Download Incremental PathoLogic

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Propagating Changed Annotation and
Pathway Information
1
SRI International Bioinformatics
Revised Annotation Data
 Revised
annotations may contain
 new genes
 updated gene properties
 updated functional descriptions
 Curators don’t want to rebuild PGDB, don’t want
to lose manual curation work
 Curators may have spent a lot of time pruning out
false positive pathway predictions – don’t want
pathway prediction algorithm to reimport them
 Curators want manual oversight over many kinds
of changes
2
SRI International Bioinformatics
Incremental Pathologic Utility
 Build->Update
Build for Revised Annotation
 reads revised annotation file (in .pf or .gbk format)


One per genetic element (required if creating new genes), OR
One file of updates for whole PGDB
compares w/ existing PGDB
 presents summary of changes, GUI for applying updates
 Curator can:
 Apply a set of changes en masse (e.g. create all new genes)
 Examine each change in a group and decide individually
which to apply
 Save progress and return later
 Generate report of changes to import into spreadsheet

3
SRI International Bioinformatics
Updates Applied in Two Phases
 Phase
1
 Create new genes/monomers
 Apply changes to slot values
 Revise functional assignments
 Phase 2
 Rerun pathway prediction
4
SRI International Bioinformatics
Phase 1 Summary Dialog
5
SRI International Bioinformatics
6
SRI International Bioinformatics
Assign Selected Reactions Dialog
7
SRI International Bioinformatics
Phase 2 Rescoring Pathways
 Rescore
Pathways after desired annotation
changes have been made
 Software remembers which pathways were inferred last time
 If a pathway has since been deleted, the software only
considers it if there is now additional evidence for it
 Summary lists:
 Previously deleted pathways now w/ more evidence
 Previously inferred pathways that should now be pruned
 Newly inferred pathways
 Pathways not in MetaCyc
 For each list, curator can quickly check off
pathways that should be deleted
8
SRI International Bioinformatics
9
SRI International Bioinformatics
10
SRI International Bioinformatics
Incorporating New MetaCyc Data
 New
version of MetaCyc
 Revised pathways, reactions, compounds
 New pathways
 Tools->Propagate MetaCyc Data Updates
 Shows differences in compounds, reactions, pathways
 Curator can update all or selected for each class of
difference
 Does not create or delete pathways
 PathoLogic->Refine->Rescore Pathways
 Rescores Pathways and brings up Phase 2 dialog
 May also want to re-run name matcher first
11
SRI International Bioinformatics
12
SRI International Bioinformatics
13
SRI International Bioinformatics
14
SRI International Bioinformatics
Notes/Caveats
 Some
updates only make sense in conjunction w/
others, e.g. pathway and its reactions.
 If you can’t figure out what’s different, default
action should be to propagate from MetaCyc.
 Don’t intersperse edits from update tool w/ edits
using standard editors.
 Can choose to propagate from other reference
PGDB instead.
15
SRI International Bioinformatics