Download Brain Drain in Argentina

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Brain Drain in Argentina
Tuesday, May 23, 2017
Larry Or
Dan Bryce
Risto.Karinen
Dan LoVullo
Outline
•
•
•
•
Overview
Context
Analysis
Recommendations
Overview
• Definition:
– General: movement of highly trained personnel from one area to another
– Specific: The emigration of highly educated workers from developing
countries to developed countries / from poor countries to rich countries
• Causes
–
–
–
–
–
–
Inadequate salaries
Unstable government and insecurity
High inflation and falling currencies
Lack of human rights
Corruption and lack of accountability
Limited educational opportunities
(World Economic Forum, 2000)
Scope
– Africa looses 70,000 scholars yearly1
– 60% of medical doctors trained in Ghana during the 80s
have left2
– 4,316 skilled South Africans left in 20033
– India looses 100,000 professionals to the United States
yearly, at an estimated annual cost of $2 billion4
– 6,000 left Argentina annually between 1995-2000, plus
250,000 more since then5
1Prof.
Edward Ofori-Sarpong, Ghana
2Mutume, 2003
3Naidu, 2003
4UN Human Development Report, 2001
5Intl Herald Tribune
“Having lost its money, Argentina is now
losing its minds.” (Nevaer, 2002)
• 2002 Economic Collapse
– “… in the first two months of this year [2002], 1,260
Argentine Jews moved to Israel …compared with 2001,
when 1,300 Argentine Jews emigrated to Israel over the
entire year
– “Argentines with a[n] … immediate family member
living in Spain or Italy can obtain visas to emigrate
there”
– “Recently, Argentina issued a desperate plea to the
World Bank for an extension on $800 million loan”
Argentina: 19th century: “glorious century” →
20th century: “lost century” → 21st century: “?”
• GDP: purchasing power parity: $403.8 billion (2002 est.),
• Real growth rate: -10.9% (2002 est.)
• GDP: composition by sector: agriculture: 5%, industry: 28%, services: 66% (2000
est.)
• Inflation rate (consumer prices): 41% (2002, yearend)
• Labor force: 15 million (1999), Unemployment rate: 21.5% (37377)
• Industries: food processing, motor vehicles, consumer durables, textiles,
chemicals and petrochemicals, printing, metallurgy, steel
• Agriculture products: sunflower seeds, lemons, soybeans, grapes, corn, tobacco,
peanuts, tea, wheat; livestock
• Exports: $25.3 billion (2002), Exports commodities: edible oils, fuels and energy,
cereals, feed, motor vehicles
• Export partners: Brazil 23.6%, US 10.9%, Chile 9.7%, Spain 4.3% (2002)
• Imports: $9 billion (2002), Import commodities: machinery and equipment, motor
vehicles, chemicals, metal manufactures, plastics
• Import partners: Brazil 42%, US 12.8%, Germany 4.4% (2002)
• Debt external: $155 billion (2001 est.)
Analysis and prospects for the future
STRENGTHS
• Generally high rankings in human
capital variables; highly literate,
relatively well educated population,
• Diversified industrial base
• “Catching up”-hypothesis
WEAKNESSES
• Generally very low rankings in economic
variables; recurring economic problems of
inflation, external debt, capital flight, and
budget deficits, unemployment high
• Foreign investment attracted mainly by
protected domestic market
• Problems in the national innovation
system: poor incentive regimes, low
R&D/GDP (and mainly carried out by
public sector)
OPPORTUNITIES
• Economy stabilizing after the crisis of 200102; growth, new governmental programs to
attract hi-tech companies and investments
• Large and knowledgeable ex-patriot scientific
community; knowledge transfers (brain drain
→ brain circulation), government is developing
“Intell/Scien Diaspora Network”
• USA immigration policy after 9/11; decreasing
brain drain or just redirecting it?
THREATS
• Scientific community unsatisfied – threshold
for departing very low
• Weak political institutions and corruption
• Crisis of 2001-02 already destroyed the
intellectual infrastructure? → insufficient
“social capability” in order to “catch up”?
Recommendations
Economic Reforms Science Policy Initiatives
• Convert to a floating
currency valuation system.
• Stop borrowing from the
IMF and private banks to
support government
spending.
• Continue privatization
efforts and other progrowth reforms.
• Reduce bureaucracy and
endemic corruption.
• Increase investment in
education at all levels.
• Generate a compensation
scheme that encourages
graduates to stay for at
least a few years.
• Engage the large
expatriate community of
scientists in providing
technical assistance in
R&D infrastructure and
market reforms.
References
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Nevaer, Louis. “Brain Drain - Troubled Argentina Losing Its Minds.” Pacific News
Service, May 15, 2002
“Argentina: Economy.”
<http://reference.allrefer.com/world/countries/argentina/economy.html> Mar 21, 2004.
Africa “brain drain”: 70,000 scholars leave yearly,”
http://www.warmafrica.com/index/geo/1/cat/5/a/a/artid/208
Gumisai Mutume, “Reversing Africa’s Brain Drain, Zambia Daily Mail,2003,
http://www.queensu.ca/samp/Commentaries/2003/drain.htm
World Economic Forum, “Battling the emerging market brian-drain,” 2000,
http://www.weforum.org/site/knowledgenavigator.nsf/Content/Battling%20the%20emerging%2
0market%20brain-drain_2000?open&topic_id=
U.N. Human Development Report 2001, http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2001/en/pdf/pr5.pdf
Edwin Naidu, “Figures show massive increase in brain drain,” 2003,
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?click_id=594&art_id=ct20040321104139440L152496&set_id=
1
“Expatriates return to Argentina,” International Herald Tribune Online,
http://www.iht.com/articles/131302.html
Feldstein, Martin Argentina's Fall: Lessons from the Latest Financial Crisis Foreign Affairs
Journal March/April 2002.