Download Interorganizational Context

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act wikipedia , lookup

Systemically important financial institution wikipedia , lookup

Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Ethics
• Ethics is the application of reason to guide conduct so that it is
consistent with the value system to which we subscribe
• Sources of ethical dilemmas
– Conflict among responsibilities (Legislator wants one thing
but rules or professional standards dictate something else)
• Conflict between responsibilities and personal needs (work
schedule and personal life)
• Obligations or rules that are unclear
Ethical dilemma
• While on patrol you pull over a car that is weaving all
over the road. You walk up to the driver’s side and
discover the driver is your father-in-law. He is drunk as a
skunk.
What do you do?
Moral philosophies
• Absolutism: any breach of a value system is wrong
– 18th. Century philosopher, Immanuel Kant, said that it
would even be wrong to misdirect a potential murderer who
is looking for his quarry.
• Relativism: no absolute rules of behavior - moral judgments
must take context into account.
– Utilitarianism (a branch of relativism) holds that behavior
should be judged by its consequences:
• A 19th. Century utilitarian philosopher, John Stuart Mill,
stated that actions are right to the extent that they
produce a benefit “to all concerned”.
Ethical dilemma
• You have no evidence against the “number one man” of a
criminal organization. You have barely enough to arrest the
“number two man”. He is weak-willed, and if he winds up in
handcuffs, away from the “gang”, he might be sufficiently
scared to confess and implicate his boss.
Naturally that would place him in a lot of legal and personal
trouble.
What do you do? Evaluate your options using absolutist and
utilitarian approaches
Legislative decisions
• Special interests
– Legislative decrees must mediate between the interests of
various groups and constituencies
• Personal interests
– Individual goals and desires may conflict with public roles
• Furthering non-government jobs and careers
• Furthering the interests of family and friends
• Fundraising and “pay to play”
Administrative decisions
• Policies or recommendations should be consistent with
legislative intent, which supposedly reflects the will of the
people
• Assuring responsiveness
– Limit discretion with detailed legislation
– Supervision and inspection
– Educating administrators in their responsibility to act in the
public interest
– Insure that agency personnel are representative of
population
– Involve citizens in making decisions
Individual decisions
• Conflicts of interest
– Personal gain
– Family and friends
• Recusal
• Vetting
Privatization
• Issues:
– Profit motive overrides other values
– Unequal distribution of products or services
– No public input into decisions
• Fixes:
– Use nonprofit organizations
– Detailed contractual language
– “Accountability structures” - supervision and inspections are especially important when liberty interests are involved
Federal ethics rules
• Conflicts of interest
– Cannot decide or advise as to matters in which self, family
or close associates have a financial interest
– Cannot accept gifts in connection with position, or from a
subordinate (Exception: non-cash gifts worth $20 or less)
• Political activities
– Employees who are not SES or law enforcement can on
their own time participate in most political activities,
including running for nonpartisan office
– Cannot run for partisan office, solicit money, accept
volunteer services from a subordinate, or be identified by
govt. position
• Endorsements
– Cannot intervene with the Govt. on behalf of others
– Cannot officially endorse a private enterprise
• Private gain
– Cannot use travel credits or upgrades for self
– After leaving permanently banned from representing others
before the Govt. on an issue in which they participated
– Two-year ban when matters were under their respb’y, but
they did not “personally and substantially” participate
– To prevent “influence peddling” and “revolving door”,
procurement officials involved in contracts greater than $10
million barred from accepting compensation from
contractors for one year after leaving the government
• Financial disclosures
– Yearly financial disclosure form required for Federal
supervisory and management employees
• Major obligations (other than mortgage or car)
• Securities held
• Private financial interests that might conflict with
official responsibilities
Lobbying
• Strictly regulated – Federal and State
– California Secretary of State
• Requirements to register
• Prohibitions on giving valuable gifts to legislators and staff
Waste, fraud and abuse
• “Whistle-blowing” by employees and the public
• Professional organizations and codes of ethics
– Example - American Society for Public Administration
– Inspections and audits
– Internal investigative units (US Dept. of Defense OIG)
• Organizations
– “Ethics audit” – review an organization’s values
• Ethics audit of General Dynamics, which had many
defense contract violations, revealed cultural agreement
that the Govt. was an “adversary” and that it was ok to
take an advantage
– Integrity training