Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Photosynthesis wikipedia , lookup
Renewable resource wikipedia , lookup
Pleistocene Park wikipedia , lookup
Nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup
Plant breeding wikipedia , lookup
Lake ecosystem wikipedia , lookup
Human impact on the nitrogen cycle wikipedia , lookup
Definitions: Herbivory • Herbivory is a special case of predation referring solely to the consumption of plants – herbivory differs from predation in that the prey are most often only partially consumed, which is termed grazing (feeding on grasses) or browsing (feeding on shrubs) – when seeds are eaten or the entire plant (e.g., a phytoplankon cell) is consumed, this is predation The importance of herbivory to marine ecosystems • It is the first step in the transfer of energy in nearshore food webs • It provides a major trophic link for the cycling of nutrients within these food webs • It often affects the productivity and structure of plant communities Anecdotal evidence for the importance of grazing in marine ecosystems • Densities of herbivorous fishes can average well over 10,000 individuals/hectare (Horn, 1989) • Standing stocks on unfished reefs in the Great Barrier Reef can reach 45 metric tons/km2 (Williams and Hatcher, 1983) • In the Caribbean, parrotfishes can graze at rates of over 150,000 bites per m2/day (Carpenter, 1986). Community level impacts of herbivores: what should the evidence look like? Community Domination Habitat (grazer) Low levels of grazing Freshwater Lakes (zooplankton) Naked and/or large phytoplankton Small phytoplankton or species with reduced vulnerability to grazing (e.g., gelatinous sheaths) Coral Reef (fish) Fast growing, erect, highly palatable algae Slow growing, chemically or morphologically defended algae (e.g., coralline algae) Kelp Forests (urchins) Large erect strands of kelp Coralline pavements High levels of grazing Meta analysis shows big effects of herbivores on plants in marine ecosystems Plant log ratio [ln(NP+/NP-)] Shurin et al. 2002,Ecology Letters 5:785 3 2 marine benthos lentic plankton 1 lentic benthos 0 stream benthos marine plankton terrestrial -1 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 Herbivore log ratio [ln(NP+/NP-)] 1 Marine theory is drawn from terrestrial ecosystems Important differences between marine and terrestrial plants • • • • Land forms long lived slow growing rich in stored energy • • • • Sea forms short lived rapid growth do not store energy Differences between Primary Producers Differences in herbivore size Aquatic plants are more nutritious from Cebrian (1999) Am. Nat. 154: 449-468 Herbivory: Why is the world green? • Why don’t herbivores consume more of the plants that are available to them? – Maybe herbivores aren’t food limited (predators control herbivore density) – alternatively the plants are not as available (palatable) as they appear to us Hypothesized top-down control of communities Consumers Rule (HSS,1960) Predators Herbivores Plants Large consumers are now rare in most coastal ecosystems. A few examples: Bluefin tuna Green turtles Goliath groupers Plant defenses • Low nutritional (nitrogen content) quality • Morphology (spines or tough tissues) • Chemicals (secondary compounds) Predators Herbivores Plants Plant defense strategies: low nutritional value hypothesis • Variance in N content, as expressed by the C/N ratios of plants, could determine herbivore foraging selectivity – Simple comparisons of benthic algae and rooted macrophytes do not support this conclusion • Moreover the utility of C/N ratios as a predictive tool has never been verified for marine organisms • Many marine vascular plants are rich in cellulose and therefore indigestible – Differences in gut pH, microbial symbionts and presence of cellulase in some marine may aid in digestion of otherwise undefended plants Herbivores can compensate for sub-optimal diets • Physiological mechanisms – Compensatory feeding: adjustments in feeding rates and efficiency – Gut retention time is low – Metabolic transformations Linkages between plant defenses Nitrogen content Structure Chemicals Structural defense = low nutritional value? High Secondary metabolite content = low N content? **Multiple defense strategy against generalist herbivore? Carbon nutrient balance hypothesis (Bryant 1983) • The Carbon : Nutrient Balance (CNB) Hypothesis, also known as the Environmental Constraint Hypothesis, suggests that variation in plant defense is based on the availability of nutrients in the environment – Plants growing in nitrogen-poor soils will use carbon-based defenses (mostly digestibility reducers), while those growing in low carbon environments are more likely to produce nitrogenbased toxins. Secondary metabolites and nitrogen • Inverse relationship found for some plants (CNBH) Nutrient limited Low nitrogen High secondary metabolites High nitrogen High nutrients Low secondary metabolites Plant apparency model • The Plant Apparency Model (Feeny,1976) has been one of the most influential models of plant-herbivore interactions. – This model contrasts two very different types of plants and seeks to explain apparent differences in their defense strategies Plant Apparency Theory • Plants dominating a community are ‘bound to be found’ by herbivores (i.e., they are apparent) • Such plants should invest heavily in generalized defenses that are effective against a broad range of herbivores – Polyphenolics (tannins) might fill this role by acting as digestibility reducers that allowed little counteradaptation by herbivores. Tannins were termed quantitative defenses because they were thought to function in a dose dependent manner • In contrast, fast-growing plants with unpredictable distributions are unapparent because they are more likely to escape many herbivores – Because they allocate more resources to rapid growth, reproduction, and dispersal, unapparent plants should produce inexpensive toxins (qualitative defenses) that are effective in low doses against generalist herbivores Defense Strategies: Secondary Compounds • Types of chemical defenses: – quantitative • examples include tannins and resins which occupy as much as 60% of a plant’s leaf dry mass • these compounds were thought to deter specialized herbivores via reduction of cell wall digestibility. This is true for vertebrates but not for insects – qualitative • comprise < 2% of a plants leaf dry mass • examples include alkaloids and phenols • deter generalist herbivores • are toxins that alter an herbivore’s metabolism, by blocking specific biochemical reactions. Plant apparency theory: some predictions Marine Plant Apparency • Predicts that apparent seaweeds such as kelps should have high levels of phlorotannins relative to less apparent fucales – Available data show the opposite pattern • Both within and among genera, phlorotannins are common and in relatively high abundance in temperate brown algae but almost completely absent from similar tropical species – This is opposite of what would be predicted as herbivory is extreme on tropical coral reefs, and pholorotannins appear to be effective defenses against tropical herbivores Examples Apparent Less Apparent Defense Strategies: Morphology • Types of morphological defenses: – Tough tissues • examples include leathery macrophytes such as kelps or rockweeds Defense Strategies: Morphology • Types of morphological defenses: – Calcified tissues • Examples include red calcareous algae (L) and tropical algae such as Halimeda and Penicillus (R) Associational Defenses An associational defense is protection gained by an organism from living in association with another species. Associational Refuges • Palatable seaweeds can persist in herbivore-rich communities if they grow on or beneath herbivoreresistant competitors – A number of palatable seaweeds can be found under the canopy of Stypopodium zonale (see picture) – Palatable algae can be found under unpalatable seaweeds like Sargassum filipendula Strong Dictyota preference by amphipods reduces predation risk from pinfish Duffy and Hay (1991) Ecology Duffy and Hay (1994) Ecology Herbivores such as ascoglossan gastropods sequester algal toxins and use them as defenses from predators Moon Snail Blue Sea Slug Sea Hare Additional evidence from the Study of Marine Communities • Investigation and description of community pattern • Any study of interacting species is a community level study • Investigations of the processes that determine community properties The Scientific Method Conclusions Interpretation Experimentation Hypothesis formulation Observations Observations Chthamalus juveniles Chthamalus adults Balanus Observations Juveniles barnacles Adults barnacles Predatory Whelks Example Specific plant and animal (invertebrate) McGlathery 1995—No relationship; ate similar amounts in eutrophied vs. uneutrophied sites Valentine and Heck 2001— negative relationship; ate more of low nitrogen than high nitrogen Alternative examples Bjorndal 1985—Positive relationship; feeding plots revisited Madam Margene’s thesis work: Sparisoma radians -bucktooth parrotfish • Model herbivore • Resident of Caribbean grass beds • Feeds at nearly constant intensity throughout the day • Prefers T. testudinum Madam Margene results! – Results of these lab experiments and field experiments showed that when given a choice, these herbivores consistently choose high nitrogen plants • Perhaps herbivores are not as dumb as they look 100 80 40 Choice trials 35 p < 0.001 30 25 20 15 Percent T. testudinum consumed / 2 h • Offered bucktooth parrotfishes paired choices between nitrogen-rich and unenriched turtlegrass leaves 10 5 0 HIGH Nitrogen LOW Nitrogen 100 80 30 No-choice trials p < 0.01 25 20 15 10 5 0 HIGH Nitrogen LOW Nitrogen Secondary metabolites and nitrogen • Inverse relationship found for some plants (CNBH) Nutrient limited Low nitrogen High secondary metabolites High nitrogen High nutrients Low secondary metabolites Parrotfish Bites Seagrass Herbivory: direct evidence of consumption Urchin Bites Response Variables: Grazing Intensity Area Before Deployment 31.90 cm2 Area After Deployment 29.05 cm2 Leaf loss = 2.85 cm2 Leaf Loss/Leaf Offered = Grazing Intensity Direct estimates find seagrass grazing to be intense A 30 May 1996 500 10 400 300 5 200 % daily NAPP lost/shoot 100 B B 0 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 30 • Grazing varied greatly with season and location July 1996 B 0 14 12 10 8 6 AB 4 A 2 0 0.6 November 1996 25 0.5 20 0.4 15 0.3 10 0.2 5 0.1 0 0.0 Hawk Pickles Small Channel Patch Reefs % biomass offered removed/shoot/day 1400 1200 600 • In some months grazing exceeded seagrass production • On average, some 80% of net aboveground primary production is consumed by small parrotfishes • Herbivores do not graze uniformly across any marine landscape and seagrass are no different! Source: Kirsch et al. 2002. Marine Ecology Progress Series Methodological Issues • Reliance on static measures as indicators of grazing can grossly underestimate grazing pressure • Grazing can stimulate Primary Production! Seagrass Herbivory: seagrass structure and growth may mask grazer impacts sequential leaf production increased shoot recruitment & belowground branching inaccessible apical & basal meristems physiological integration clonal growth high carbohydrate reserves The seagrass grazing paradigm “In both the saltmarsh and seagrass communities, little of the primary production is consumed by herbivores” C. M. Lalli and T. C. Parsons. 1993. Biological Oceanography, An Introduction, Pergamon Press Plankton- Zooplankton • Copepods, tiny crustaceans about the size of a grain of rice, • Copepods are the primary herbivores in the water column making up some 70-90% of herbivore biomass • Copepods are a primary food source for the larval fish. Food Web Alteration Hypothesis Historical overharvesting of large vertebrate herbivores has led to reduced levels of seagrass grazing 1. green turtles 2. manatees & dugongs 3. waterfowl (ducks & geese) Marine food webs are resilient with high levels of functional redundancy. Parrotfishes Redhead Ducks Brent Geese Various Crustaceans Sea Urchins Nereid Polychaetes