* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download WEEK 1 SUMMARY - Oregon State University
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Superheterodyne receiver wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Valve RF amplifier wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Radio transmitter design wikipedia , lookup
Regenerative circuit wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Phase-locked loop wikipedia , lookup
Mathematics of radio engineering wikipedia , lookup
Index of electronics articles wikipedia , lookup
Rectiverter wikipedia , lookup
Are oscillations ubiquitous or are they merely a paradigm? Superposition of 1 brain neuron activity LRC Resonance Lab • Average 74/100 (note BlackBoard Score 5 pts lower, pre-lab) (scores 85-95: all elements excellent scores <69 I was not convinced you found a physical to explain your data) • NOT about finding a mathematical model for LRC circuit • Lab is about finding a physical model to explain your observations of (i) current enhancement (ii) phase shift ; Why do these occur? What’s happening the circuit? What is the origin of resonance? • Explain why your results are physically interesting and useful WEEK 1 SUMMARY Energy approach to equation of motion: i.e. find trajectory x(t) if U(x) is known • dt = dx 2 ± E - U(x)] [ m • Special case of U(x)=(½)kx2 found period T (indep of A), found x(t) = A cos(wt+f) • Found 3 other forms of A cos(wt+f) • Learned to apply initial conditions to determine A, f, and also the arbitrary parameters in other 3 forms • Harder case of U(q)= MgLcm(1-cos q) found -> HO for small theta found T numerically measured T for pendulum • Learned to argue qualitatively about time to move certain distances, comparing T for diff U • Did NOT learn equation of motion q(t) Energy Energy approach to equation of motion: position Complex numbers: • rectangular and polar form and Argand diag. • complex conjugate • Euler relation exp(if) = cos f + isin f • solving one complex equation is actually solving 2 simultaneous equations WEEK 2 SUMMARY Free, undamped oscillators k m L No friction k m x I C q 1 q=q LC mx = -kx r; r = L q Common notation for all T m mg g q»- q L y +w y = 0 2 0 Force approach to equation of motion of FREE, UNDAMPED HARMONIC OSCILLATOR: i.e. find trajectory q(t) if F(q) is known • Special case of F(q)=-sin(q) -> small angle approx: F(q)=-q =>2nd order DE, Found sinusoidal motion q (t) = Ceiw 0t + C *e-iw 0t q (t) = A cos (w 0t + f ) Applied initial conditions as before. E = K +U = 12 Iq 2 + 12 mgLq 2 Free, damped oscillators k friction m x mx = -kx - bx r = Lcm q T m mg 1 LI + q + RI = 0 C R 1 q+ q+ q=0 L LC Common notation for all g q » - q - b'q L y + 2by + w y = 0 2 0 Force approach to equation of motion of FREE, DAMPED OSCILLATOR • Add damping force to eqn of motion • Found decaying sinusoid x(t) = Ce =e - b t +iw1t - bt x(t) = Ae éëCe - bt * - b t-iw 1t +C e +iw 1t * -iw 1t +C e [cos(w1t + d )] ùû FREE, DAMPED OSCILLATOR • Damping time t=1/b • measures number of oscillations in Q = p decay time • apply initial conditions, energy decay x(t) = Ae - bt t w0 = T 2b [cos(w1t + d )] WEEK 3 SUMMARY DRIVEN, DAMPED OSCILLATOR L I C Vocoswt R q V0 e - Lq - - Rq = 0 C V0 iw t 2 q + 2b q + w 0 q = e L iw t q ( t ) = Re éë q0 e e ùû ifq iw t -2 bw q0 = ; tanfq = 2 1/2 2 2 w w é(w 2 - w 2 ) + 4 b 2w 2 ù 0 14 ë 0 û V0 L "Resonance" CHARGE Charge Amplitude |q0| q0 = w0 Charge Phase fq 0 V0 L é( w 2 - w ë 0 ) 2 2 + 4 b 2w 2 ù û Driving Frequency w------> é -2bw ù fq = arctan ê 2 2 ú ëw 0 - w û -π/2 -π w0 1/2 dq ( t ) I (t ) = = iw q ( t ) dt “Resonance” CURRENT Current Amplitude |I0| I0 = w0 Current Phase fI π/2 0 -π/2 wV0 L é (w 2 - w ë 0 ) 2 2 1/2 + 4 b 2w 2 ù û Driving Frequency w------> p é -2 bw ù fI = + arctan ê 2 2 ú 2 ëw 0 - w û ADMITTANCE I Y (w ) = Vapp NOT time dependent, but IS freq dependent. “Resonance” Admittance Amplitude |Y0| Y = w0 Addmittanceπ/2 Phase fI 0 -π/2 w L é (w 2 - w ë 0 ) 2 2 1/2 + 4 b 2w 2 ù û Driving Frequency w------> p é -2 bw ù fI = + arctan ê 2 2 ú 2 ëw 0 - w û DRIVEN, DAMPED OSCILLATOR • can also rewrite diff eq in terms of I and solve directly (same result of course) L I Vocoswt C R q V0 e - Lq - - Rq = 0 C V0 iw t 2 q + 2b q + w 0 q = e L V0 iw t 2 Þ q + 2 b q + w 0 q = iw e L I V0 iw t I + 2b I + = iw e LC L iw t FOURIER SERIES – periodic functions are sums of sines and cosines of integer multiples of a fundamental frequency. These “basis functions are orthonormal f ( t ) = å an cosnw t + bn sin nw t n T 2 sin ( pw t ) sin ( qw t ) dt = d pq ò T 0 T 2 cos ( pw t ) cos ( qw t ) dt = d pq ò T ODD functions f(t) = -f(-t). Their Fourier representation must also be in terms of odd functions, namely sines. Suppose we have an odd periodic function f(t) like our sawtooth wave and you have to find its Fourier series å bn sin(nwt ) n=1,2... Then the unknown coefficients can be evaluated this way Integrate over the period of the fundamental Here’s the coefficient of the sin(wnt) term! Plot it on your spectrum! 2 bn = T normalize properly T ò f (t)sin ( nw t ) dt 0 the function the harmonic Time domain ( f ( t ) = å 2 sin nw f t np n Frequency domain ) 2A f (t ) = A t 0 < t < Tf Tf B frequency Fundamantal freq = 2π/T coefficient of the sin(wnt) term! Integrate over the period of the fundamental 2 bn = T normalize properly T ò f (t)sin ( nw t ) dt 0 the function the harmonic DRIVING AN OCILLATOR WITH A PERIODIC FORCING FUNCTION THAT IS NOT A PURE SINE Oscillator response Important to know where the fundamental freq of the forcing function lies in relation to the oscillator max response freq! B Forcing function frequency DRIVING AN OCILLATOR WITH A PERIODIC FORCING FUNCTION THAT IS NOT A PURE SINE Vapp = V0 e iw f t + 2V0 e i 2w f t iw t (given) i 2w t q + 2 b q + w 02 q = V0 e f + 2V0 e f (Kirchoff) Þ q = qw + q2w (linear diff eq - superposition) Þ I = I w f + I 2w f I =q I = Yw f Vapp,w f + Y2w f Vapp,2w I= + wf L 1/2 e 2 é w 2 - w 2 + 4 b 2w 2 ù f f ú êë 0 û ( ) ( 2w ) f ( é w 2 - ( 2w )2 f êë 0 ) L æp é -2 bw f ùö iç +arctan ê 2 2 ú÷ çè 2 êë w 0 -w f úû÷ø 1/2 e 2 2 + 4 b 2 ( 2w ) f ù úû V0 e iw f t æ é -2 b 2 w ùö p f ú÷ ç i +arctan ê 2 ê w 0 -( 2 w )2 ú÷ ç2 f ûø è ë 2V0 e ( ) i 2w f t FT - you know this time Black box Z(w) frequency Observe what (LRC) black box does to an impulse function Black box Z(w) ? Are these connected by FT?? They’d better be you find out! This was harmonic response expt - you know what black box (LRC) does to a single freq Series LRC Circuit Which admittance plot |Y(w)| corresponds to which free decay plot I(t)? (All plots scaled to 1 at maximum value) (A) i <-> 1, ii <-> 2 (B) i <-> 2, ii(i)<-> 1 (ii) (1) (2) Series LRC Circuit If the admittance |Y(w)| and the phase fI response of a series LCR circuit are as given on the left below, then which oscilloscope trace on the right corresponds to a circuit driven below resonance? Red is drive voltage, blue is current, represented by VR. (A) (B) (C) (D) Suppose that, if you apply a (red) sinusoidal voltage across a series LRC circuit, you measure the (blue) voltage response across the resistor. Now, if you now apply a (red) square-wave voltage with the same period to the same circuit, and you measure the (blue) voltage response across the resistor, will you get this ….? Or this? Or this? Or something else? Suppose that, if you apply a (red) sinusoidal voltage across a series LRC circuit, you measure the (blue) voltage response across the resistor. Now, if you now apply a (red) square-wave voltage at the same frequency the same circuit, and you measure the (blue) voltage response across the resistor, will you get this …. Or this? Or this? Or something else? The last note of the piece Mozart chose for his piano recital was a sustained middle C (256 Hz). While he listened for the last note to fade away to a ghost of its initial amplitude, he had time calculate the quality factor Q of that oscillation. If the energy died away to 1% of its initial value after 15 seconds, approximately what was Q? • • • • • 133 834 2600 5200 None of the above a. Which the following are not Fourier Transform pairs? (i.e. Fourier Transforms of eachother) i. cos(wot) and (w-wo)+wwo)) ii. cos(wot) and i(w-wo)+wwo)) iii. square wave impulse and sinc function iv. sin(wot)[q(t+t/2)+q(t-t/2)] and sinc function v. exp(-iwt) and exp(-iwt) eiq = cosq + i sinq f (t) = Acos (w t + f ) f (t) = Bp cos w t + Bq sin w t f (t) = Ceiw t + C *e-iw t f (t) = Re éë Deiw t ùû cos ( a - b ) x cos ( a + b ) x ; a ¹ ±b 2 ( a - b) 2 ( a + b) sin ( a - b ) x sin ( a + b ) x ò cos ( ax ) cos (bx ) dx = 2 ( a - b) + 2 ( a + b ) ; a ¹ ±b ò sin ( ax ) cos (bx ) dx = - y + 2by + w 02y = 0 t= 1 b w w Q= 0 = 0 2 b Dw f (t) = sin ( a - b ) x ò sin ( ax ) sin (bx ) dx = 2 ( a - b ) ¥ a0 ¥ + å éë an cos ( nw t ) + bn sin ( nw t ) ùû = å cn einw t 2 n=1 n=-¥ 2 an = T bn = cn = 2 T 1 T Y (w ) = T ò f (t)cos(nw t)dt 0 T ò f (t)sin(nw t)dt 0 T ò f (t)e -inw t dt 0 I out = Y (w ) eifI (w ) Vin Y (w ) = w /L é(w 2 - w 2 )2 + 4 b 2w 2 ù ë 0 û 1 1 1 1 2 2 cos q = + cos2q sin q = - cos 2q 2 2 2 2 1/2 f I (w ) = p -2bw + arctan 2 2 w0 - w 2 - sin ( a + b ) x ; a ¹ ±b 2 (a + b)