Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Reducing Invasive Fungal Infections and Reducing Cost Presenter: Lee Hamley Hospital: THE ALFRED – Vic Key problem • In 2007-08 haematologists noted increasing invasive fungal infections (IFI) in acute leukaemia and stem cell transplant patients • This is a difficult problem to measure due to definitional issues related to IFI • At the same time, Pharmacy recorded LARGE increases in the use of antifungal agents, which can be extremely expensive • Alfred Health realised we had a problem! 2 Audit definitions of IFI Proven Fungi in histology, micro from a sterile site or BC (ie need biopsy) Probable Possible Host factors & Clinical/radiology Host factors & Clinical/radiology (eg HRCT – dense lesions +/- halo) (eg HRCT – dense lesions +/- halo) & Micro criteria (ie no micro results) (eg fungi from sputum/BAL) Overall IFI = proven + probable Clinical IFI = proven + probable + possible Ascioglu et al CID 2002;34 p7-13 Pauw et al 2008 CID 2008: 46 p1813 3 Aim of this Innovation • To decrease invasive fungal infections in patients with acute leukaemia or stem cell transplantation from a baseline level of around 15% (proven & probable IFI) to best practice levels reported in the literature. 4 Baseline Ambisome costs at The Alfred Haem & SCT use >80% of The Alfred’s Ambisome Allografts = 20 Allografts = 23 5 Key changes implemented • Changes to clinical practice – see next slide • Changes to the environment and related systems – see next slide • Collaborative project for the introduction of in house drug levels – These were not available in Victoria – Levels either not done or sent interstate – Very slow turn around time for results 6 Key changes to clinical practice Allo-SCT AML ALL Environmental 2007 2008 Itra→posa posa→Vori Itra→posa posa→Vori Itra→posa posa→Vori HEPA filter Ward cleaning Policies 2009 2010 2011 Vori Vori/Posa Vori Vori Posa Azole/Amb Azole/Amb Azole/Amb Vori Renovation 7EAST Audit Audit & feedback Patient selection Modified allo-SCT selection criteria Increased number of patients treated on OP clinical trials for AML 7 Overall Rates IFI all groups 2007-2011 Invasive fungal disease (proven + probable IFD) Clinical invasive fungal disease (proven + probable + possible IFD) 2007 n = 73 2008 n = 89 2009 n = 69 2010 n = 92 2011 n =75 2007 n = 73 2008 n = 89 2009 n=69 2010 n =92 2011 n = 75 Allograft 26% 0% 5% 4% 5% 52% 7% 8% 10% 7% AML 6% 15% 5% 5% 5% 41% 33% 20% 21% 18% ALL 17% 4% 0% 0% 0% 34% 30% 20% 0% 33% OVERALL RATE 15.1% 8% 4% 4% 4% 42% 25% 16% 14% 13% 8 Outcomes • Significant reduction in IFI in the target groups to levels reported in the literature • Large cost savings in high cost antifungal drugs, estimated to be approximately $1million per annum • On site drug monitoring now available 9 Allo-SCT – treatment dose antifungals 2007 n = 23 2008 n = 27 2009 n = 39 2010 n = 48 2011 n = 43 Ambisome 15 (65%) 7 (30%) 7 (18%) 2 (4%) 2 (5%) Voriconazole IV 10 (48%) 6 (22%) 9 (23%) 1 (2%) Voriconazole oral 12 (52%) 5 (18%) 10 (25%) 1 (2%) Caspofungin 8 (35%) 1 (3.7%) 1 (2.5%) 0 Posaconazole Overall on treatment dose antifungals 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 19 (83%) 8 (30%) 12 (31%) 5 (10%) 3 (7%) 10 14 Number of patients/cases 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2007 2008 2009 patients in ward 2010 fungal infections 2011 11 Figure 2: cost of treatment dose antifungals for high risk patients $2,500,000 $2,173,305 Antifungal costs $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,064,302 $1,000,000 $801,668 $500,000 $195,056 $2007 2008 2009 2010 12 Figure 3: total (treatment and prophylaxis) costs of antifungals for high risk patients $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $Ambisome Voriconazole IV Voriconazole oral caspofungin 13 Lessons learned • Fungal infections have significant consequences, both clinical and economic • Measurement is critical – if you don’t measure you don’t know! • For complex problems, solutions often cross Departments e.g. Haematology, Pharmacy, Ward, Engineering, Pathology etc • Executive support is essential to facilitate this. • Big gains can be made where you may least expect them, both in terms of patient safety and financial 14