* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download slides competitiveness
Gender Inequality Index wikipedia , lookup
Transformation in economics wikipedia , lookup
Brander–Spencer model wikipedia , lookup
Economic globalization wikipedia , lookup
Development theory wikipedia , lookup
Heckscher–Ohlin model wikipedia , lookup
International factor movements wikipedia , lookup
Development economics wikipedia , lookup
COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS Objectives o o o Analyzing potential for export growth/diversification Ground the analysis in some sort of economic principles Provide relevant advice to the government Practical leads for action Grounded in factual analysis Robust 1 FOUNDATIONS OF POLICY ADVICE Governments systematically ask for guidance on o Fostering export diversification o Defining sectoral priorities (for government support) What should sector-oriented advice be based on? 1. Comparative advantage 2 ROLAND BERGER’S ANALYSIS FOR THE MOROCCAN GOV (I) Governments systematically ask for guidance on o Fostering export diversification o Defining sectoral priorities (for government support) 3 BACK TO FIRST PRINCIPLES: RICARDO’S PRINCIPLE OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE Economists tend to be wary of those demands: o o o What is the economic rationale for export diversification? Go back to «first principles» What is the rationale for sectoral support/industrial policy? Why should the Government get in? In practice, what is the record of «picking winners» by the government? Back to first principles: Ricardo’s principle of comparative advantage o o o Two countries (Portugal, GB) Two sectors (wine,drape) One production factor (labor), Wine Drape Endowments (here, labor forces) Portugal 8 4 5 UK 1 2 20 Labor productivities 4 PORTUGAL’S COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE Wine 40 Indifference curve Autarky consumption point PPF (production. Possibility frontier) 20 Drape 5 GB’S COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE Wine PPF Autarky consumption point 20 Indifference curve Drape 40 6 INTEGRATED WORLD MARKET UNDER FREE TRADE Under free trade and efficient allocation of resources, countries don’t diversify: they specialize according to comparative advantage Production Consumption Wine Drape Wine Drape Portugal 40 0 20 20 UK 0 40 20 20 Total 40 40 40 40 7 MOVING TO A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE: HECKSCHER-OHLIN Steel Effect of FDI Initial PPF Effect of immigration Textile 8 THE GAINS FROM TRADE REVISITED Production point after structural adjustment Steel Indifference curve Relative price on word market (textile cheaper) Consumption point after SA “trade triangle” PPF Textile Relative autarky price 9 «REVEALED» COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE Balassa’s revealed-comparative advantage index X ki / X i RCA Xk / X i k Numerator: share of product (or sector) k in country i’s exports Denominator: share of that product/sector in world exports Problem: Doesn’t pick up latent comparative advantage 10 TAKING THE THING TO THE REAL WORLD: MEASURING COUNTRY ENDOWMENTS o o o o Human capital measured by workforce’s average educational attainment Physical capital stock measured by investment updated by PIM Arable land per worker Subsoil natural resources stock measured in 1994 and 2000 11 AN ALTERNATIVE MEASURE OF COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE Revealed capital intensity of a product: o o o Take all countries exporting that product Calculate a pseudo-RCA measure for each Take a weighted average of capital endowments using this RCA measure as weight X ki / X i i X ki / X i i k Ki k i i L i k Revealed most intensive in human capital 12 PUTTING THE MEASURE AT WORK Revealed least intensive in human capital 13 ANALYSING EXPORT PORTFOLIOS: COSTA RICA Baseline export portfolio: 1991-3 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Revealed Human Capital Intensity Index 12 12 Export portfolio 2003-5 0 50000 100000 150000 Revealed Physical Capital Intensity Index 0 200000 50000 100000 150000 Revealed Physical Capital Intensity Index 200000 New products 2003-5 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 Revealed Human Capital Intensity Index 12 12 Deaths 2003-5 0 50000 100000 150000 Revealed Physical Capital Intensity Index 200000 0 50000 100000 150000 Revealed Physical Capital Intensity Index 200000 14 SOURCES OF EXPORT GROWTH Intensive margin: higher volumes of existing products & destinations New products Export growth Extensive margin New destinations Sustainability margin: Survival of new products/destinations Largest contributors to export growth (across countries and time) • Intensive margin • New-destination margin 15 SOURCES OF EXPORT GROWTH: CROSS-COUNTRY EVIDENCE Most export growth is at the intensive margin Next come new destinations New products almost negligible! Expanding export relationships New destinations, existing products New products, existing destinations New products to new destinations Death of export relationships Shrinking export relationships -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 16 AN ALTERNATIVE DECOMPOSITION OF INTENSIVE AND EXTENSIVE MARGINS Intensive and extensive margins Hummels-Klenow’s original formulation (product-wise) Let Ki be the set of products exported by country i, 𝑋𝑘𝑖 the dollar value of i’s exports of product k to the world, and 𝑋𝑘𝑊 the dollar value of world exports of product k. The (static) intensive margin is defined by HK as 𝐼𝑀𝑖 = 𝑋𝑘𝑖 𝑊 𝐾 𝑖 𝑋𝑘 𝐾𝑖 In words, the numerator is i’s exports and the denominator is world exports of products that are in i’s export portfolio. The extensive margin (also static) is 𝑋𝑀𝑖 = 𝑋𝑘𝑊 𝑊 𝐾 𝑊 𝑋𝑘 𝐾𝑖 17 UNDERSTANDING THE INTENSIVE AND EXTENSIVE MARGINS Your market share in your export portfolio 1.2 Intensive and Extensive Margin in Products, 1998-08 1 Big fish in a small pond India Indonesia .8 .6 India .4 Vietnam Pakistan .2 Intensive Margin Indonesia 85 Vietnam 90 Pakistan 95 Extensive Margin 1998 2008 Small fish in a big pond 100 Weight of your export portfolio in world trade 18 AN EXTENSION TO GEOGRAPHICAL MARKETS Extension to geographical markets Let Di be the set of destination markets where i exports (anything from one to 5’000 products—it doesn’t matter), XiD the dollar value of i’s total exports to destination d, and XWd the dollar value of world exports to destination d (i.e. d’s total imports). All these dollar values are aggregated over all goods. Intensive margin 𝑖 𝐼𝑀 = 𝐷𝑖 𝑋 𝑊𝑑 Intensive and Extensive Margin in Markets, 1998-08 1.2 𝐷𝑖 𝑋 𝑖𝑑 Your market share in your destination portfolio 𝑋 𝑊𝑑 .8 .6 𝐷𝑊 𝑋 𝑊𝑑 India Small fish in a Vietnam Pakistan big 99.5 100pond Vietnam .4 𝐷𝑖 Indonesia .2 𝑋𝑀 = Intensive Margin 𝑖 Big fish in aIndonesia small pond India 1 Extensive margin Pakistan 97.5 98 98.5 99 Extensive Margin 1998 2008 Weight of your destination portfolio in world trade 19 INDUSTRIAL POLICY: FOUNDATIONS OF POLICY ADVICE 2. Diversification 20 MEASURING EXPORT CONCENTRATION Herfindahl index (i = country, k = product, sik = share of product k in i’s exports) H i k sik 2 1 ni xik k i xik ln i 4 2 Theil index shown on vertical axis: measure of export concentration Income level shown on horizontal axis (GDP per capita) Countries first diversify, then re-concentrate 6 8 Ti 10 Theil index (xik = exports of product k by country i) 0 20000 40000 60000 GDP per capita, PPP (constant 2005 international $) Theil index Fitted values 80000 Theil index, Morocco 21 1 1.5 EXPORT DIVERSIFICATION AT THE FIRM LEVEL OLS FE FE Herfindahl concent. index, by product (1) (2) (3) 0 .5 Estimator Dep. Var. 5 10 15 Log export turnover Herfindahl concentration index, by product 20 25 Log export turnover -0.241 -0.269 -0.312 (55.68)** (36.11)** (29.61)** Log export turnover, squared 0.009 0.010 0.012 (46.20)** (29.36)** (23.66)** Constant 2.371 2.513 2.723 (84.42)** (55.43)** (44.06)** Firm fixed effects Time effects No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Observations R-squared Number of firms 36'349 0.14 36'349 0.15 15'142 24'416 0.18 10'812 Fitted values 22 IS THERE A TRADE-OFF BETWEEN EM AND IM EXPANSION? FIRM-LEVEL EVIDENCE FROM TANZANIA Export volume and geographical concentration at the firm level 0 10 .2 .4 15 .6 .8 20 1 Intensive & extensive margins at the firm level 5 10 15 20 Herfindahl concentration index, by destination 5 Log export turnover Fitted values 10 20 30 Number of export destinations served Log of dollar sales per destination 40 50 Fitted values 0 .2 .4 .6 .8 1 Export volume and product concentration at the firm level 0 5 10 15 20 Log export turnover Herfindahl concentration index, by product Fitted values 23 WHY FOSTER DIVERSIFICATION? THE NATURAL-RESOURCE CURSE AND THE DUTCH DISEASE 24 COMPETITIVENESS INDICES The World Economic Forum’s Global Competitiveness Index The World Bank’s Doing Business index The World Bank’s Logistics Performance index 25 SOURCES OF GROWTH The growth-accounting approach to explaining growth at the country level 1. Start from standard production function, put it in logs Yit Kit Lit H it ln Yit ln Kit ln Lit ln H it 2. Regress GDP on factors of production, get o Predicted value for GDP o “Residual” (unexplained part) 3. Take year-on year growth of both o Growth of predicted part: “acumulation” o Growth of unexplained part: “total factor productivity growth” (TFPG) 26 «PILLARS OF GROWTH»: THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM’S GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS INDEX (GCI) The CGI’s “12 pillars of growth” Accumulation TFPG 27 THE GCI’S SURVEY 15’000 respondents in 142 countries in 2011 Survey structure I. About your company II. Overall perceptions of your economy III. Government and public institutions IV. Infrastructure V. Innovation and technology VI. Financial environment VII. Domestic competition VIII. Company operations and strategy IX. Education and human capital X. Corruption, ethics, and social responsibility XI. Travel and tourism XII. Environment XIII. Health 28 THE GCI’S SURVEY Sampling frame o o o Draw large number of firms, stratified by main sector (agriculture, manufacturing, mining, services) Stratify by firm size (large vs. small) and make two lists (one for small, one for large Draw two separate random samples, one from each list Survey form: ad hoc (face-to-face interviews, online,…) 29 THE INDICATOR’S CONSTRUCTION 30 SHIFTING ENGINES: FROM ACCUMULATION TO TFPG Weights ω Labor productivity growth (captial accumulation), 1971-2013 TFPG, 1971-2013 31 THE BENCHMARK: HAPPY SWITZERLAND Switzerland retains its 1st place position again this year as a result of its continuing strong performance across the board. o o o o o o Switzerland’s scientific research institutions are among the world’s best, and the strong collaboration between its academic and business sectors, combined with high company spending on R&D, ensures that much of this research is translated into marketable products and processes […] Productivity is further enhanced by a business sector and a population that are proactive at adapting latest technologies, as well as by labor markets that balance employee protection with the interests of employers. Public institutions in Switzerland are among the most effective and transparent in the world (7th). Governance structures ensure a level playing field, enhancing business confidence; these include an independent judiciary, a strong rule of law, and a highly accountable public sector. Competitiveness is also buttressed by excellent infrastructure (5th), wellfunctioning goods markets (5th), and highly developed financial markets (7th). Finally, Switzerland’s macroeconomic environment is among the most stable in the world (11th) 32 PROBLEMS IN THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT: SUBSAHARAN AFRICA 33 AN EXAMPLE: RWANDA 34 RWANDA: DRAWBACKS OF THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT 35 AN EXAMPLE: RWANDA 36 AN EXAMPLE: RWANDA 37 MEASURING THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT’S COMPETITIVENESS: THE DOING BUSINESS INDICATOR Business-relevant aspects of the legal & regulatory environment 38 ACADEMIC ATTENTION FOR THE DOING BUSINESS INDICATOR Academic attention has not been tremendous: Annual # of citations of Djankov et al. since publication in the QJE: 39 THE DB’S «TRADING ACROSS BORDERS» INDICATOR A standardized measure of the time and cost of import/export procedures o o o Customs clearance Port/terminal handling (outbound) Inland transportation (inbound) 40 AN EXAMPLE OF THE DB’S INFORMATION: TRADING ACROSS BORDERS FOR INDONESIA 41 ASSUMPTIONS OF THE «TRADING ACROSS BORDERS» INDICATOR Product o o o o o The traded product travels in a dry-cargo, 20-foot, full container load. It weighs 10 tons and is valued at $20,000. The product: Is not hazardous nor does it include military items. Does not require refrigeration or any other special environment. Does not require any special phytosanitary or environmental safety standards other than accepted international standards. Is one of the economy’s leading export or import products. Business o o o o o Has at least 60 employees. Is located in the economy’s largest business city. Is a private, limited liability company. It does not operate in an export processing zone or an industrial estate with special export or import privileges. Is 100% domestically owned. Exports more than 10% of its sales. 42 MEASURING THE COST OF CUSTOMS INEFFICIENCY: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH DB-based literature (cross-country regressions): one-day delay = 1% ad-valorem cost Volpe Graziano (2012) DB criteria exclude 80% of Uruguay’s exports Instead, using customs data (raw transaction files) Aggregate at firm-product-destination-year level Construct clearance-time variable at the transaction level as clearance date minus request date; average it by firm-product-destination-year o Run DID regression of export growth at the fpdt level against customs delays also at fpdt level o o o o ln X fpdt D fpdt fpd ft pdt u fpdt Result o Highly significant and negative; o One-day delay = 0.5% ad-valorem; lower than cross-country regression estimates 43 DB COMPOSITION DB indicators and sub-indicators 44 THE DB INDICATOR: SOURCES OF INFORMATION Most of the DB’s informants are lawyers, not business firms However process involves numerous checks: o o o Additional informants World Bank country offices Country reps at the World Bank and numbers are very small 45 IS LESS REGULATION ALWAYS BETTER? Less regulation is preferable across all parts of the distribution and in all countries. The ratings do not allow for a minimum desirable level of regulation needed to ensure public benefits. This principle is embedded in 7 of the 10 indicators and is especially prominent in the following 3 indicators: Employing workers: The fewer the restrictions on hours of work and the more easily a firm can lay off redundant workers, the better the ranking. The 10 top-ranked countries include 5 developed countries with high-quality labor laws, but also 5 small island states, some with inadequate labor protections. Dealing with licenses: The fewer the steps needed to get a permit to construct a building, the higher the score. Possible benefits from safety and environmental checks are not considered. Paying taxes: The lower the overall tax rate as a share of a firm’s profit, the higher the score. Among the 10 top-rated countries on this indicator are Maldives, Oman, Singapore, and the United Arab Emirates. Each of these has special characteristics that make it an unsuitable role model for other countries seeking an optimal level of corporate taxation. Source: Independent Evaluation Group (2008), Doing Business: An Independent Evaluation; Washington: DC: The World Bank. 46 A FEW EXAMPLES FROM LABOR REGULATION 47 THE LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE INDEX 48 THE LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE INDEX: SIX CORE COMPONENTS 1. The efficiency of customs and border management clearance, rated from “very low” (1) to “very high” (5) in survey question 10. 2. The quality of trade and transport infrastructure, rated from “very low” (1) to “very high” (5) in survey question 11. 3. The ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, rated from “very difficult” (1) to “very easy” (5) in survey question 12. 4. The competence and quality of logistics services, rated from “very low” (1) to “very high” (5) in survey question 13. 5. The ability to track and trace consignments, rated from “very low” (1) to “very high” (5) in survey question 14. 6. The frequency with which shipments reach consignees within scheduled or expected delivery times, rated from “hardly ever” (1) to “nearly always” (5) in survey question 15 49 THE LPI METHODOLOGY o o 1000 respondents around the world (143 countries) Essentially logistics firms: Warehousing & distribution Logistics solutions Courier services Bulk cargo transport Containerized transport o o 69% in developing countries 18% large firms (more than 250 employees) o Each respondent rates eight export markets chosen with complicated sampling frame Six components of logistics-friendliness aggregated by CPA o 50 LOGISTICS IN AFRICA 51 AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO MEASURING TRADE COSTS: THE GRAVITY EQUATION 52