Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
CROPPING SYSTEM ANALYSIS & CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT DATA USE • IRS Advanced Wide Field Sensor (AWiFS) data acquired from October 2004 to May 2005 • ScanSAR Narrow Beam-2 (SN2) of RADARSAT • 10-day composite (S10) NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) product of SPOT Vegetation (VGT) • Ground truth collected for each crop in each state • Survey of 1000 farmers in 100 villages • Soil and water sampling in these villages Multi-date Resourcesat AWiFS 06 SEP2004 13 NOV 2004 05 DEC 2004 14 JAN 2005 21 FEB 2005 01 May 2005 Multi-date Radarsat ScanSAR Narrow-2 (22Jun,16 Jul, 09 Aug) 10-DAY COMPOSITE NDVI PRODUCT OF SPOT VGT CROPPING SYSTEM INDICES 1. Multiple Cropping Index (MCI) n MCI ai i 1 A 100 ai= area occupied by the ith crop planted and harvested within a year n = total number of crops A= total cultivated land area 2. Area Diversity Index (ADI) ADI 1 ai i 1 n ai i 1 n 2 3. Cultivated Land Utilisation Index (CLUI) n CLUI ai.di i 1 A 365 ai= area under each crop n = number of crops in a season ai= area occupied by the i-th crop Di = days that i-th crop occupied n = total number of crops A= total cultivated land area CROPPING SYSTEM OF PUNJAB STATE Crop Rotation Statistics Rotation % of Agricultural Area Rice-Wheat Cotton-Wheat Rice-Others Others-Wheat Maize based Sugarcane based Triple Cropping Other Rotations* 50.87 10.62 8.07 19.60 2.31 2.14 2.43 3.06 • Cropping Intensity: 204% • Diversity • • Kharif : 2.23 • Rabi: 1.64 Land Utilsation Index: 0.80 Suggestions • Diversification both in Kharif and Rabi • Increase cropping intensity by adopting short-duration summer legume crop Bathinda CROPPING SYSTEM BATHINDA DISTRICT Crop Rotation Statistics Rotation % of Agricultural Area Cotton-wheat Rice-wheat Rice-others Cotton-others Other-wheat Other rotations 43.75 32.48 3.64 4.72 7.83 7.58 • Cropping Intensity: 202% • Diversity • • Kharif : 2.43 • Rabi: 1.39 Land Utilsation Index: 0.78 Suggestions • Diversification both in Kharif and Rabi • Alternative cropping pattern to substitute rice CROPPING SYSTEM OF HARYANA STATE CROPPING SYSTEM OF UTTAR PARDESH ROTATIONS Rice-Wheat Rice-Other crops Rice-Fallow Sugarcane-Sugarcane Sugarcane-Other crops Maize/Pmillet-Wheat Maize/Pmillet -Other crops Pulse-Pulse Fodder/fallow-Wheat/others Maize/Pmillet/Pulse-Fallow Fallow-Pulse Non-Agriculture District Boundary CROPPING SYSTEM OF WEST BENGAL CROP ROTATION IN INDO-GANGETIC PLAINS Rice-Wheat Sugarcane Based Cotton-Wheat Rice-Potato Maize-Wheat Pearlmillet-Wheat Rice-Fallow-Rice Rice-Fallow-Fallow Rice-Fallow-Jute Rice-Wheat-Other Fallow-Pulse Fallow-Wheat Minor Crop Rotations Fallow Non-Arable Punjab Haryana Major Cropping Systems Area (% of NSA) Rice-Wheat 42.76 Rice-Fallow-Fallow 9.59 Maize-Wheat 8.13 Sugarcane Based 7.00 Pearlmillet-Wheat 3.80 Fallow-Wheat 3.36 Rice-Fallow-Rice 1.91 Cotton-Wheat 1.89 Rice-Wheat- Other 1.87 Fallow-Pulse 1.83 Rice-Fallow-Jute 0.46 Rice-Potato 0.51 Minor Cropping Systems 15.03 Uttar Pradesh Bihar West Bengal MAXIMUM NDVI (CROP VIGOUR) PATTERN Kharif Season Rabi Season RICE PLANTING PATTERN MAP Very Early (01 July) Early (28 July) Medium (17 Aug) Late (10 Sept) Non-Rice Area WHEAT SOWING PATTERN MAP Very Early Early Medium Late Non-Wheat Area Map 19 Major crop Rotations and number of rotations observed in agroclimatic subregions of IGP through ground survey Alternate Cropping Pattern Planning Punjab Rice-Wheat Cot/Maz/Puls-Wheat Maize-Sugarcane Rice-Mustard Cotton-Mustard Groundnut/Maize Bajra-Gram Baj/Fod- Mustard Vegetables Agroforestry Non-Agriculture District Boundary Major Road Climate Change Impact Analysis State of the Art : Indian Studies Scenario Model Inputs Crops Findings Assumed Temp. Rise, Double CO2, GCM Projection, RCM Projection Statistical Models, Simulation Models, Spatial Mode Temperature, Temp + CO2, Temp. +CO2+ Rainfall Rice, Wheat, Soybean, Mustard Yield Change, Phenolgy Change, Shift of Iso-yield-Lines, Adaptation Approach Objectives: 1. Sensitivity Analysis : Temperature and Crop Yield 2. Cropping System Productivity Under Future Climate Scenario 3. Uncertainty in Impact Assessment 4. Adaptation Study through Adjustment in Sowing Date Rice-Wheat Sugarcane Based Cotton-Wheat Rice-Potato Maize-Wheat Pearlmillet-Wheat Rice-Fallow-Rice Rice-Fallow-Fallow Rice-Fallow-Jute Rice-Wheat-Other Fallow-Pulse Fallow-Wheat Minor Crop Rotations Fallow Non-Arable RS Cropping System Map NBSS &LUP Soil Map Field Expt. Crop Parameters Mitigation Measures Current Weather RCM Projections CROPSYST MODEL Current Productivity Productivity 2020/2050/2080 Comparison Vulnerability Analysis Reduction in grain yield (%) Sensitivity Analysis : Temperature 70 60 Wheat Rice Maize Crop simulation Model used: CropSyst (Stockle et.al., 1994) Most sensitive crop: wheat (around 66 % reduction with 50C rise in daily temperature) Least sensitive crop: Maize (around 15 % with 50C rise in daily temperature) Pearl Millet 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 Rise in Temperature (0C) No adaptation and no CO2 impact Yield Decrease Shown by other Authors: • 8-31% decrease in wheat yield with 1-30 Temp. Rise: Pandey et al., 2009 • Increase in temperature by 0.5-2°C decreases grain yield by 8- 40% : Patil et al., 2009 • Decrease in grain yield per degree rise in temp. ranges from 0.56 q/ha (UP) to 4.29 q/ha (Haryana): Kalra et al. 2008 Cropping System Productivity under Future Climate Scenario Location Ludhiana : Bhatinda: Ballowal: Rice-Wheat Cotton-Wheat Maize-Wheat Yield (t ha-1) Location Patna : Rice-Wheat Santiniketan: Rice-Rice Climate model: HadCM3 (A2) Impact crop simulation model: CropSyst Weather parameters: Tmax, Tmin and Rain fall CO2 : 380 ppm at current situation, 420 ppm at 2020, 480 ppm 2050 and 540 at 2080 Impact of Climate Change on Crop Yield (Current vs. 2080) • Study using yield response model and RCM projection for the period 2071-2080 (A2 scenario) • Yield reduction in wheat is maximum in Eastern Rajasthan Cropping System Response (Yield reduction ,%) to Climate change 2020 Climate model: HadCM3 (A2) Impact Model: CropSyst Weather parameters: Tmax, Tmin and Rainfall CO2 : 380 ppm at current situation, 420 ppm at 2020, 480 ppm 2050 and 540 at 2080 Major rotation under study: Rice-Wheat, Maize-Wheat and Cotton- Wheat Crop rotation map: RS Data 2050 >Current (-1.12%-0) Other rotation or non-agriculture 0-5 % 5-10% 10-15 % 15-20 % 20-25 % 25-30 % 30-40 % 40-50 % 50-62 % 2080 C-R Map Punjab R-W M-W C-W Other or NA Uncertainty in the Impact Assessment Change in System Productivity (%) Due to climate model Due to impact model 0 2020 2050 2080 -5 -10 -15 CGCM2 -20 HADCM3 -25 -30 Change in System productivity of RiceWheat cropping system under A2 scenario projected by two climatic GCMs Temperature sensitivity to rice yield predicted by two crop simulation model Findings: • CGCM2 model predict more rise in maximum temperature and hence the reduction in yield simulated for the CGCM2 was more than that for the HADCM3 predicted climate scenario • Crop yield predicted by InfoCrop model is less sensitive to Adaptation Study through Adjustment in Sowing Date (R-W System) System Yield (Mg ha-1) Scenario: HadCM3_A2 Scenario: HadCM3_B2 14 14 12 12 10 10 8 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 0 2020 0 2020 Actual_wth_NSD 2050 NSD NSD-15 2050 2080 2080 NSD+7 NSD+15 NSD: Normal Sowing Date: Actual_wth_NSD NSD NSD-15 NSD+7 NSD+15 Wheat (R-W and M-W): 15 November Rice: 20 June, Maize: 20 July Findings: • 7 days delay in sowing in both rice and wheat may help to reduce the impact by 1.67% and 1.55 % in A2 and B2 scenarios, respectively during 2020. • For 2050, 15 days delay in sowing under A2 scenario resulted in 6 % increase and 7 days delay in sowing under B2 scenario resulted in 11 % increase. • For 2080, 15 days delay in sowing resulted in maximum improvement in both A2 and B2 (9.27 and 6.48%, respectively) scenarios as compared to normal sowing date. Future Studies • Impact of Extreme Climates • Understanding the vulnerability of Rainfed Agroecosystems • Mitigation: Soil Carbon Sequestration