* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Impacts of Changes in US-Mexico Corn Trade Under NAFTA
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Resolving the Food Crisis: Assessing Global Policy Reforms Since 2007 Timothy A. Wise Global Development and Environment Institute Tufts University © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Policy Report by Timothy A. Wise Sophia Murphy January 2012 Published by: Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP) Tufts University’s Global Development and Environment Institute (GDAE) Available at: http://www.ase.tufts.edu/gdae/policy_research/resolving_food_crisis.html © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Assessing Global Policy Reforms Since 2007 • Research question: What has truly changed in policy and practice since 2007 price spikes? Assessed progress in five institutions: • • • • • • • International Donors World Bank and Multilateral Development Banks United Nations (FAO, Committee on Food Security) G-20 Countries UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food Main conclusions: • • • Significant progress in funding, priorities, but… Key reforms still urgently needed Underlying causes of food crisis not yet addressed © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University LDC’s Soaring Food Import Bills Agricultural Trade Balance of Least Developed Countries, 1961-2009 30 value (USD billions) 25 20 15 10 Imports Net deficit 5 Exports 0 1961 1965 1969 1973 1977 1981 1985 1989 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 Source: FAO (2011), TradeSTAT © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Growing Donor Commitments to Agriculture © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Some new wine, in mostly old bottles: • Only $6.1 b of $22 b L’Aquila pledges represent new money, over three years • Barely returns to levels of early 1990s • Austerity budgets threaten even those gains © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Structural Changes: Integration of: • food • fuel • finance © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University . © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Financial Speculation Fuels Market Distortions © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Three Priorities for Urgent Action 1. Slow biofuel expansion, especially in crops that contribute to underlying rise in demand, e.g. corn ethanol. © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University U.S. corn for ethanol a particular driver of high food prices Less than 20% now for food or seed; more for ethanol than feed. © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Three Priorities for Urgent Action 1. Slow biofuel expansion, especially in crops that contribute to underlying rise in demand, e.g. corn ethanol. Address volatility: 2. 1. 2. Strong regulations to limit financial speculation – market transparency, position limits, margins, and more Active development of publicly held food reserves, not just for emergency humanitarian uses, but as buffer stocks. © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University New England Complex Systems Institute © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Three Priorities for Urgent Action 1. Slow biofuel expansion, especially in crops that contribute to underlying rise in demand, e.g. corn ethanol. Address volatility: 2. 1. 2. Strong regulations to limit financial speculation – market transparency, position limits, margins, and more Active development of publicly held food reserves, not just for emergency humanitarian uses, but as buffer stocks. Moratoria on “land grabs:” 3. 1. 2. 3. 4. 227 million hectares since 2001 $91 billion in 2008 alone, dwarfing ODA to agriculture “development in reverse” – land banking, displacement Guidelines for “responsible agricultural investment” too little and much too late to address urgency of problem © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Let Developing Countries Lead African Union response to G-20: “African countries are not looking forward to depending continuously on external supplies that will remain uncertain in prices and quantities. Actually, our ultimate and unquestionable ambition is to develop our agriculture and markets…. In our opinion, we must rely on our own production to meet our food needs. In fact, importation is not Africa’s goal.” © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food Olivier de Schutter’s priorities for policy-makers: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Support countries’ ability to feed themselves. Establish food reserves. Regulate financial speculation. Ensure national social safety nets against declining export revenues and rising food import bills. Support farmers’ organizations. Protect access to land, putting a moratorium on largescale foreign land purchases. Promote the transition to environmentally sustainable agriculture. Defend the human right to food. © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Thank you. © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Funding: Progress, but not enough Encouraging signs: • Growing commitment to Agric and Rural Development • Recognition that smallholders and women are important • Respect for “country-led programs”, less top-down, e.g. CAADP, GAFSP • Acceptance of strong state role in agric development • Acknowledgment of resource constraints, climate change But problematic policies persist: • • • • • Heavy reliance on market-based solutions Bias toward external technologies, high-input agriculture; Limited priority to domestic food production Little concrete action on climate change, esp. adaptation Continued support for biofuels expansion © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Weaknesses in Global Response to Crisis Need more decisive action on key issues: • Funding for Agri. Rural Development • Curbing Food Price Increases and Reducing Volatility • Reducing the Impact of Energy Crops on Food Prices • Stopping “Land Grabs” and Promoting “Responsible Agricultural Investment” • Promoting a Transition to Agro-Ecology • Addressing Climate Change and Agriculture • New policies on Trade and Food • Addressing Market Power in the Food System © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Drivers of Price Increases, Volatility Short-term causes: • • • • • Low inventories of key food crops Export restrictions, border measures during crisis Weather, possibly due to climate change Depreciation of the dollar Financial speculation in commodities markets Long-term causes • • • • • • Expansion of crop and land use for biofuels Decline in food-producing capacity; import dependency Growth of meat-based diets in large developing countries Slowing yield growth for key food crops Reductions in publicly funded R&D Climate change © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University World Bank: Land Acquisitions © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Figure 1. Forestry and Agriculture as a Percent of Total Greenhouse Gas Emissions Fossil fuel supply 5% Waste 3% Building 8% Power Supply 21% Power Supply Industry Forestry Transport 13% Agriculture Transport Industry 19% Agriculture 14% Building Fossil fuel supply Waste Forestry 17% Source: Figure adapted from UN Framework Convention on Climate Change , UNFCCC 2007 © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Figure 19. Global GHG Mitigation Potential from Agriculture 1600 GHG Emission Potential- Mt CO2-eq/yr 1400 1200 1000 800 600 N2O CH4 400 CO2 200 0 -200 Source: Adapted from Metz et al. 2007a and Smith et al. 2008, available at http://www.ipcc.ch/graphics/ar4-wg3/jpg/fig-8-4.jpg © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University Global Production of Biofuels 180000 160000 Production (millions of litres) 140000 120000 Biodiesel 100000 Ethanol 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University © Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University