Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Week 7 Issues in Microeconomics ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 The labour market ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Demand for factors in the long run • The optimum mix of capital and labour depends on the relative prices of these factors – This helps to explain why more labour-intensive means of production are used in some countries where labour is relatively abundant. • A change in the price of one factor will have both output and substitution effects • A rise in the wage rate leads to – substitution towards more capital-intensive techniques – but also leads to lower total output 2 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 The demand for labour in the short run The marginal value product of labour is the revenue obtained by selling the output produced by an extra worker • Under perfect competition, with diminishing marginal productivity: • the firm maximizes profit when the marginal cost of employing an extra worker equals the MVPL... W0 MVPL Employment 3 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 The demand for labour in the short run E W0 MVPL …this occurs at E where wage = MVPL. Employment is L*. Below L*, extra employment adds more to revenue than to labour costs. Above L*, the reverse is so. This decision is consistent with the MR = SMC rule for maximizing profit under perfect competition. L* Employment 4 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 The supply of labour • The LABOUR FORCE: – all individuals in work or seeking employment • Labour supply – for an individual, the decision on how many hours to offer to work depends on the real wage – an individual’s attitude towards leisure and income determines if more or less hours of work are supplied at a higher real wage rate. 5 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Labour supply in aggregate • If we consider the economy as a whole, or an industry • a higher real wage rate also encourages a higher participation rate • so labour supply is likely to be upwardsloping 6 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Labour market equilibrium for an industry SL DL • The industry supply curve SLSL slopes up – higher wages are needed to attract workers into the industry W0 DL SL • For a given output demand curve, industry demand for labour slopes down • Equilibrium is W0, L0. L0 Quantity of labour 7 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 A shift in product demand SL DL D'L Beginning in equilibrium, a fall in demand for the product also shifts the derived demand for labour to D'L W0 W1 DL SL D'L L 1 L0 The new equilibrium is at W1, L1. Quantity of labour 8 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 A change in wages in another industry S'L SL DL Again starting in equilibrium, An increase in wages in another industry attracts labour, W2 W0 so industry supply shifts to the left – S'L DL SL L2 L0 The new equilibrium is at W2, L2. Quantity of labour 9 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 The information economy ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 11 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Welfare indicators by country group Business use of the internet 2003 Business use of the internet 1997 1500 6 £bn 4 £bn 2 0 1000 500 0 1997 Business to business Business to consumer 2003 Business to business Business to consumer 12 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 e-products • An e-product: – can be digitally encoded then transmitted rapidly, accurately and cheaply e.g. music, films, books, sport … • Fixed costs of producing e-products are huge … • … but marginal costs of distribution are tiny • implying vast economies of scale 13 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Network externalities Suppose D1 represents the demand curve for a product exhibiting network externalities £ D With price at P1, demand is limited. P1 If price is reduced to P2, more people find the network attractive so not only is there a move along the demand curve, but there is a shift in demand. P2 D1 Q1 Q2 D2 D Long-run demand is more elastic (DD). Quantity 14 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Information: the supply side • Given substantial economies of scale, we expect monopoly suppliers of information products: • Dominant firm with competitive fringe e.g. Microsoft • Niche market monopolies 15 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Pricing information products • Strategies for pricing information products: – two-part tariff • an annual charge to cover fixed costs, and a small price per unit related to marginal costs – versioning • the deliberate creation of different qualities to facilitate price discrimination – bundling • the joint supply of more than one product to reduce the need for price discrimination 16 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Competition vs. collaboration • A strategic alliance is a blend of cooperation and competition, in which a group of suppliers provide a range of products that partly complement one another – e.g. Microsoft and Intel – airline alliances: One World, Star 17 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Understanding the eeconomy • 1 The information revolution is changing our lives – but few of its activities or market tactics are unprecedented • 2 The revolution in technology has not required a corresponding revolution in economic theory 18 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Government spending and Revenue ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Government spending The scale of government activity has grown steadily in industrial countries since 1880 % of national income 60 50 Japan USA Germany UK France Sweden 40 30 20 10 0 1880 1929 1960 2001 20 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Private and public goods • A private good – if consumed by one person, cannot be consumed by another person. e.g. dental treatment • A public good – even if consumed by one person, can still be consumed by other people. e.g. street lighting The strong externalities associated with public goods, mean that government intervention may be justified to ensure appropriate provision. 21 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Merit goods and bads • Merit goods (bads) – goods (bads) that society thinks everyone ought to have (ought not to have) regardless of whether they are wanted by each individual. e.g. Education, health services, cigarettes – The government may spend money on compulsory education or compulsory vaccination because it recognizes that otherwise individuals act in a way they will subsequently regret. 22 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Varieties of taxes • Direct taxes – taxes on earnings from labour, rents, dividends and interest. e.g. income tax, corporation tax • Indirect taxes – taxes levied on expenditures on goods and services e.g. VAT, duty on alcohol • Wealth taxes – capital transfer tax, tax on property 23 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 A tax on wages With no tax, the labour SS' market is in equilibrium at wage W, hours L. SS With a tax, labour supply is effectively at SS', workers receive W'', but firms pay W', the difference being the tax. W' W W'' DD L' L Hours worked Employers pay the blue area, and workers the green. The orange area is a welfare loss for society. 24 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 The incidence of a tax • Who pays a tax depends upon the elasticity of demand and supply for the product. • This also affects the size of distortion caused by the imposition of a tax. 25 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 The Laffer curve shows how much tax revenue is raised at each possible tax rate. Beyond t*, higher tax rates reduce revenue because of disincentive effects. t* Tax rate 26 100% ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Industrial policy and competition policy ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Industrial policy and Competition Policy • Competition policy – aims to enhance economic efficiency by promoting or safeguarding competition between firms • Industrial policy – aims to offset externalities that affect production decisions by firms 28 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Industrial policy • Inventions and the patent system – designed to provide a sufficient incentive for invention without suppressing competition for ever • Research and Development (R&D) – the social return on risky projects may exceed the private return • Dynamic change – coping with sunset and sunrise industries 29 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Consumer surplus Consider the demand curve D and suppose price is at P with quantity demanded being Q. A P P represents the value placed on the good by the marginal consumer E D Q Quantity so D can be seen to represent marginal social benefit With all consumers paying the same price P for the good, the triangle APE represents consumer surplus – benefit received by consumers in excess of the amount they need to pay. 30 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Producer surplus Producer surplus is the excess of total revenue over total costs P LAC = LMC – as shown by the rectangle. D Q Quantity 31 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 The social cost of monopoly: comparing perfect competition and monopoly For simplicity, suppose as industry with horizontal long-run average and marginal costs. LAC = LMC Pc D Qc Quantity Under perfect competition, long-run equilibrium would be with industry output Qc selling at price Pc. Consumer surplus is the area of the big green triangle. 32 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 The social cost of monopoly: comparing perfect competition and monopoly If taken over by a monopolist, profit maximization is at the lower output Qm and higher price Pm. Consumer surplus is now the smaller green triangle. Pm LAC = LMC Pc MR Qm D Qc Quantity The monopoly receives producer surplus (profit) of the blue rectangle. and the red triangle shows the welfare loss – the social cost of monopoly 33 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Perfect competition and monopoly under differing cost conditions Suppose that monopoly enjoys lower cost conditions than under perfect competition Pm Under perfect competition equilibrium is at Pc, Qc. LRSSpc Pc LAC = LMC Compared with Pm, Qm under monopoly MR D Qm Qc Quantity 34 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Welfare implications • In comparing the two situations, the loss of consumer surplus under monopoly (the red triangle) • must be balanced against the gains from efficiency (the blue rectangle) 35 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002 Counting the cost of monopoly • The size of the social cost of monopoly is difficult to evaluate – in part it depends upon the elasticity of demand – which influences the size of the ‘red triangle’ of welfare loss 36 ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, 2002