Download CA‐NLH‐019  BDE to Western Avalon Line  Page 1 of 2 Q. 

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Chirp spectrum wikipedia , lookup

Bode plot wikipedia , lookup

Pulse-width modulation wikipedia , lookup

Transmission line loudspeaker wikipedia , lookup

Electrification wikipedia , lookup

Transformer types wikipedia , lookup

Earthing system wikipedia , lookup

Islanding wikipedia , lookup

Utility frequency wikipedia , lookup

Buck converter wikipedia , lookup

Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup

Fault tolerance wikipedia , lookup

Power engineering wikipedia , lookup

Amtrak's 25 Hz traction power system wikipedia , lookup

Alternating current wikipedia , lookup

Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup

History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup

Memory disambiguation wikipedia , lookup

Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
CA‐NLH‐019 BDE to Western Avalon Line Page 1 of 2 1 Q. Has Hydro determined whether compliance will be required in terms of its practice 2 of having multiple transformers connected to the same high voltage bus and the 3 requirement to remain stable with no loss of load for a three phase fault on the 230 4 kV? 5 6 7 A. As noted in Hydro's response to CA‐NLH‐005, a high level review of NERC and NPCC 8 transmission planning criteria would put the issue of multiple 230 kV transformers 9 connected to a common 230 kV bus with no dedicated 230 kV circuit breaker 10 outside of the compliance requirements of both NERC and NPCC standards. This is 11 because the transformers under consideration on the Island Interconnected System 12 would not be defined as bulk electric system elements under NERC definitions, or 13 bulk power system elements under NPCC definitions. 14 15 With respect to the requirement to remain stable with no loss of load for a three 16 phase fault on the 230 kV system, the existing isolated Island Interconnected 17 System will remain stable for three phase faults on the 230 kV system. Loss of load 18 is expected for a 230 kV fault at the following locations: 19 20 
21 22 loss of generation and under frequency load shedding; 
23 24 25 TL247, TL248 or Deer Lake 230 kV bus will trip the Cat Arm plant resulting in TL209 or Stephenville will result in loss of Stephenville Terminal Station which is radially fed from Bottom Brook Terminal Station; 
TL208 or Voisey’s Bay Nickel Terminal Station will result in loss of Vale load as it is radially fed from Western Avalon Terminal Station; 
1 CA‐NLH‐019 BDE to Western Avalon Line Page 2 of 2 TL263 will result in loss of Granite Canal plant and potential loss of load due 2 to under frequency load shedding depending upon system load at time of 3 fault; 
4 5 of load due to under frequency load shedding; and 
6 7 8 9 TL234 will result in loss of Upper Salmon and Granite Canal plants with loss Holyrood 230 kV bus will result in reduced power output or full trip of plant resulting in load loss due to under frequency load shedding. Following completion of the new Bay d’Espoir to Western Avalon transmission line, 10 the Labrador – Island HVdc Link (LIL) and the Maritime Link (ML), the system will 11 remain stable for all 230 kV three phase faults except the three phase fault at Bay 12 d’Espoir with two high inertia synchronous condensers in service at Soldiers Pond. 13 Operation of three high inertia synchronous condensers at Soldiers Pond will 14 reduce the exposure to system instability for the three phase fault at Bay d’Espoir. 15 With respect to load loss for a 230 kV three phase fault following completion of the 16 Bay d’Espoir to Western Avalon transmission line, LIL and ML, faults on TL208 and 17 TL209 are the only contingencies identified.