* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Distributed Generation at Clemson University
Electrical ballast wikipedia , lookup
Mercury-arc valve wikipedia , lookup
Current source wikipedia , lookup
Stepper motor wikipedia , lookup
Chirp spectrum wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Resistive opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Immunity-aware programming wikipedia , lookup
Single-wire earth return wikipedia , lookup
Voltage regulator wikipedia , lookup
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Amtrak's 25 Hz traction power system wikipedia , lookup
Surge protector wikipedia , lookup
Ground (electricity) wikipedia , lookup
Power electronics wikipedia , lookup
Distribution management system wikipedia , lookup
Electrical substation wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
Fault tolerance wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Impact of Distributed Generation on Fault Induced Transients: A Case Study Sukumar Brahma Adly Girgis Clemson University Electric Power Research Association Clemson University Clemson SC 29634 Introduction • This presentation analyzes following transients in a distribution system with/without the presence of DG in an actual 22 bus system: Transients due to Single Phase Faults Transients due to Three Phase Faults • Effect of Grounding of DG is Observed • Effect of Distance of fault from DG is observed Modeling • 22 bus distribution feeder modeled on PSCAD • DG is modeled as a synchronous generator with exciter and governor • Interconnecting transformer assumed Y connected on system side • System loads modeled as constant power loads • Lines modeled as coupled PI circuit Distribution Feeder Considered for Analysis 1550 1549 SUBSTATION 1644 16 16 46 1551 1647 BUS 0 45 1552 16 48 1553 16 4 ALL LINE SECTIONS 3 (ABC) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9 1653 1651 1650 1554 1555 1556 2 165 1668 A 1667 AB 16 66 1569 16 5 6 1560 1 60 658 6 1 1563 16 1558 1657 1570 1571 DG connected to this bus 1559 16 55 61 65 1568 16 1566 1561 1659 1572 1654 1573 1562 DG Capacity 30% of Feeder Load Single Phase Fault Without DG 3565 A 25% Increase Three Phase Fault Without DG 5635 kV 25% Overshoot Single Phase Fault With DG 188% more than without DG 25% Increase after DG is Disconnected • Worse in terms of current • Better in terms of voltage Three Phase Fault With DG 75% more than without DG 25% Overshoot Same as without DG Single Phase Fault With DG Reactance- Grounded 101% more than without DG Voltage profile worsens Single Phase Fault Away From DG Decreases No Perceptible Change Three Phase Fault Away From DG Increases for this case High frequency transient more, but overshoot reduces Conclusion • Without DG, single phase faults can be more severe in terms of voltage and three phase faults in terms of current. • Due to DG, transient fault current peaks increase for both types of fault. • Transient voltage rise when fault clears is same with/without DG • If DG is solidly grounded, voltage rise of healthy phases for single-phase faults can be less severe, but single-phase currents can increase drastically. • If DG is grounded through impedance, single-phase fault currents would get less severe, but voltage rise of healthy phases can get worse. • For single-phase faults away from DG, currents reduce, but the same cannot be said for three-phase fault currents. There is a decrease in overshoot when three phase fault is cleared. • High frequency transients introduced in voltage waveform takes about the same time to die down with or without DG. The time taken in the case studied here was around half a cycle.