Download Aalborg Universitet Monetary Policy in an Agent-Based Monetary Production Economy Bruun, Charlotte

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Currency intervention wikipedia , lookup

Stock trader wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative easing wikipedia , lookup

Interbank lending market wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Aalborg Universitet
Monetary Policy in an Agent-Based Monetary Production Economy
Bruun, Charlotte
Publication date:
2007
Document Version
Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record
Link to publication from Aalborg University
Citation for published version (APA):
Bruun, C. (2007). Monetary Policy in an Agent-Based Monetary Production Economy. Paper presented at
Society for Computational Economics, 13th international conference on Computing in Economics and Finance.,
Montreal, Canada.
General rights
Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners
and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.
? Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.
? You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain
? You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ?
Take down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to
the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Downloaded from vbn.aau.dk on: September 17, 2016
Monetary Policy in an Agent-Based Monetary
Production Economy
Charlotte Bruun1
Aalborg University, Denmark
[email protected]
1 Introduction
Monetary policy has developed into a question of defining optimal rules. Often such
rules are developed and evaluated in a general equilibrium setting - with or without New Keynesian imperfections (eg. Woodford 2003). However, the question of
making room for money in a general equilibrium setting remains unsolved. Other
New Keynesian have adopted a credit approach to the question of monetary economics (eg. Stiglitz and Greenwald 2003), but again, without leaving the general
equilibrium setting1 . Conducting monetary policy, however, cannot await the answer
to such fundamental questions. Further more the question of monetary policy is very
hard to settle from an empirical point of view. An alternative procedure is to develop
an agent based world as an alternative to the real world.
The question to be posed here concerns an evaluation of proposed policy rules
based on a completely different model than the one in which the policy rules were
defined. If the economy in which we happen to live is better described as a monetary
production system rather than a general equilibrium system, will the policy prescription still work? Possible transmission mechanisms for monetary policy are evaluated,
ie. interest rate effects on investment, private consumption and the stock market.
2 An Agent-Based Monetary Production Economy
A Monetary production economy is an economy where money is not primarily a
means of exchange, but a factor of production. Money does not enter the scene once
production has taken place and needs to be distributed between members of society
- it is a prerequisite for production. As Keynes stated in his Tilton papers(?), in a
monetary production economy, workers are not satisfied with a part of the product
as reward for their labour - they demand a monetary wage, and they demand this
1
See Rochon(1999) for a comparison between New Keynesian and Post Keynesian economics.
2
Charlotte Bruun
wage before the product can be sold. Thus entrepreneurs need money before they can
start up production, and the exchange process on which general eqilibrium places its
focus, is primarily a question for entrepreneurs of getting back the money paid out
as wages.
The agent-based monetary production model follows the monetary circuit described above. A number of producers of consumption goods and investment goods,
lend money in order to hire labour and produce. In this agent-based version the market for consumption goods is decentralized by letting consumer products be distributed to a cellular space on which consumers are situated. The market for investment goods is a list of investment projects from which producers pick.
A vital aspect of a monetary production economy is financial markets. Financial
markets are not a means for transferring purchasing power from savers to investors
since investors may obtain creditmoney without a preceeding act of saving. Financial
markets may be perceived as a means of constantly re-evaluating the production
capital, and a means for entrepreneurs as a group of getting back the money paid out
as wages that have not been spent on the purchase of consumption goods.
All agents, workers and producers, acts on financial agents. In the model agents
have to choose between holding short term credit or holding stock. Only producers
may issue new stock, but all agents hold stock. The financial market is a list of offers
to buy and sell.
s
e -consumptionl
e
c - I-productiont
a
c -C productiont
i
oFinance n
6
check - check - calculate - look for neigbours consumption
goods
finances
transfer
money
deliver - select projects
goods
transfer
money
calculate profit
hire labour
calculate - current production
profit
employ - check sales list
labour
place
goods
bear/bull position
check options
option price
place
options
desired volume
END OF PERIOD - statistical collection and policy corrections
Fig. 1. Main decision procedures of the model
2.1 Production
The primary concern of producers is to obtain a monetary profit2 . The profit of a
producing unit is calculated as the change in financial position of the unit during one
2
This is not at all self evident - as noted by McCauley(2004) But one of Karl Marx’s positive contributions was to remind us that the neo-classical model ignores the profit motive
completely
Monetary Policy in an Agent-Based Monetary Production Economy
3
period. The capital goods as well as the financial assets held by the unit is evaluated at
current prices as determined on the stock market. Following a profit may be obtained
in the production sphere as well as in the financial sphere.
Last periods profits influence the production decision; a positive profit encourages the producer to increase production whereas a negative profit will have a negative impact on the level of production.
2.2 Consumption
Two main factors enter the decision to consume; the average consumption of the
neighbours of the consuming unit and the financial position of the consuming unit.
The neighbour concern enters the consumption decision in order to allow consumption a life of its own - it is not just a passive response to current income as in the
simple Keynesian aggregate consumption function, or to expected future incomes
as in New classical consumption functions. The dynamics of keeping up with the
Jones’s is, together with the producers strive for a monetary profit, recognized as the
fundamental drive of capitalist production.
2.3 Financial Market
All agents, consumers as well as producers, buy and sell financial assets. All agents
have a banking account with an overdraft facility. They may move in and out of
the shortterm credit contract by buying and selling stock, Only producers can issue
stock.
The stock market functions by a simple price adjustment mechanism. Besides
buying and selling at prevailing prices, agent may place options to buy and sell. An
overweight of buy options will cause prices to raise whereas an overweight of sell
options will cause prices to fall.
At the stock market, stock issued by different producers are treated as homogenous - agents cannot tell one asset from another. But if a producer is declared
bankrupt, only the agents holding his particular stock will loose.
2.4 The Transmission Mechanism
The potential transmission mechanism for monetary policy in the original model are
not very strong. Interest rates do not enter directly into the decision procedures of
consuming or investing agents. The dominant determinant of investment is current
stock prices - to be regarded as an estimate of prospective yields. The dominant determinants of consumption/saving is current wealth and consumption by neigbouring
consumers.
However, there is an indirect transmission mechansim through the financial market. The prospective yield of holding a stock is evaluated against interest on bank
deposits. Changes in interest rates are thus likely to have an impact on stock prices,
and following on production, investment and consumption decisions.
4
Charlotte Bruun
There is also a redistributive effect of changes in the rate of interest between
creditors and debitors.
The price level is constant in the model....
3 Policy Experiments
3.1 Means of Monetary Policy
As in the real world, monetary authorities have no means of directly controlling the
volume of money. They may, however, set the rate of interest. In setting the rate of
interest they may use information on the rate of change of the volume of money, or
the level of activity in the model.
3.2 The Money Stock as Policy Target
Following monetarist prescriptions, monetary authorities may attempt to control the
volume of money by increasing interest rates when the volume of money is growing
rapidly. In the simulation, interest rates are increased by 1% when a 10% increase in
the volume of money is observed, and further increases if the growth in money stock
is even more dramatic (se fig.2d). This approach is, however, not very successful in
stabilizing the economy. The level of production does experience larger booms, but
also more severe crashes (fig. 2.a), and the volume of money increases rather than
decreases (fig. 2.c). Since the average rate of interest i smaller than in the base run
without policy, this cannot be due to the general redistributive effect of increases in
interest rates between debitors and creditors. But the timing of increases in interest
rates may be vital; if an increase in the volume of money is due to the fact, that
differences between creditors and debitors is increasing, raising the rate of interest
will only make matters worse and increase benkrutcies.
3.3 Stock Prices as Target for Monetary Policy
It may be better for monetary authorities to target stock prices. Booming stock prices
will have a positive impact on the level of production, investment and through a
wealth effect also consumption. If it is possible to stabilize stock prices it may be
possible to stabilize the economy. This can be done by means of changing the interest rate since holding interest bearing money is an alternative to purchasing stock.
However, as depicted in figure 3, this policy is not more successful.
3.4 Comments on the Simulations
The simulations presented here are very root first approximations of the effects of
monetary policy. Results may depend on the strength of the policy measures, the
length of the historical period that monetary authorities take into consideration, etc.
Thus refinement of the simulations and further verification is called fore. These first
results, however, do indicate, that policy recommendations may be quite different
coming from an agent-based monetary production model.
Monetary Policy in an Agent-Based Monetary Production Economy
Production
5
Stock Prices
110000
125
no policy
with policy
no policy
with policy
100000
120
90000
115
80000
70000
110
60000
105
50000
100
40000
95
30000
20000
500
550
600
650
700
750
90
500
550
600
Volume of Money
650
700
750
Interest Rate
65000
no policy
with policy
no policy
with policy
1.04
60000
55000
1.02
50000
45000
1
40000
35000
0.98
30000
25000
20000
500
0.96
550
600
650
700
750
500
550
600
650
700
750
Fig. 2. Effect of monetary policy targeting the volume of money on (a) production, (b)stock
prices, (c) volume of money and (d)the resulting rate of interest
Production
Stock Prices
100000
120
no policy
with policy
no policy
with policy
90000
115
80000
110
70000
105
60000
100
50000
95
40000
90
30000
20000
500
550
600
650
700
750
85
500
550
600
Volume of Money
650
700
750
Interest Rate
65000
1.05
no policy
with policy
no policy
with policy
60000
1.04
55000
1.03
50000
45000
1.02
40000
1.01
35000
1
30000
0.99
25000
20000
500
550
600
650
700
750
0.98
500
550
600
650
700
750
Fig. 3. Effect of monetary policy targetting stock prices on (a) production, (b) stock prices, (c)
volume of money and (d)the resulting rate of interest
6
Charlotte Bruun
3.5 Conclusion and further work
The agent-based monetary production model may be extended in order to evaluate
some of the policy recommendations based on New Keynesian Theory.
References
1. Keynes, J.M. (1931), Monetary Production.
2. McCauley, J.L. Dynamics of Markets - Econophysics and Finance. Cambridge University
Press 2004.
3. Rochon, Louis-Philippe, Credit, Money and Production - An alternative Post-Keynesian
approach. Edward Elgar 1999.
4. Stiglitz, J. and B. Greenwald. Towards a nem paradigm in monetary economics. Cambridge university press 2003.
5. Woodford, M. Interest and Prices - foundations of a theory of monetary policy. Princeton
University Press 2003.