* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lecture20(Ch17)
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
What Determines a Country’s Comparative Advantage? • Exogenous factors are the most obvious Climate (long growing season) Natural Resources (petroleum reserves) But there are also endogenous factors: education, skills, capital,... • Implies that comparative advantage can change over time: • electronic goods to pharmaceutical goods to internet software to …. Let’s take a closer look at how capital (K) and labor (L) affect comparative advantage – Definitions: • • • • capital abundant country: has high K/L labor abundant country: has low K/L capital intensive production: uses high K/L labor intensive production: uses low K/L • Capital abundant countries: comparative advantage in capital intensive production • Labor abundant countries: comparative advantage in labor intensive production Factor Price Equalization • Factor prices: – wage rate for labor – rental rate for capital • Factor price equalization: even if factors are not mobile, factor prices will tend to equalize with trade What causes factor price equalization? • suppose U.S. has high K/L • suppose Mexico has low K/L • then opening up trade will shift – U.S. production toward capital intensive goods • thus demand for capital rises in U.S – M. production toward labor intensive goods • thus demand for labor rises in Mexico • U.S. wages fall and Mexican wages rise – that is a move toward factor price equalization – assumes ceteris paribus, productivity would rise Gains from Expanded Markets • Theory combines two features of production – economies of scale (declining ATC over the relevant range of production) – product differentiation: leads to monopolistic competition • Focuses on intraindustry trade (same industry) – comparative advantage focuses on interindustry trade (different industries) 17_03 Getting a sense of the gains from expanded markets United States Germany Production: 1,000 MRI units Cost: $300,000 per unit Production: 1,000 MRI units Cost: $300,000 per unit No Trade Production: 1,000 ultrasound units Cost: $200,000 per unit Production: 1,000 ultrasound units Cost: $200,000 per unit United States Germany U.S. exports 1,000 MRI units to Germany. Production: 2,000 MRI units Cost: $150,000 per unit Germany exports 1,000 ultrasound units to U.S. Production: 2,000 ultrasound units Cost: $150,000 per unit Now let’s develop a model to show the gains from expanded markets • First derive a relationship between – the number of firms, – the size of the market – costs per unit (ATC) • Second, derive a relationship between the number of firms and the price • Third, combine the two relationships 17_04D Smaller Market DOLLARS 35 Larger Market DOLLARS 35 30 30 25 25 20 20 15 15 10 Cost per unit 10 5 5 0 1 of 4 QUANTITY Cost per unit 0 1 of 4 QUANTITY 17_04C Smaller Market DOLLARS 35 Larger Market DOLLARS 35 30 30 25 25 20 20 15 15 10 Cost per unit 10 5 5 0 1 of 4 1 of 3 QUANTITY Cost per unit 0 1 of 4 1 of 3 QUANTITY 17_04B Smaller Market Larger Market DOLLARS 35 DOLLARS 35 30 30 25 25 20 20 15 15 10 Cost per unit 10 5 5 0 1 of 4 1 of 3 1 of 2 QUANTITY Cost per unit 0 1 of 4 1 of 3 1 of 2 QUANTITY 17_04A Smaller Market D OLLARS 35 Larger Market Number Cost of per firms unit ($) 30 25 1 2 3 4 20 15 10 D OLLARS 35 10 20 25 30 Cost per unit 5 Number Cost of per firms unit ($) 30 25 15 1 2 3 4 10 Cost per unit 20 5 15 20 25 5 1 of 1 0 1 of 4 1 of 3 1 of 2 1 of 1 Q UANTITY 0 1 of 4 1 of 3 1 of 2 Q UANTITY Now, summarize the results using a new curve 17_05 Cost per unit with smaller market DOLLARS 50 45 Cost per unit with larger market 40 35 30 Curve shifts down as market gets larger. 25 20 15 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NUMBER OF FIRMS IN THE MARKET Recall results from monopolistic competition model • Product differentiation • Firms face downward sloping demand curve • With more firms in the industry, the demand curve shifts – and gets flatter (a point we did not emphasize earlier), so the price falls – sketch this by hand: Now, summarize the result that more firms lead to a lower price in another new curve 17_06 DOLLARS 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 Price in the market 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NUMBER OF FIRMS IN THE MARKET Put the two new curves in the same diagram; look at the long run equilibrium 17_07 DOLLARS Cost per unit 50 The condition of long-run equilibrium is where price equals cost per unit. 45 40 35 Long-run equilibrium price Cost per unit at each firm increases as more firms enter a market of a fixed size... 30 .... but the price each firm will charge falls with the number of firms. 25 20 15 Price (P) in the market 10 Equilibrium number of firms 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NUMBER OF FIRMS IN THE MARKET Finally, open up the economy; curve shifts showing effect of a larger market 17_08 DOLLARS Cost per unit with smaller market 50 Cost per unit at each firm falls as market size increases. 45 40 35 Cost per unit with larger market Reduction in price 30 25 20 15 Price 10 Increase in number of firms and variety 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NUMBER OF FIRMS IN THE MARKET End of Lecture