Download Aquatic Fungi & Leaf Breakdown

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
Transcript
Katie Seymore
 Two different aquatic fungi
 Leaf breakdown and fungi
 Bacteria and fungi relationship
 The essential role of leaf conditioning
 Aquatic hyphomycetes and aero-aquatic fungi
 Form-class fungi
 Most Ascomycetes, fewer Basidiomycetes, one Oomycete
 Secondarily adapted to aquatic life
 Convergent evolution events
 Similar ecological roles
 Leaf breakdown
 First described by Ingold
in the 1940’s
 Produce and release spores
underwater
 Mostly in streams-
moving, oxygenated water
Conidia
 Described by Beverwijk 1950’s
 Amphibious
 Propagules trap air and float for dispersal
 Mostly in temporary waters, low oxygen
Fall- conidia germinating
Winter/spring- grow
Summer- make propagules
 Trap air
 Hydrophobic
encrustation
 Many different forms
 Important ecological role
 Release nutrients to aquatic ecosystems
 Increase leaf’s N content
 Lowers leaf mass
 Amount of lignin (polymer in cells walls) content
controls how fast leaf decomposes
 available carbon
 Tannins amounts also big deal
(phenol compounds)
 Overall generalists
 Can specialize
 Combined exoenxzymes of all fungi on a leaf help
speed breakdown
 Linked mycelium
 Two different leaves
 Help by Sharing
 Harm by sending incorrect cues to healthy mycelium
 Bacteria are often talked about, but have only
a small role
 Bacteria cannot penetrate leaf, only on outside
 Fungi are 95% of microbial biomass
 Fungi perform better without bacteria
 Bacteria has little growth without the
presence of fungi
 secondary compounds
 Key links in the food web
 Breakdown tough compounds in the leaves
 Different leaves condition at different times
 Make leaves suitable for detritivores, like
caddisflies
 Caddisflies consume leaf parts
 but really, the fungi in the leaf is more nutritious then
the leaf itself
 Caddisflies taste test leaves
 Will avoid unconditioned parts, eat only the best spots
 Leaves can be over conditioned by fungi
 Out of nutrients
 Fungi dead
 Mycotoxins
 Instead of conditioning the leaf, some fungi make it
less palatable
 Defense against getting eaten
 Allochthonous material very important for aquatic food
webs
 Organisms in vernal ponds have limited time to grow
before ponds dry out, so any increase in food quality
helps!
 Fungi play a role in food availability throughout the year
with different conditioning times for different leaves
 Two main forms of aquatic fungi
 Awesome convergent evolution
 Important for food supply in aquatic ecosystems
 Key to nutrient release and detrital breakdown
 http://www.botanik.univie.ac.at/mycology/images/Poster








Oslo.jpg
footage.shutterstock.com
http://ww2.coastal.edu/vgulis/conidia.htm
http://www.mycolog.com/chapter11b.htm
http://www.mycolog.com/chapter11b.htm
www.thinklongislandfirst.com
http://www.naturalheritage.state.pa.us/VernalPool_Ecolog
y.aspx
http://fungi.life.illinois.edu/about/mitosporic_fungi
http://super-marioworld.webnode.com.br/products/random-images-4/

Arsuffi T.L. and K. Suberkropp. 1984. Leaf Processing Capabilities of Aquatic Hyphomycetes:
Oikos, 42(2): 144-154.
Interspecific Differences and Influenceon Shredder Feeding Preferences.
Arsuffi T.L. and K. Suberkropp. 1985. Selective Feeding by Stream Caddisfly (Trichoptera)
Detritivores on Leaves with Fungal-Colonized Patches. Oikos, 45(1): 50-58.
Butler S.K. and K, Suberkropp. 1986. Aquatic Hyphomycetes on Oak Leaves: Comparison of
Growth, Degradation and Palatability. Mycologia, 78(6): 922-928.
Chung, N. and K. Suberkropp. 2009. Contribution of fungal biomass to the growth of the
Biology, 54: 2212–2224.
shredder, Pycnopsyche gentilis (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae). Freshwater
Cohen, J. S., S. Ng and N. Blossey. 2012. Quantity Counts: Amount of Litter Determines
46(1): 85–90.
Tadpole Performance in Experimental Microcosms. Journal of Herpetology
Duarte, S., C. Pascoal, F. Cássio and F. Bärlocher. 2006. Aquatic Hyphomycete Diversity and
658-666.
Identity Affect Leaf Litter Decomposition in Microcosms. Oecologia, 147(4):
Gessner M.O. and E. Chauvet.1994. Ecology Importance of Stream Microfungi in Controlling
Breakdown Rates of Leaf Litter., 75(6):1807-1817.
Golladay, S. W., J. R. Webster and E. F. Benfield. 1983. Factors Affecting Food Utilization by a
Ecology
6(2): 157-162
Leaf Shredding Aquatic Insect: Leaf Species and Conditioning Time. Holarctic
Gulis V. and K. Suberkropp. 2003. Effect of Inorganic Nutrients on Relative Contributions of
Microbial
Ecology, 45(1): 11-19.
Fungi and Bacteria to Carbon Flow from Submerged Decomposing Leaf Litter.


















Hutchens, J. J., E.F. Benfield and J. R. Webster. 1997. Diet and Growth of a Leaf-shredding
Contrasting Disturbance History. Hydrobiologia 346: 193–201.
Caddisfly in Southern Appalachian Streams of

Inkley, M.D., S.A. Wissinger, and B.L. Baros. 2008. Effects of drying regime on microbial
Freshwater Biology 53: 435–445.
colonization and shredder preference in seasonal woodland wetlands.
Maerz, J.C., J. S. Cohen and B. Blossey. 2010. Does Detritus Quality Predict the Effect of Native
Biology 55:
1694–1704.
and Nonnative Plants on the Performance of Larval Amphibians? Freshwater




Markovskaja S. 2012. Aero-Aquatic fungi Colonizing Decaying leaves in woodland swampy

Pools of Aukstadvaris Regional Park (Lithuania). Botanica Lithuanica, 18(2): 123–132.




Premdas P. D. and B. Kendrick. 1991. Colonization of Autumn-Shed Leaves by Four AeroAquatic Fungi. Mycologia, 83(3): 317-321.