Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Exotic Species Introductions into Lake Champlain: the Role of Canals J. Ellen Marsden, School of Natural Resources, University of Vermont Michael Hauser, Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Mark Malchoff, Lake Champlain Sea Grant THE PAST THE PRESENT Human activities in and around Lake Champlain since the arrival of settlers have led to the deliberate and accidental introduction of exotic species, such as plants, snails, and sport fishes. Beginning in the early 1800s, canals were built to connect Lake Champlain with the Great Lakes, Mohawk River, and Hudson River. These canals increased the transport of exotic species from and between neighboring watersheds. Lake Champlain currently contains over 40 exotic species, including several nuisance species – sea lamprey, zebra mussels, water milfoil, and water chestnut; at least 40% arrived in the lake via canals. THE FUTURE Lake Champlain’s recreational value for anglers, boaters, swimmers, and beachgoers is significantly impacted by exotic species. Native species are threatened by competition with exotics: for example, native plants are often overwhelmed by invasions of fastgrowing non-natives, and restoration of lake trout and Atlantic salmon is threatened by predation from sea lamprey. The rate of exotic species introductions into Lake Champlain has increased over the past several decades, and will likely continue; there are at least 10 exotic species in nearby waterways that are poised to enter the lake. Several of these, including fishes (round goby, ruffe), zooplankton (spiny water flea, fishhook flea), and molluscs (Asian clam, quagga mussel) are likely to cause ecological and economic problems if introduced. In 2002, 20% of muskellunge and northern pike in the northern part of the lake were infected with a lympho-sarcoma, previously unknown in the lake. Vectors of exotic species introductions St. Lawrence R. Credit: USGS Fish-hook flea (Cercopagis pengoi) Ruffe (Gymnocephalus cernuus) Credit: Wisconsin Sea Grant Lake Champlain and its canals have also served as a conduit for invasions between other previously isolated watersheds. An estimated 16 species have moved between the Hudson River, Great Lakes, and St. Lawrence River drainages using the Champlain Canal and Lake Champlain as an invasion route. Credit: USFWS Credit: Dept. of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada Shipping Richelieu River Chambly Canal - 1843 Vector Bait Credit: Bernie May Escapes Quagga mussel Stocked (Dreissena bugensis) Credit: Great Lakes Fishery Commission Unknown Lake Champlain Source: www.foodsubs.com Canals 0 5 10 15 20 Number of species The majority of exotic species for which we know the route of introduction entered the lake via canals, built in the 1800s, that link Lake Champlain with adjacent waterways. These canals were built to facilitate shipping between the Hudson River, St. Lawrence River, and Lake Champlain, but provide an easy passage for aquatic species. Champlain Canal - 1823 Hudson River Rusty crayfish and other exotic crayfish compete with native species and may damage aquatic vegetation Crustaceans 14% Other 5% Fish 29% Sea lamprey prey on salmon and trout, causing significant problems for the fishery and species restoration Molluscs 25% Can we halt the invasions? Round goby (Neogobius melanostomus) To stop future invasions of the Lake Champlain basin, each of the potential vectors needs to be managed. Progress is underway: • Legislation to manage bait fish introductions in Vermont was passed in 2002 • Stocked fishes are managed by state agencies; new species are unlikely to be added through normal fisheries management activities • Accidental releases may be reduced by educating the public about the problems due to exotic species However, canal introductions represent a major source of exotic species invasions. Our research, involving input from a wide variety of stakeholders, is directed at finding an optimal barrier to exotic species transfer through the Champlain Canal. Potential options include chemical, electrical, biological, or physical barriers. Plants 27% Exotic species in Lake Champlain, by taxon Timeline of exotic species introductions into Lake Champlain 14 10 year of arrival year of first sighting (arrival date unknown) 8 6 4 Country of origin Number of species Sources of exotic species in Lake Champlain 12 Eurasia US Atlantic coast New Enland 2 Hudson/St. Lawrence 0 <1920 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 Decade of arrival (or first sighting) The rate of exotic species introductions into Lake Champlain has been gradually increasing; four species have entered the lake already since 2000. This trend has also been noted in the Great Lakes, and may be related to increased human activity in the basin. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Number of species The majority of exotic species in Lake Champlain originated from Europe and Asia; most of these species were introduced elsewhere in the US before they arrived into Lake Champlain Credit: Mystic River Watershed Assoc. Dense colonies of zebra mussels can kill native mussels, alter aquatic food webs, and foul water intake pipes and other underwater structures Water chestnut, water milfoil, and a variety of other aquatic plants can outcompete native species and reduce habitat and food availability for ducks, fish and wildlife. They also cause severe problems for boaters and swimmers. Lock 12 on the Champlain Canal – route of boaters, kayakers, and exotic species into Lake Champlain Acknowledgements: This study was funded by National Sea Grant under a special appropriation; particular appreciation goes to Senator Patrick Leahy for his recognition of the need for this work. Photo credits: J. Ellen Marsden, unless otherwise noted