* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download FULL TEXT - Language and Cognitive Neuroscience Lab at UW
Georgian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Navajo grammar wikipedia , lookup
Macedonian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Malay grammar wikipedia , lookup
Zulu grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ojibwe grammar wikipedia , lookup
Sanskrit grammar wikipedia , lookup
Kannada grammar wikipedia , lookup
Udmurt grammar wikipedia , lookup
Esperanto grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ukrainian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Latin syntax wikipedia , lookup
Modern Hebrew grammar wikipedia , lookup
Lithuanian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Portuguese grammar wikipedia , lookup
Spanish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Romanian grammar wikipedia , lookup
Swedish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Arabic nouns and adjectives wikipedia , lookup
Arabic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Turkish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old Norse morphology wikipedia , lookup
Literary Welsh morphology wikipedia , lookup
Modern Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Yiddish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Archaic Dutch declension wikipedia , lookup
Grammatical number wikipedia , lookup
Latvian declension wikipedia , lookup
Pipil grammar wikipedia , lookup
Icelandic grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old Irish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Ancient Greek grammar wikipedia , lookup
Old English grammar wikipedia , lookup
Romanian nouns wikipedia , lookup
Polish grammar wikipedia , lookup
Scottish Gaelic grammar wikipedia , lookup
The Role of Morpho-Phonological Factors in Agreement Production: When Singular and Plural are Both Grammatical http://lcnl.wisc.edu Jelena Mirković and Maryellen C. MacDonald Language and Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, University of Wisconsin-Madison Theories I: Grammatical Features A central debate in language production research is the extent to which the computation of noun-verb agreement is an autonomous syntactic process or whether it is constrained by non-syntactic factors (e.g. Bock et al. 2001; Thornton & MacDonald, in press). The primary data for these alternatives have been the rates of agreement errors in fragment completion task (a speaker completes a complex noun phrase like "the key to the cabinets" with a verb that agrees with the local noun "cabinets" rather than the head noun "key"). Evidence for non-syntactic influences on agreement is mixed in these studies. Recently several researchers have identified constructions in which several grammatical options are available (Haskell & MacDonald, submitted; Hemforth & Konieczny, 2002). These constructions are potentially quite informative, because subtle non-syntactic effects may be more evident here than in cases where only one agreement pattern is grammatical. We investigate another case of this sort, subject-verb number agreement with certain quantifier phrases in Serbian such as "five cows", for which both singular and plural verbs are grammatical. Introduction Number Marking and Number Morphing (Bock et al., 2001) Message Formulation Grammatical Encoding NP In the case of attraction errors, the blocking mechanism failed. VP are NP1 PP Det N P the key to NP2 Det the N Quantifier + Noun: noun case depends on the quantifier masculine: 1 konj-NOM.SG. 1 horse trči-SG. runs 2, 3, 4 krave-NOM.PL. 2, 3, 4 cows 2, 3, 4 konja-DUAL 2, 3, 4 horses trče-PL. run 5, 6, ... krava-GEN.PL. 5, 6, ... cows 5, 6, ... konja-GEN.PL. 5, 6, ... horses trče-PL./trči-SG. run/runs cabinets krava-GEN.PL.=NOM.SG. Hierarchical Feature Passing (Vigliocco & Nicol, 1998) number: (3) The little girl-SG. is-SG. beautiful. gender: (4) La-FEM. niña-FEM. pequeña-FEM. es linda-FEM. person: (5) She-3rd.P.SG. sings-3rd.P.SG. (6) Gledam malu-ACC. devojčicu-ACC. I’m watching the little girl. The result of processing is determined by the interaction of multiple graded, probabilistic constraints (MacDonald et al., 1994; Trueswell & Tanenhaus, 1994; Haskell & MacDonald, in press; Thornton & MacDonald, in press) syntax semantics The focus of this study is subject-verb number agreement production (for example, (1)). singular plural morphology How to Study Subject-Verb Agreement Production? the key to the cabinets • • the key to the cabinets is on the shelf • the key to the cabinets-PL. are-PL. on the shelf head noun local noun the subjects erroneously produce the verb that agrees in number with the local noun, instead of the head noun Experiment 1: Two Forms Grammatical pragmatics singular plural morphology 5, 6, ... krava-GEN.PL=NOM.SG 5, 6, ... konja-GEN.PL. trče-PL/trči-SG 5, 6, ... horses 5, 6, ... cows run/runs - 40 Ss, native speakers of Serbian - fragment completion task, with preambles with feminine or masculine nouns (e.g. five cows) Error-free Subject-Verb Agreement and is supposed to repeat it and complete the sentence, e.g. Sometimes the subjects produce attraction errors: semantics Competition produces variability in responses! Fragment completion task: The subject is presented with a sentence preamble like If case homophony and distributional information influence agreement production, then the proportion of singular verbs with feminine nouns should be higher than with masculine nouns. syntax pragmatics • Most of the studies of subject-verb agreement production were focused on errors! Recently, however, several constructions where more than one option is grammatically correct have been studied (Haskell & MacDonald, 2002; Hemforth & Konieczny, 2002): subtle non-syntactic effects may be more evident here than in constructions where only one agreement pattern is grammatical. In Serbian (and possibly other Slavic languages) there is a construction where both singular and plural verb forms are allowed: Quantifier + NP: 5 krava-GEN.PL. trče-PL./trči-SG. 5 cows run/runs Experiment 1 investigates the role of morphophonological factors in agreement production in this case. Both singular and plural verbs are grammatical! Genitive plural form of feminine nouns is homophonous with nominative singular form. Nominative form is the agreement controller in subjectverb agreement. 100 Percentage of Responses Across different languages, it includes properties such as: Theories II: Agreement Production as a Constraint Satisfaction Process singular verb plural verb misc. 80 60 40 20 Results: • significantly more singular verb responses in preambles with feminine nouns • miscellaneous responses are equally distributed across genders (i.e. the effect is not coming from comprehension difficulties) 0 Feminine Experiment 2: One Form Grammatical Verb: feminine: 1 krava-NOM.SG. 1 cow (1) The bird-SG. sings-SG. (2) The birds-PL. sing-PL. case: S Phonological Encoding Agreement is a systematic covariation of the properties of linguistic elements which indicates a relationship between them. e.g. = Number marking Number morphing Quantifiers in Serbian Masculine Normal, error-free agreement production is influenced by distributional morpho-phonological factors: homophony with nominative singular form in feminine nouns promotes the use of singular verbs. 2, 3, 4 krave-NOM.PL. 2, 3, 4 cows 2, 3, 4 konja-DUAL 2, 3, 4 horses trče-PL. run Only plural form is grammatical! konja-DUAL .=GEN.SG. In masculine nouns, the archaic dual form is homophonous with genitive singular form. Even though genitive form is not the agreement controller in subject-verb agreement, it serves that function in adjectivenoun number agreement. If case homophony and distributional information influence agreement production then the number of singular verb forms (agreement errors) in masculine nouns should be higher than in feminine nouns. - 40 Ss, native speakers of Serbian - same methodology as for Exp. 1 (fragment completion task: three cows) singular verb plural verb misc. 100 Percentage of Responses Abstract 80 60 40 20 0 Feminine Results: • significantly more singular verb responses in preambles with masculine nouns • more plural verb responses in preambles with feminine nouns (p=0.088) • equal distribution of miscellaneous responses in two genders Masculine Agreement production is influenced by distributional morphophonological factors, which is in this case indicated by the increase of agreement errors in masculine nouns. Conclusions • Subject-verb agreement production can be influenced by morphophonological distributional information, when both one and more than one grammatical alternatives exist. • Together with other results showing semantic (Thornton & MacDonald, in press; Vigliocco et al., 1996) and phonological (Haskell & MacDonald, in press; Hartsuiker et al, submitted) effects, our studies show that agreement production is well described in terms of a constraint satisfaction process. Please see handout for references. Thanks to: Laboratory for Experimental Psychology, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia & Montenegro This work is supported by NIH Grant P50 MH 64445 and the Vilas Trust, UW-Madison.