Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Ireland Results of invasive Enterococcus faecium bacteraemia surveillance (2009Q1-4) **** Data as of 14/04/2010 **** Ireland is a member of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (EARSS) EARSS E. faecium: Objective and case definition Objective: To determine the proportions of E. faecium isolates from blood that are resistant to 3 key antibiotic classes: ◦ Ampicillin ◦ High-level gentamicin ◦ Vancomycin Case definition: EARSS collects data on the first invasive isolate (from blood only) of E. faecium per patient per quarter Caveats in interpreting EARSS data Care must be exercised when interpreting the raw figures, i.e. increases in numbers of isolates, as the numbers of laboratories reporting to EARSS has increased over the years EARSS data does not distinguish clinically significant isolates from contaminants If a resistant isolate is identified subsequent to a susceptible one within the same quarter, then that isolate is not counted (and similarly if susceptible isolates is identified subsequent to resistant one) For further information on antimicrobial resistance and EARSS in Ireland, including quarterly and annual reports, plus reference/ resource material on the individual pathogens under surveillance, see: http://www.ndsc.ie/hpsc/AZ/MicrobiologyAntimicrobialResistance/EuropeanAntimic robialResistanceSurveillanceSystemEARSS/ Antibiotic codes and abbreviations: AMP, Ampicillin LNZ, Linezolid TEC, Teicoplanin HLG, High-Level Gentamicin QDA, Quinupristin-Dalfopristin VAN, Vancomycin AMR, Antimicrobial Resistance MDR, Multi-Drug Resistance EFM, Enterococcus faecium VREfm,Vancomycin-Resistant E. faecium VSEfm,Vancomycin-Susceptible E. faecium MDR, Multi-Drug Resistance Numbers and resistance proportions of E. faecium from bacteraemia, 2002-2009* Time period 2002 Number Number of of labs isolates %AMP-R* %VAN-R* %HLG-R* 21 85 88.9 11.1 16.7 %MDR* 3.7 2003 27 135 91.0 19.4 53.8 11.4 2004 40 187 95.7 23.2 58.0 18.5 2005 42 224 92.3 31.7 51.4 25.6 2006 42 265 93.9 37.1 44.3 25.6 2007 44 332 93.1 33.5 34.9 22.3 2008 42 406 95.1 35.7 28.4 16.2 2009** 44 397 92.9 39.1 38.3 26.7 2009Q1 44 118 91.5 38.1 30.6 22.5 2009Q2 44 111 93.6 34.2 38.0 23.1 2009Q3 44 74 91.9 37.8 42.0 26.1 2009Q4 44 94 94.4 48.9 43.6 36.8 * Not all isolates tested; ** Data for 2009 provisional up to the end of Q4 E. faecium bacteraemia resistance trends, 2002-2009* 21 27 40 41 42 44 42 44 44 44 44 44 100% 400 90% 350 80% 70% 300 60% 250 50% 200 40% 150 30% 100 20% 50 10% 0 0% Time period Total E. faecium %AMP-R %HLG-R %VAN-R * Data for 2009 provisional up to the end of Q4; Number of laboratories participating by year-end and quarter are indicated above the bars %Resistance Number of isolates 450 Invasive MDR E. faecium trends, 2002-2009* 21 27 40 41 42 44 42 44 44 44 44 50% 45% 350 Number of isolates 44 40% 300 35% 250 30% 200 25% 150 20% 15% 100 10% 50 5% 0 0% Time period Total E. faecium tested for MDR MDR %MDR * Data for 2009 provisional up to the end of Q4; Number of laboratories participating by year-end and quarter are indicated above the bars %Resistance 400 Numbers and proportions of VREfm bacteraemia by hospital type, 2009Q1-4 Number of isolates VREfm VSEfm %VREfm 284 140 144 49.3% Secondary 82 12 70 14.6% Paediatric 14 0 10 0.0% General (Private) 10 0 14 0.0% Primary 5 0 5 0.0% Radiotherapy/Oncology 2 0 2 0.0% 397 152 245 38.3% Hospital Type Specialist/Tertiary Total Numbers and proportions of MDR E. faecium bacteraemia by hospital type, 2009Q1-4 Number of isolates MDR Non-MDR %MDR 284 93 181 33.9% Secondary 82 7 68 9.3% Paediatric 14 0 11 0.0% General (Private) 10 0 8 0.0% Primary 5 0 5 0.0% Radiotherapy/Oncology 2 0 2 0.0% 397 100 275 26.7% Hospital Type Specialist/Tertiary Total Susceptibility data for E. faecium bacteraemia isolates, 2009 (n=397) 450 400 92.9% 39.1% 38.3% 5.2% Number of isolates 350 39.5% 300 250 200 150 3.5% 100 50 0 AMP HLG Resistant VAN TEC Antibiotic Susceptible LNZ No data QDA Resistance profiles of E. faecium isolates in 2009Q1-4 Resistance Profile Fully susceptible Number of isolates 23 A 160 G 1 V 2 AG 47 AV 42 GV 0 AGV* Not tested against all Total 100 22 397 A, Ampicillin; G, High-Level Gentamicin; V, Vancomycin * Multi-drug resistant (defined as resistance to all 3 classes) Trends in NUMBERS of main resistance profiles of E. faecium isolates, 2002-2009* 21 Number of isolates with resistance profile 200 27 40 41 42 44 42 44 44 44 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 A * Data for 2009 provisional up to the end of Q4 Time period AG AV AGV 44 44 Trends in PROPORTIONS of main resistance profiles of E. faecium isolates, 2002-2009* % isolates with resistance profile 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Time period A * Data for 2009 provisional up to the end of Q4 AG AV AGV Age and sex distribution of patients with invasive E. faecium infection in 2008 40 Number of isolates 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Age Group female male Age and sex-specific incidence rates of E. faecium bacteraemia in 2008 100 90 80 70 ASIR 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Age Group female male ASIR, Age-Specific Incidence Rate (per 100,000 population) TOTAL Mean, median, mode and range of ages of patients with E. faecium bacteraemia in 2008 VREfm VSEfm MDR EFM Non-MDR EFM n 145 261 61 240 406 n with age 145 261 61 240 406 60.1y 60.0y 58.9y 61.4y 60.0y Mean Median EFM 63y (60-64y) 65y (62-70y) 60y (53-64y) 66y (62-71y) 64y (62-65y) Mode 63y 74y 52y 74y 71y Range 0-89y 0-98y 0-87y 0-98y 0-98y Sex distribution of patients with E. faecium bacteraemia in 2008 Non-MDR EFM MDR EFM VREfm VSEfm 80 149 65 178 229 55.2 57.1 44.8 56.3 56.4 65 112 80 138 177 %female 44.8 42.9 55.2 43.7 43.6 m/f ratio 1.23 1.33 0.81 1.29 1.29 z-test 1.25 2.31 1.17 2.27 2.60 P-value 0.21 0.021 0.24 0.023 0.009 No. male %male No. female EFM In patients with laboratory-confirmed invasive E. faecium infection in 2008, males were approximately 1.3-times more likely to get an infection than females (significant, P=0.009). E. faecium - distribution of high-level gentamicin resistance in EARSS countries, 2008 Map downloaded from http://www.rivm.nl/earss/database/ on 24/08/2009 E. faecium - distribution of high-level gentamicin resistance in EARSS countries, 2007 Map downloaded from http://www.rivm.nl/earss/database/ on 28/08/2008 E. faecium - distribution of vancomycin resistance in EARSS countries, 2008 Map downloaded from http://www.rivm.nl/earss/database/ on 24/08/2009 E. faecium - distribution of vancomycin resistance in EARSS countries, 2007 Map downloaded from http://www.rivm.nl/earss/database/ on 28/08/2008