Download PPT

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Financial literacy wikipedia , lookup

Securitization wikipedia , lookup

Global financial system wikipedia , lookup

Financialization wikipedia , lookup

Systemically important financial institution wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Migrants’ Transfers
1993 SNA para. 14.92
Current treatment
(1) Personal effects:
SNA para. 14.92/BPM5 says exports/imports, by implication
offsetting entry is capital transfer.
(2) Financial assets that are actually transferred to the new
country of residence:
BPM5 says financial account transaction and capital transfer entry.
(3) Financial assets and liabilities that are not transferred:
BPM5 says change of economy of residence is transaction; financial
account and capital transfer entries.
2
Concerns
Change of residence of owner seems more like a
reclassification than a transaction.
(Minor) effect of exports and imports on GDP by
expenditure approach.
3
Question 1
Does the Group agree with the proposal not to record
migrants’ personal effects under imports and exports of
goods (and to amend SNA paragraph 14.92 accordingly)?
The IMF Committee on Balance of Payments Statistics
adopted the proposal that movements of personal
effects should not be recorded as transactions.
4
Question 2
Would the Group like to clarify the recording of the
changes in financial assets and liabilities due to
changes in residence? If so, should the changes in
assets and liabilities position of individuals who
change their residence be recorded under “other
changes in volume of assets”?
The Committee adopted the proposal that other migrants’ transfers would
be treated as other changes in assets. The Committee decided that no
supplementary information on “classification changes due to change of
residence” under “other changes in volume of assets” should be required.
It was noted that the BPM5 term “Migrants’ transfers” assumes there is a
transfer, so it would need to be changed..
5
Question 3
Should the same principles apply to corporations that
change their residence (either due to relocation or to
boundary changes)?
The Committee agreed that the principles established for individuals
changing residence should also apply to corporations in the case of
boundary changes or a single corporation that changed location,
which could arise in the case of a societas europea.
However, it noted that these cases would be exceptional, as most
instances labeled as relocations actually involve assets being
transferred to a new entity. The exceptional case was identified for
societas europea (i.e., a company able to operate in any EU member
country).
6
Question 4
Should clarifying text be added to SNA chapters 11 and 12,
so that the special nature of these economic events is
explicitly outlined?
7
8