Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
UNCTAD Training course on key issues on the international economic agenda, Belgrade, 18-21 September 2006 Macroeconomic Policies and Regimes in transition, the experience of Serbia Prof. Danica Popović Faculty of Economics and CLDS [email protected] 1 Mind the gap ... Exports and Imports GNFS GMP in FR Yugoslavia, 1960-1996 30 billion USD 20 6.6% ann.gr. 15 stagflation recovery 10 collapse 5 0 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 years 5/23/2017 mlrd. $ 25 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3 -4 1965 imports exports resource gap 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 godine 2 Real GDP Percentage Change Index (1989 = Base), 1989-2004 Poland EU Slovenia Hungary Slovak Czech R Romania Croatia Bulgaria Russia Serbia 140 120 100 80 60 40 19 89 19 1 90 991 5/23/2017 19 92 19 93 19 1 94 995 19 96 19 97 19 1 98 999 20 00 20 01 20 2 02 003 20 04 3 Time consistency … In five years of transition, Serbian economic policy passed through five cycles: reform cycle 2000-mid 2003; abandoning reform in mid-2003 and shifting the focus on issues (to be subsequently given up) of harmonization with the Montenegrin economy, with partial reversal of its own initial foreign trade liberalization; coming into power of a new government (in early 2004),followed by almost nine months of systematic populist steps; and a positive breakthrough and announcements of good reform steps (2005), which resulted from interventions by the IM F, WB and the EU announcement of the initiation of the SAA process as of October 2005. Coming back to populistic policies and national investment plan 5/23/2017 4 Overall results a rising balance of payments deficit of more than 10 percent of GDP, a continuously increasing unemployment rate, which now stands at 32 percent. After four years of transition, GDP is estimated at around US$ 3,500 in per capita terms (around US$ 5,200 in PPP terms), while slightly less than 11 percent of people in Serbia still live below the poverty line. 5/23/2017 5 5/23/2017 6 PRIVATE AND SOCIAL SECTOR In mid-2005 Serbia is, explicitly or implicitly, still subsidizing 75 large socially owned loss-making companies, which employ around 150,000 workers. In addition, the government is adamantly keeping control over public enterprises and public utilities (600,000 employees), which gives a totalof around 40 percent of registered labor. 5/23/2017 7 Transition is all about structural changes 5/23/2017 8 Transition in the 90ties? Statistical tests indicate that the structure of employment by sector has not changed significantly, and thus labor is neither “moving” to propulsive sectors, nor leaving those declining ones. The Lillien measure (calculated as a standard deviation of annual sectoral employment growth rates) for the first four years of transition in Serbia amounts to 3.9 percent. Lillien coefficient for the Czech Republic amounted to 20.9 percent, for Poland to 20.3 percent, for Slovakia to 14 percent, for Hungary to 9 percent, etc. 5/23/2017 9 5/23/2017 10 5/23/2017 11 5/23/2017 12 Inflation and exchange rate 120 112 110 100 90 79 86 80 68 61 70 59 60 58 59 50 41 41 40 30 17 15 13.7 20 8 16 21 10 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 5/23/2017 inflacija dinar/evro 13 5/23/2017 14 5/23/2017 15 5/23/2017 16 5/23/2017 17 5/23/2017 18 5/23/2017 19 5/23/2017 20 5/23/2017 21 Reforms of the pension system, health care system and public administration strongly encroach on the acquired rights, and for that reason a strong political will and a consensus (reached at least in principle) between the government, employers and trade unions, are necessary for their implementation. 5/23/2017 22 PRIVATIZATION METHODS political parties which are running state companies will become losers, hence every announcement of such a possibility provokes an immediate response from party officials, offering an explanation that such solutions are “bad for the country”, whatever that may mean. Experiences show that after privatization, the services of these companies, as a rule, become much better, costs lower and the political influence of new owners, in a good regulatory framework, is much weaker than the influence of political parties which acquire the management rights without investing a single dinar in it and, by rule, without adequate management capacities 5/23/2017 23 HUMAN CAPITAL OUTFLOW 5/23/2017 24 5/23/2017 25 5/23/2017 26 5/23/2017 27 5/23/2017 28 5/23/2017 29 5/23/2017 30 5/23/2017 31 the golden rule - productivity growth has to be at least equal to the sum of real appreciation and real wage growth. 5/23/2017 32 5/23/2017 33