Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Epitaxial Silicon Detectors for Particle Tracking Overview on Radiation Tolerance at Extreme Hadron Fluence G. Lindström(a), E. Fretwurst(a), F. Hönniger(a), G. Kramberger(b), M. Moll(c), E. Nossarzewska(d), I. Pintilie(e), R. Röder(e) (a) Institute for Experimental Physics, University of Hamburg (b) Jozef Stefan Institute, University of Ljubljana (c) CERN (d) ITME Institute of Electronic Materials Technology, Warsaw (e) National Institute for Materials Physics, Bucharest (f) CiS Institut für Mikrosensorik gGmbH, Erfurt Joint Project: Bucharest-Hamburg-Ljubljana with ITME (EPI), CiS (diodes), CERN (PS-p) Motivation Material parameters Results for proton and neutron irradiated devices S-LHC scenario: simulation and experimental data Summary 1 G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 Motivation LHC upgrade to Super-LHC Luminostity LHC: L ~ 1034 cm-2s-1 S-LHC: L ~ 1035 cm-2s-1 Expected radiation at inner pixel layer (4 cm) under S-LHC conditions: Fluence for fast hadrons: 1.61016 cm-2 Dose: 420 Mrad Proposed Solution: thin EPI-SI for small size pixels Si best candidate: low cost, large availability, proven technology thickness doesn’t matter! CCE limited at 1016 cm-2 by e 20 m, h 10 m small pixel size needed, allows thin devices with acceptable capacitance for S/N high Neff,0 (low ρ) provides large donor reservoir, delays type inversion Needed data for prediction of S-LHC operational scenario: Reliable projection of damage data to S-LHC operation Full annealing cycles at elevated temperatures Charge collection efficiency at very high fluences 2 G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 Material Parameters 75 mu 50 mu 25 mu 102 18 10 5 SIMS 25 m SIMS 50 m SIMS 75 m simulation 25 m simulation 50 m simulation 75m 1017 5 16 10 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Depth [m] Oxygen depth profiles SIMS-measurements after diode processing O diffusion from substrate into epi-layer Resistivity [ cm] O-concentration [1/cm3] 5 101 100 -1 10 25 m, C-V method 50 m, C-V method 50 m, spreading resistance 75 mum, C-V method 10-2 0 20 40 60 Depth [m] 80 Resistivity profiles SR before diode process, C-V on diodes interstial Oi + dimers O2i SR coincides well with C-V method [O] 25 µm > [O] 50 µm Excellent homogeneity in epi-layers process simulation yields reliable [O] (SIMS-measurements: A. Barcz/ITME, Simulations: L. Long/CiS) 3 100 (SR-measurements: E. Nossarzewska, ITME) G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 Typical Annealing Curves 140 1000 23 GeV protons 120 23 GeV protons Ta=80oC o Vfd [V] 80 50 m EPI, 9.7.1014 cm-2 60 50 m FZ, 1.1.1015 cm-2 Vfd [V] Ta=80 C 100 100 40 9.1015 cm-2 6.1015 cm-2 2.1015 cm-2 20 1.1015 cm-2 3.1014 cm-2 0 0 10 10 101 102 103 Annealing time [min] 104 105 100 101 102 103 Annealing time [min] 104 105 Comparison EPI- with FZ-device: Typical annealing behavior of EPI-devices: Vfd development: Vfd development: short term: EPI increasing, FZ decreasing long term: EPI decreasing, FZ increasing Inversion only(!) during annealing () EPI not inverted, FZ inverted, already EPI never inverted at RT (t < 500d), even for 1016 immediately after irradiation 4 (100 min @ 80C ≈ 500 days @ RT) G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 Parameterization of Annealing Results Change of effective “doping“ concentration: Neff = Neff,0 – Neff (,t(T)) Standard parameterization: Neff = NA(,t(T)) + NC() + NY(,t(T)) Annealing components: 5.0.1013 Neff [ cm-3] Short term annealing NA(,t(T)) Ta=80oC 4.0.1013 Stable damage NC() 3.0.1013 NC = NC0(1-exp(-cΦeq) + gCΦeq gC negative for EPI (effective positive space charge generation!) NY,2 2.0.1013 NA . NY,1 13 1.0 10 Long term (reverse) annealing: NC 0.0 0 10 5 1 10 2 3 10 10 Annealing time [min] 4 10 5 10 Two components: NY,1(,t(T)), first order process NY,2(,t(T)), second order process NY1, NY2 ~ Φeq, NY1+NY2 similar to FZ G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 Stable Damage Component 25 m, 80 C 50 m, 80oC 2.0.1014 400 50 m, 60oC 300 1.0.1014 200 100 0.0 0 2.1015 4.1015 6.1015 eq [cm-2] 8.1015 1016 0 150 100 5.1013 50 m 25 m 0 0 2.1015 4.1015 6.1015 8.1015 eq [cm-2] 1016 Neff(t0): Value taken at annealing time t0 at which Vfd maximum No space charge sign inversion after proton and neutron irradiation Introduction of shallow donors overcompensates creation of acceptors Protons: Stronger increase for 25 µm compared to 50 µm higher [O] and possibly [O2] in 25 µm (see SIMS profiles) Neutrons: Similar effect but not nearly as pronounced most probably due to less generation of shallow donors and as strong influence of acceptors 6 50 G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 0 Vfd (t0)[V] normalized to 50 m Neff(t0) [cm-3] 500 o Reactor neutrons Ta = 80oC Neff (t0) [cm-3] 600 23 GeV protons 3.0.1014 Vfd(t0) [V] normalized to 50 m 1014 Shallow Donors, the real issue for EPI -Comparison of 25, 50 and 75 µm Diodes- SIMS 25 m SIMS 50 m SIMS 75 m simulation 25 m simulation 50 m simulation 75m 1017 5 1016 5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Depth [m] SIMS profiling: [O](25µm) > [O](50µm) > [O](75µm) Stable Damage: Neff(25µm) > Neff(50µm) > Neff(75µm) TSC Defect Spectroscopy: [BD](25µm) > [BD](50µm) > [BD](75µm) 2.1014 Neff(t0) [cm-3] 1018 5 23 GeV protons Stable Damage after PS p-irradiation 25 m, 80 oC 50 m, 80 oC 75 m, 80 oC Generation of positive space charge most pronounced in 25 µm diodes 1014 0 0 TSC (pA/ signal(pA/ NormalisedNormalised m) m) TSC signal 75 mu 50 mu SIMS profiling of [O] 25 mu O-concentration [1/cm3] 5 2.1015 4.1015 6.1015 -2 75 m eq [cm ] 0.4 50 m 25 m 1.2 8.1015 1016 CiOi -/0 V2 CiOi +? 0/++ BD 1.0 -/0 V2 +? 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.4 80 100 0/++ BD 0.2 120 140 160 75 m Temperature (K) 50 m 25 m 0.0 80 100 120 140 Temperature (K) 160 Defect spectroscopy after PS p-irradiation Generation of recently found shallow donors BD (Ec-0.23 eV) 180strongly related to [O] Possibly caused by O-dimers, outdiffused from Cz with larger 180 diffusion constant dimers monitored by IO2 complex Strong correlation between [O]-[BD]-gC generation of O (dimer?)-related BD reason for superior radiation tolerance of EPI Si detectors 7 G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 Annealing Curves for 25 µm and 50 µm 4.0.1014 . 23 GeV protons Ta=80oC 14 Neff [cm-3] 3.0 10 2.0.1014 1.0.1014 50 m 25 m 0.0 -1.0.1014 -2.0.1014 0 10 101 102 103 Annealing time [min] 104 105 Nearly identical time dependence, constant difference between both curves Shift due to higher introduction of shallow donors in 25 µm epi-Si Concentration of donors not affected by long term annealing Radiation induced donors are stable at 80°C (verified by TSC) 8 G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 Examples of parameter evaluation from annealing: Fluence Dependence of NY1 23 GeV protons . 2.0.1014 25 m, 80oC 1.0.1014 0.0 0 2.1015 4.1015 6.1015 eq [cm-2] Reactor neutrons Ta = 80oC 1.0.1014 50 m, 80oC 25 m 50 m, 60oC 50m 8.1015 1016 Introduction rate for protons: Independent of epi-layer thickness and annealing temperature gY1 = 3.110-2 cm-1 9 14 2.0 10 NY1 [cm-3] NY1 [cm-3] 3.0.1014 0.0 0 2.1015 4.1015 6.1015 eq [cm-2] 8.1015 1016 Introduction rate for neutrons: Value for 25 µm slightly lower compared to 50 µm, average value: gY1 = 1.710-2 cm-1 G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 Reverse Annealing Time Constants 104 105 23 GeV protons Reactor neutrons Ta = 80oC o 60 C 104 10 80oC 102 101 0 2.1015 106 4.1015 6.1015 eq [cm-2] 8.1015 1016 104 60oC 80oC 50 m, 60oC 50 m, 80oC 25 m, 80oC 103 1014 25 m 25 m 50 m 50 m 2.1015 4.1015 6.1015 eq [cm-2] 8.1015 1016 Protons: 5 10 0 Y,2 Y,1 101 23 GeV protons Y,2 [min] 103 102 50 m 50 m 25 m 10 Y [min] Y,1 [min] 3 above 1015 cm-2 Y1 and Y2 constant Ratio Y1(60°C)/ Y1(80°C) = 11 Ratio Y2(60°C)/ Y2(80°C) = 10 below 1015 cm-2 Y2 1/eq Neutrons: above 21015 cm-2 Y1 and Y2 constant 1015 eq [cm-2] 1016 Y1(50 µm) = 1.3102 min, Y1(25 µm) = 3.3102 min Y2(50 µm) = 2.9103 min, Y2(25 µm) = 5.3103 min G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 Temperature Dependence of Y1 and Y2 23 GeV protons 100 oC 80 oC 106 5 60 oC 40 oC 20 oC Ea = 1.3 eV Y [min] 10 104 103 Y : FZ-Si 2 10 Y1: EPI-Si Y2: EPI-Si 101 100 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 -3 -1 1/T [10 K ] Arrhenius relation: 1/ Y = k0exp(-Ea/kBT) 3.4 High resistivity FZ Si: M. Moll, PhD thesis Y1 component: Ea = 1.3 eV, k0 = 1.5 1015 s-1 Y2 component: Ea = 1.3 eV, k0 = 5.4 1013 s-1 11 G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 Reliability check: Annealing at 20°C Example: EPI 50 µm, Φp = 1.01·1016 cm-2 300 250 parameter 20°C data fit 80°C data fit -8.9·1013 cm-3 -8.6 ·1013 cm-3 150 Stable dam. NC 3 ·1013 cm-3 5 ·1013 cm-3 100 Benef. Ann. Na Rev. Ann. NY1 2.2 ·1014 cm-3 1.8 ·1014 cm-3 experimental data fit: Hamburg model VFD [V] 200 50 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 annealing time at 20oC [days] 20°C annealing results can be fitted with Hamburg model RT Analysis agrees reasonably well with results from 60°, 80°C Projection from high T annealing to behavior at RT reliable 12 G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 Charge collection efficiency Charge Collection Efficiency 23 GeV protons 1.0 25 m, 80oC 0.9 50 m, 80oC 50 m, 60oC CCE degradation linear with fluence if the devices are fully depleted CCE = 1 – , = 2.710-17 cm2 0.8 0.7 0.6 0 Charge collection efficiency measured with 244Cm -particles (5.8 MeV, R30 µm) Integration time window 20 ns CCE(1016 cm-2) = 70 % 2.1015 4.1015 6.1015 eq [cm-2] 8.1015 1016 Charge collection efficiency measured with 90Sr electrons(mip’s), shaping time 25 ns CCE no degradation at low temperatures ! degradation linear with fluence if the devices CCE measured after n- and p-irradiation CCE(Φp=1016 cm-2) = 2400 e (mp-value) Extracted trapping parameters coincide with those measured in FZ diodes for small Φ, for large Φ less trapping than expected ! 13 G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 Current Generation 0.5 Ta = 80oC ta = 8 min I/V [Acm-3] 0.4 0.3 50 m 25 m 0.2 I = x eq x Vol 0.1 0.0 0 2.1015 4.1015 6.1015 eq [cm-2] 8.1015 1016 Result almost identical to FZ silicon: Current related damage rate α = 4.1·10-17 Acm-1 (Small deviations in short term annealing) 14 G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 S-LHC CERN scenario experiment Proposal: Storage of EPIdetectors during beam off periods at RT (in contrast to required cold storage for FZ) 250 50 m after 50 min@80C annealing 200 Vfd [V] Stable donor generation at high Φ would lead to larger Vfd, but acceptor generation during RT anneal could compensate this. 150 50 m simulation 100 Check by dedicated experiment: Experimental parameter: Irradiation: fluence steps 2.21015 cm-2 irradiation temperature 25°C After each irradiation step annealing at 80°C for 50 min, corresponding 265 days at 20°C 15 25 m after 50 min@80C annealing 50 0 0 25 m simulation 2.1015 4.1015 6.1015 8.1015 eq [cm-2] 1016 Simulation: reproducing the experimental scenario with damage parameters from analysis Excellent agreement between experimental data and simulated results Simulation + parameters reliable! G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 S-LHC operational scenario simulation results 600 Vfd [V] S-LHC scenario 500 50 m cold 50 m warm 400 25 m cold S-LHC: L=1035cm-2s-1 Most inner pixel layer operational period per year: 100 d, -7°C, Φ = 3.48·1015cm-2 25 m warm 300 200 beam off period per year 265 d, +20°C (lower curves) -7°C (upper curves) 100 0 0 365 730 1095 time [days] 1460 1825 RT storage during beam off periods extremely beneficial Damage during operation at -7°C compensated by 100 d RT annealing Effect more pronounced for 50 µm: less donor creation, same acceptor component Depletion voltage for full SLHC period less than 300 V 16 G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005 Summary Thin low resistivity EPI diodes (grown on Cz) are extremely radiation tolerant No type inversion observed up to Φeq = 1016 cm-2 for protons and neutrons, space charge sign remains positive even during long time annealing Annealing experiments at elevated temperatures reveal stable donor generation (in contrast to FZ), overcompensating the damage induced acceptor concentration Elevated temperature annealing results verified at 20°C Dedicated CERN scenario experiment shows benefits of RT storage in contrast to required cooling for FZ silicon, experimental results in excellent agreement with simulations using the Hamburg model parameters Simulation of real SLHC operational scenario with RT annealing during beam off periods show that Vfd kept at <300V (50μm), <150V (25μm) for full 5 y SLHC Donors identified: BD point defects (EC-0.23 eV) most likely related to O-dimers strong correlation found between [O](SIMS)-[BD](TSC)-NC(annealing exp.) Trapping almost as expected from FZ, 2400 e measured for mips after 1016 cm-2 Current related damage rate 4·10-17 Acm-1 (as known for FZ) 17 G. Lindström, University of Hamburg, 10th European Symposium on Semiconductor Detectors, Wildbad Kreuth,12-16 June 2005