Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The WTO GPA: Global Context, Potential Benefits, Opportunities & Challenges Nicholas C. Niggli Head of Economic, Finance, Science & Innovation Section Embassy of Switzerland in the United Kingdom Chairman, Association of Economic Representatives in London (AERL) Chairman, WTO Government Procurement Agreement (2007-2012) EBRD, London EC2A 2JN, 09 December 2014 The views expressed in this presentation are exclusively those of the author and may not be attributed to the WTO, the Swiss Confederation or the AERL Outline •The State as economic actor: Far-reaching economic, fiscal and governance-related implications. •The WTO GPA: Benefits and opportunities arising from this « Swiss army knife » arrangement. •The WTO GPA: How to overcome the challenges and be amongst tomorrow’s winners? •Concluding thoughts 1 The State as economic actor: Far-reaching economic, fiscal and governance-related implications. The State: A mighty economic player • Lots of goods, services and intellectual property to buy / infrastructure to construct to function & provide the best possible public services • Historically, few constraints, little competition & nontransparent markets • High quality & low price: the indispensable mantra in a time of fiscal tightening and growing transparency Globalization: The Four “I”s can’t be ignored! •Integration •Interdependency •IT innovations •Inequality How to improve government efficiency and fiscal latitude while also stimulating growth and promoting good governance? Sound management of Government Procurement helps States to: • Better utilize their (often scarce) resources • Increase their political, economic and fiscal options • Tighten their belts to reduce their debt/GDP ratio 2 The WTO GPA: Benefits and opportunities arising from this « Swiss army knife » arrangement. The GPA? A historical perspective • An instrument originally developed by the OECD • Introduced into the GATT as Tokyo Round Code on GP in 1979 and revised in 1987 • Signature of the first GPA in 1994 • Revision of the GPA agreed to in 2012 and entered into force in 2014 (12 years negotiations) The 2012 GPA: Multiple dimensions and benefits (I) •Rules - Transparency, predictability, non-discrimination, legal certainty - ‘Policy space’ / development considerations: tailor-made approach - Enhanced transitional measures for developing countries - Help provide harmonised procurement regime across region - Locks in reforms while supporting regional integration efforts • Trade: Market Access - States spend about 15-20% of GDP on Procurement - 15 (soon 17) Parties, 43 (soon 45) WTO Members, 28 Observers. - Reciprocal access to $1.7 trillion GPA covered procurement market: guarantees opening towards key economic partners The 2012 GPA: Multiple dimensions and benefits (II) • Governance instrument - International good governance ‘stamp of approval’ - Foster inward investment through many channels - Facilitates global value chain integration • Further benefits and opportunities - The lessons from WTO Accession & DSB protection - Sense of history: Capital & Investment is moving fast - First movers amongst EC’s, DC’s and LDC’s will likely get extra political credit 3 The WTO GPA: How to overcome the challenges and be amongst tomorrow’s winners? Acceding to the GPA - Potential challenges: • Costs of accession • Implementation • Adjustment Barriers might be less high than one thinks! Autonomous reforms as well as FTA’s or RTA’s might already pave the way to the GPA 4 Concluding thoughts: Good governance, the GPA, public infrastructure provision, trade and development Trade, Growth / Devt Public Welfare Public Infrastructure / Services Public Procurement Good Governance Thank you very much for your attention! Nicholas C. Niggli Head of Economic, Finance, Science & Innovation Section Embassy of Switzerland in the United Kingdom Chairman, Association of Economic Representatives in London (AERL) Chairman, WTO Government Procurement Agreement (2007-2012) The views expressed in this presentation are exclusively those of the author and may not be attributed to the WTO, the Swiss Confederation or the AERL