Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
The New Government’s Economic Policy Per Jansson Ministry of Finance Sweden Plan of talk • Some personal data • A few facts about the Government Offices, the Ministry of Finance, and economic policy in general • Facts about the Swedish economy • The new economic policy – Undertaken and planned policy measures – Expected effects (forecasts from Budget Bill and evaluation done by Lars Calmfors) Ministry of Finance Sweden Personal data • • • • PhD 1994; Associate Professor 2000 (Uppsala University) Mainly: general macro (empirical) and monetary policy 10 yrs at the Riksbank, 2 yrs at the NIER Also: FIEF, the Economic Council of Sweden, SJ Ministry of Finance Sweden Ministry of Finance Sweden Office for Administrative Affairs Ministry of Industry, Employ-ment and Communications Ministry of Education Research and Culture Ministry of Finance Ministry of Health and Social Affairs Ministry of Defence Ministry for Foreign Affairs Ministry of Justice Prime Minister’s Office The Government Offices The Government The Ministry of Finance 470 plus employees 50 per cent are women 65% have executive responsibilities 10% have managerial responsibilities Ministry of Finance Sweden average age is about 40 95% are nonpolitical staff 25% have administrative responsibilities most common occupations: economists, lawyers and social scientists Minister Mats Odell Minister for Finance Anders Borg Chief Political Adviser Political Advisers Press Press Political Advisers Legal Secretariat Information Department Departement for Coordination and Support 3 Divisions Ministry of Finance Sweden State Secretary Hans Lindblad State Secretary State Secretary Per Jansson Ingemar Hansson State Secretary Department Economic Affairs International Department Tax and Customs Financial IA Markets 7 Divisions 3 Divisions 3 Divisions 4 Divisions 5 Divisions Budget KLAPublic Administration 5 Divisions State Secretary for economic policy responsible for… • Departments: International Department, Economics Affairs, Division for Structural Policies at Budget Department • In addition: issues related to statistics and government real estates • Government agencies: NIER, Statistics Sweden, the Economic Council of Sweden, the Swedish National Financial Management Authority (ESV), the National Property Board (SFV), the National Fortification Administration Ministry of Finance Sweden Conducting economic policy means… …undertaking measures to influence the national economy. Divided into: - stabilisation policy - distribution policy - structural policy The Ministry of Finance • monitors and analyses the Swedish economy • makes short and long-term forecasts • conducts studies at household and individual level • takes part in international economic work Ministry of Finance Sweden The goals of economic policy… … are set by the Government and the Riksdag, and can broadly be summarised as follows: a stable economy stable prices full employment Ministry of Finance Sweden fair distribution high growth sound public finances Economic policy is implemented through the budget process Government commences preparatory budget work Government submits Spring Budget Bill including proposals for expenditure ceilings to the Riksdag Riksdag approves the budget January • February • March • April • May • June • July • August • September • October • November • December Government agencies supply background budget data Ministry of Finance Sweden The Riksdag approves expenditure ceilings and preliminary frames for the expenditure areas Government submits the Budget Bill to the Riksdag The Swedish economy: since the mid 1990s good macro performance in many respects • Growth higher than previously and higher than in many other countries • Inflation low and stable • Public finances with surplus • Reasonable real and nominal wage increases Ministry of Finance Sweden GDP level and growth rate SEK billion 2800 Per cent 5.0 4. 5 2600 4. 3 4. 3 4.0 4. 1 3. 9 3. 9 3. 7 2400 2200 2. 8 2. 6 2. 9 2. 7 2. 0 1. 9 1. 7 1. 7 1. 1 1. 0 -0. 2 0.0 -1. 1 -1. 2 -1.0 -2. 0 1600 -2.0 80 85 90 Level, constant prices (left scale) Annual change (right scale) Ministry of Finance Sweden 1.0 1. 3 1800 1400 2.0 2. 3 2. 2 1. 2 2000 3.0 3. 4 95 00 05 -3.0 CPI inflation 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 -2 1981 Ministry of Finance Sweden 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 Public savings (percent of GDP) 6 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 -12 -14 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 Note: The dashed line is the forecast in the Budget Bill for 2007. Ministry of Finance Sweden 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Nominal and real wage growth 10 8 6 4 2 -4 Nominal Ministry of Finance Sweden Re al 2004 2002 2000 1998 1996 1994 1992 1990 1988 1986 1984 1982 -2 1980 0 But there are also problems… • • • • Weak labour market development with high absence Equilibrium (un)employment too low (high) It does not pay enough to work Business climate for in particular small companies not as good as it should be • Too few want to employ and run a business • Demographic challenges ahead Ministry of Finance Sweden GDP growth and unemployment 0 8 6 2 4 2 4 0 6 -2 8 -4 -6 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 BNP (vänster) Öppen arbetslöshet, säsongrensad (höger) Ministry of Finance Sweden 10 The Swedish population by labour force status, 2005 Population 9 047 700 19, 5 % 16, 7 % Population, age<16 Population, age>64 1 762 900 1 515 000 63, 8 % Population, age 16 —64 5 769 800 59, 0 % 41, 0 % At work Not at work 3 409 850 2 359 950 36, 1 % Employed, absent from work 852 750 45, 4 % vacation & holidays 387 500 22, 0 % Sick 187 750 11, 5 % 52, 4 % Unemployed Not in the labor force 270 400 1 236 800 32, 5 % Else 277 500 Sickness - & activitucompensation 77 000 383 800 Else 243 800 Ministry of Finance Sweden Retired Full-time students 532 200 Individuals supported by social transfers Thousands of full-time equivalents 1 600 1 400 1 200 Sickness allowance Disability pension Unemployment Labour market programs Social assistance 1 000 800 600 400 200 0 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 Source: SCB, Swedish Social Insurance Administration, National Labour Market Board Ministry of Finance Sweden The difference between going to work and being sick-listed is too small Ministry of Finance Sweden Few new companies established Ministry of Finance Sweden Swedish population growth up to 2050 (change compared to 2006) 1000 65 yearsandolder 800 20-64 years 19 yearsandyounger 600 400 200 0 -200 2005 2010 Ministry of Finance Sweden 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Dependency ratios 0.45 0.45 0.40 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.25 0.25 2005 2010 2015 Äldrekvot Ministry of Finance Sweden 2020 Yngrekvot 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Population growth in the age 20-64 years (change compared to 2006) 500 Bornabroad 400 BorninSweden 300 Total change 200 100 0 -100 -200 -300 2005 2010 Ministry of Finance Sweden 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 The labour market at different points in time 1990 1993 2005 Unemployment 1,5 8,3 5,4 Labor force participation 84,5 77,7 78,0 Employment 83,3 71,2 73,8 Benefit recipients 15,7 22,2 20,4 Ministry of Finance Sweden Possible sources of unemployment persistence Decreasing search activity Calls for: measures that increase search activity and decrease locking-in effects Generous benefits Calls for: measures that make it worthwhile to work The compressed wage structure Calls for: measures that increase the availability of low-skilled jobs at an agreeable wage Stigmatization Calls for: measures that decrease the cost associated with employing jobseekers who have been out of work for a long time Employment protection legislation Ministry of Finance Sweden What is needed? A combination of measures that affect simultaneously: The matching process Labour supply Labour demand Ministry of Finance Sweden Autumn Budget Bill 2007 affects Matching through: Changes in the institutional set-up of labour market policies Individual action plans and coaching Changes in unemployment benefits Lower volumes of labour market programmes Ministry of Finance Sweden Autumn Budget Bill 2007 affects Labour supply through: Earned income tax credit that increase after-tax revenue Changes in unemployment benefits Changes in sick-leave benefits Lower volumes of labour market programmes Ministry of Finance Sweden P AS AD Y Ministry of Finance Sweden Autumn Budget Bill 2007 affects Labour demand through: “New start jobs” targeted at benefit recipients, refuges, and older people Decreased employers’ contributions for youth & older Increased possibilities to time-limited hires and also: Tax reductions on household-related services (in 2007) Tax reductions in various service sectors (in 2008) Ministry of Finance Sweden P AS AD Ministry of Finance Sweden Y P AS AD Y Ministry of Finance Sweden The Swedish labour market according to the Budget Bill 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Employment, percentage change 0,8 1,7 1,5 1,0 0,6 Labour force, percentage change 0,8 1,3 1,8 0,1 0,0 Regular employment rate (20-64) 77,4 77,7 79,0 79,8 80,2 Open unemployment rate 6,0 5,6 5,8 5,0 4,3 123 000 2,7 143 000 3,1 91 000 1,9 64 000 1,4 70 000 1,5 8,7 8,7 7,7 6,3 5,8 Labour market programmes – participants – per cent of labour force Total unemployment rate Ministry of Finance Sweden Effects on income distribution (2007, percentage change) 1,8 1,3 0,8 0,3 -0,2 Kvinnor Stud Socbid Sjuk Heltid Lång deltid Kort deltid Arbetar ej Ålderspens Förtidspens Företagare Tjänstem hög Tjänstem l/m Arbetare 7565-74 55-64 45-54 35-44 25-34 18-24 -17 Ministry of Finance Sweden Män 2,3 Kön (20+) Arbetslös 2,8 Bidrag/stud Sysselsättn Socio Ålder % Effect on income distribution: Gini coefficient 0,30 0,29 B e f o re pro po s a l 0,28 A f t e r pro po s a l 0,27 0,26 0,25 0,24 0,23 0,22 0,21 0,20 1991 Ministry of Finance Sweden 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 Calculation of effects by Lars Calmfors • Approach: use estimates (elasticities) of previous empirical studies (several) to quantify the long-run effects of the different policy measures • Studies considered: – Bassanini & Duval (2006, OECD WP 486) – Forslund, Gottfries & Westermark (2006, CESifo WP 1649) – Forslund & Kolm (2000, IFAU WP 7) – Nickell (2003, CESifo DICE Report 2) Ministry of Finance Sweden Bassanini & Duval (2006): lower unemployment benefits and tax wedge Category Effect in percentage terms Unemployment -1.0 / -0.8 Employment rate, males 25-54 +1.4 / +1.0 Employment rate, females 25-54 +2.4 / +1.8 Employment rate, youth 20-24 +3.2 / +2.7 Ministry of Finance Sweden Forslund et al (2006): lower net replacement rate and reduction of ALMPs Category Effect in percentage terms Wage -1.7 / 0 Open unemployment -1.0 / -0.4 Total unemployment -2.0 / -1.4 Ministry of Finance Sweden Forslund & Kolm (2000) and Nickell (2003) • FK about 1 percentage point larger unemployment effect • Nickell: Change in U = -0.42 – 1.24 x (net no. of ”employment-friendly” reforms) R2 = 0.51, N = 20 => for Sweden this gives 3 x 1.24 = 3.7 percentage points lower unemployment Ministry of Finance Sweden