Download No Slide Title

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Soil food web wikipedia , lookup

Tillage wikipedia , lookup

Earthworm wikipedia , lookup

Cover crop wikipedia , lookup

Pedosphere wikipedia , lookup

Soil microbiology wikipedia , lookup

Human impact on the nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup

Plant nutrition wikipedia , lookup

Nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Research Sites
The first thing we did was take soil and worm samples
from three different sites. The sites were the Grant High
School garden, Ella’s home garden, and MLK’s
community garden.
MLK’s
Community
Garden
Grant High School
Garden
Ella’s Family
Garden
Worm Results
10

8
WORMS
6
4
2
0
-2
E
G
SITE
M
Ella’s Family Garden
has more worms than
the other gardens
because her father
adds an abundance of
leaves to it. The leaves
supply food(organic
matter & carbon) for
the worms and
provides shade for
them to live.
Nitrogen Results

Oneway Analysis of NITROGEN By SITE
60
NITROGEN
50
40
30
20
10

0
E
G
SITE
M
Grant’s nitrogen levels
were considerably high
because there were
Fava beans planted in
that area. Fava beans
provide the soil with
nitrogen.
The other gardens
levels were low
because they probably
didn’t do anything to
increase the nitrogen
levels, like plant beans
or add fertilizer.
pH Results

Ella’s Family garden is
significantly below our
expected standards.
This might have had
been caused from an
overdose of leaves.
Over time too much
organic matter causes
the soil to be very
acidic.

Grant’s and MLK’s
levels were in the best
range for growing most
vegetables and flowers
Oneway Analysis of Ph By SITE
8.5
8
7.5
Ph
7
6.5
6
5.5
5
4.5
E
G
M
SITE