Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
ECIV 724 A Dynamics of Structures Instructor: Dr. Dimitris C. Rizos 300 Main St. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering (803) 777-6166 [email protected] Earth Layers The Main Earth Layers are: • Core • Lower Mantle • Upper Mantle • Crust Earth Layers Theory of Tectonic Plates Theory of Tectonic Plates Fault Types St. Andreas Fault Location: Carrizo Plain area, San Luis Obispo County, California. Surface Rupture Right-Lateral Strike-Slip Faults Photo credit: R.E. Wallace, U.S. Geological Survey. El Progresso, Guatemala February 4, 1976 Plastic Deformation Saturated unconsolidated deposits left-lateral strike-slip fault Dickey, Idaho horizontal offset ~2 m Fault scarp Earthquake of February 4, 1976, Guatemala offset 2.6 m San Francisco, April 18, 1906 Guatemala February 4, 1976 Wave Types Wave Types Ground Motion External excitation in the form of • Ground Displacements • Ground Velocities • Ground Accelerations Typical Duration 20-100 sec Ground Motion Ground Motion has 3 Components N-S, E-W and Vertical Horizontal components are of major interest (excessive shear forces) Vertical component has been traditionally ignored, but may be important. Intstrumentation Strong Motion Accelerograph A transducer: SDOF highly damped (60-70%) Known k, m (fn ~ 25 Hz) Sampling Rate: 1/100, 1/50 sec (10,000 sampling points) LIQUEFACTION-DIFFERENTIAL SETTLEMENTS Niigata, Japan. June 16, 1964, 7.4 GROUND DEFORMATION-DIFFERENTIAL SETTLING Earthquake of July 29, 1967, Caracas, Venezuela. GROUND SHAKING Before Huaraz, Peru May 31, 1970, 7.8R After San Fernando Mexico City Collapsed Cypress section of Interstate 880 the 1989 Loma Prieta (California) Northridge 1994 Parking garage at California State University Damaged Kobe waterfront (1995) Office Buildings, Kobe 1995 Kobe 1995 Collapsed first and second stories Collapse of Freeway in 1989 Loma Prieta, CA Earthquake (7.1R) Structural Response Assumed to be Independent of Ground Motion True for most cases when Soil-Structure Interaction is not an issue EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS SDF SYSTEMS A SDF system is subjected to a ground motion ug(t). The deformation response u(t) is to be calculated. u(t ) m m (ug u) c u k u 0 c k/2 ug (t ) k/2 u 2 ωn u ωn2 u ug (t ) EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS EQUIVALENT STATIC FORCE fs(t) is the force which must be applied statically in order to create a displacement u(t). fs (t ) k u(t ) m n2 u(t ) u(t ) m A(t ) fs (t ) A(t ) 2 n u(t ) u(t ) Pseudo accelerati on REPONSE SPECTRA A response spectrum is a plot of maximum response (e.g. displacement, velocity, acceleration) of SDF systems to a given ground acceleration versus systems parameters (Tn , ). A response spectrum is calculated numerically using time integration methods for many values of parameters (Tn , ). REPONSE SPECTRA Example : Deformation response spectrum for El Centro earthquake Deformation, pseudo-velocity and pseudoacceleration response spectra can be defined and ploted on the same graphs Peak Deformatio n D max u (t ) Peak Pseudo velocity V n D Peak Pseudo acceleration A n2 D n : natural circular frequency of the SDF system. COMBINED D-V-A SPECTRUM RESPONSE SPECTRUM CHARCTERISTICS Tn 2 m k Tn < 0.03 s : rigid system no deformation u(t) ≈ 0 D ≈ 0 RESPONSE SPECTRUM CHARCTERISTICS Tn 2 m k Tn > 15 s : flexible system no total displacement u(t) = ug(t) D = ugo RESPONSE SPECTRUM CHARCTERISTICS Tn 0.5 s : acceleration sensitive region 0.5 Tn 3 s : velocity sensitive region Tn 3 s : displaceme nt sensitive region Example