siltation, loss of riparian or littoral vegetation, disruption of water levels and natural hydoperiod ARSENIC: a major water quality problem in parts of Bangladesh, West Bengal, Vietnam, and elsewhere—largely of natural geochemical origin, but exacerbated by human decisions regarding water management Arsenic in sedimentary aquifers in Bangladesh. Map based on > 18,000 samples. McArthur et al. Water Resources Research, in press. Arsenic Crisis Information Centre: http://www.bicn.com/acic/ http://phys4.harvard.edu/%7Ewilson/arsenic/arsenic_project_introduction.html Global and continent access to safe drinking water (DW) and sanitation, 2000* Urban DW Sanit Rural DW Sanit Population % Served Population % Served_ ________________________________________________________ Global 2,845 94 86 3,210 71 38 Africa 297 85 85 487 47 45 Asia 1,352 93 78 2,331 74 31 Europe 545 99 99 184 88 74 Latin America 391 93 87 128 62 48 North America 239 100 100 71 100 100 Oceania 21 100 100 9 67 78 ________________________________________________________ *Gleick, P.H. et al., The World’s Water 2002-3, Island Press, 2002. One consequence of poor sanitation is a decline in dissolved oxygen (DO) levels in low-income countries during the 1980s; in contrast, DO increased in highincome countries during same period. Source: World Bank (1992). Data for rivers at the continental level mostly show little change in nitrate between the periods 1976-90 and 1991-2000; median values were not statistically different. European rivers had highest nitrate loads to the oceans. North American and European rivers remained fairly stable; major rivers in south-central and southeast Asia increased considerably. Comparison of major watersheds between 1976-90 and 1991-2000 shows that northern Europe and North America had lower phosphate, but the Ganges and Brahmaputra watersheds in south-central Asia had higher values. Nutrient control programs in municipal and agricultural activities may explain the observed reductions. The only information on biological characteristics of global water quality in the UNEP report shows a marked decline in an index of aquatic species populations for all continents except North America, but even on that continent there has been a declining trend since 1985. 7. Conclusions and the path forward Material in this section courtesy of Dr. Peter Gleick, Pacific Institute The Nature of the Resource • 97.5 percent of all water on the planet is salt water. • The vast majority of fresh water is inaccessible to humans. • Water is unevenly distributed in both space and time. • Massive infrastructure has been built in many part of the world, at huge cost. The Nature of Water Issues • The failure to meet basic human and environmental needs for water is arguably the greatest development failure of the 20th century. • Huge numbers of water-related diseases occur every year, with millions of preventable illnesses and deaths. • Aquatic ecosystems are under threat of destruction; deteriorating quality and quantity. The Nature of Water Issues (cont.) • Global climate change will affect water resources in new ways. • New solutions are available, but not widely implemented. Unmet Basic Human Needs for Water • 1.1 billion people lack access to adequate drinking water (mostly in Africa and Asia). • 2.4 billion people lack access to adequate sanitation services. • 2.2 to 5 million die annually from preventable water-related diseases. The “New Economy of Water” • There is growing pressure to let private companies and markets address water needs. • There are many forms of water privatization, with both potential benefits and risks to the public good. • There is growing opposition to private involvement in water. Do we understand the risks and benefits? Understanding the Risks of Climate Change • Climate change is a real problem. • Some climate change – perhaps a lot of climate change – is unavoidable. • Convincing evidence suggests that the climate is already changing. • Some of the most significant impacts will be on water resources. 1000 7000 900 800 6000 700 5000 600 4000 500 3000 400 300 2000 200 1000 100 0 0 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Gleick 2001 3 8000 Water Withdrawals (km /yr) $1996 U.S. GNP The link between water use and economic growth can be broken Widespread efficiency improvements are possible, in all sectors •1930s: 200 tons of water per ton of steel •1980s: 20-30 tons of water per ton of steel •2002: 2-3 tons of water per ton of steel (and we are changing the structure of our economy…) •Agricultural water use can drop and yields can increase with better irrigation technology. Things are already changing… • Our understanding of the true costs of traditional supply – the “hard path.” • Our understanding of the potential to improve efficiency of use. • The nature of our economies. • Our whole way of thinking about water – “soft” vs “hard” path.