Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
War on Drugs in Afghanistan Jessica Kenney Krista Flynt Krista Tuthill Thesis • The war on drugs in Afghanistan undermines the war on terror. Eradication of opium production and trade destabilizes the country and undermines alliances made to counter terrorism. Transnational Actors • The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime • NATO • The World Bank • Afghanistan, Russia, Britain, and the United States Afghanistan’s historical transformation • Cold War – Soviet Invasion and occupation, 19791989 – U.S. supports the Mujaheddin, fighting the Soviet troops – Arms input and financial support – Environment for drug trade Afghanistan’s historical transformation • Pre-Soviet economy • US turns a blind eye to illegal drug trade • Taliban regime, 1996-2001 • Contributors to drug trade Afghanistan’s dependence on opium YouTube video: • Over half (53%) of Afghanistan’s GDP comes from the opium trade. $4 bill. in 2007 • It stabilizes economy • 78% of Afghanis are rural farmers http://youtube.com/watch?v=kwyoq6CrflQ Why farmers grow poppy • Quick return on investment • Poppies require less water • Poppy crop sells for 30x as much profit as wheat • Salaam credit system • Land shortage The case for eradication programs • Drug war is Taliban’s most effective recruiter • Narco-economy may lead to the development of an unstable narco-state with deep seated public corruption • Opium production provides the Taliban with an estimated $30 to $100 million per year • Drug trafficking is corrupting the country’s government and infrastructure US Government actions in Afghanistan • Unauthorized dumping of herbicides over Afghanistan opium fields • Plan Afghanistan • Breakdown of funds • Aerial eradication vs. manual eradication • Role of the US militaryor lack thereof • Plan Afghanistan’s progress today (and looking into the future) The case against eradication programs • President Karzai would lose loyalty from regional warlords • Repressive approach to eradication will result in a loss of Afghani support for their government • Has caused revolts from citizens involved in poppy cultivation in the past • Negative impacts of aerial eradication • Loss of industry would devastate the economy IR Theories • Narco-terrorism (and the subsequent failure of a realist approach) • Realism: through the eyes of Afghanis vs. Americans • Institutionalists: Proposed methods of development Attempted solutions • British crop substitution – Expansion of the opium by farmers who pocketed the money and continued to produce • President Hamid Karzai enacted a reduction policy against the opium poppy economy – Provincial leader reaction YouTube video: http://youtube.com/watch?v=5UM8KxKaeSw Solutions • • Non-military approach to the war on drugs due to interdependence Rebuilding of the infrastructure – Supported crop substitutions – Funding of alternate livelihoods for opium farmers • • • • • Agriculture, irrigation and livestock Rural enterprise development Rural infrastructure Local governance Legalization of opium for medicinal use Questions? • “...to overcome both opium production and terrorism in Afghanistan, the government and the international community should focus less on waging wars on drugs and terrorism and more on implementing a broad program of alternative and integrated development in the whole country. Within this, a multi-level strategy involving effective sanctions on illicit and criminal activities is critical. Such a program should be implemented in a progressive way so as to secure sustainable political and territorial stability. Long-lasting peace combined with political as well as economic development must be achieved if Afghanistan is to be successfully rid of its illicit drugs economy-war economy nexus” (Chouvy). Works Cited • CIA https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/af.html#People • Carpenter, Ted G. 2004. "How the Drug War in Afghanistan Undermines America’s War on Terror." Washington D.C.: Cato Institute. • Koehler, Jan, and Christoph Zuercher. 2007. "Statebuilding, Conflict and Narcotics in Afghanistan: The View from Below." International Peacekeeping 14 (1), 62-74. • New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/11/opinion/11ghani.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&oref=login • ReliefWeb http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900sid/EGUA-78ZQLE?OpenDocument • Slate Magazine http://www.slate.com/id/2110987/ • Terrorism Monitor http://www.pa-chouvy.org/terrorism-monitor-afghanistan-narcoterrorism.html • Transnational Institute: Drugs and Democracy http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?page=policybriefings_brief10 • US Department of State http://usinfo.state.gov/sa/Archive/2006/Jan/31-229671.html ; http://www.state.gov/p/inl/rls/rpt/90561.htm • The World Bank http://siteresources.worldbank.org/SOUTHASIAEXT/Resources/2235461202156192201/4638255-1202156207051/summaryAfghanistanOpium2008.pdf • YouTube http://youtube.com/watch?v=_OBlgSz8sSM&feature=related