Download Hard Substrate Communities

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Asteroid mining wikipedia , lookup

Biogeography wikipedia , lookup

Soundscape ecology wikipedia , lookup

Latitudinal gradients in species diversity wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup

Storage effect wikipedia , lookup

Drought refuge wikipedia , lookup

Lake ecosystem wikipedia , lookup

Habitat wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Hard Substrate Communities
Hard substrate = rocks, old shells,
pilings, jetties, piers, docks
Intertidal – perhaps best know marine
community
Tides = periodic rise and fall of sea
level
• Caused by gravitational attraction of sun
and moon and centrifugal force generated
by the rotation of the earth-moon system
around the sun
• Periodicity of 24 hours, 50 minutes
• gravitational attraction: sun and moon pull
at the Earth’s oceans, causing a tidal
bulge
• the tidal influence of the Moon is about
twice that of the Sun
• Two classifications of tide based on the
orientation of the Sun and Moon.
• Spring tide : Sun, Moon and Earth are all
in a line (full or new moon), Sun and
Moon act together to create one large
tidal bulge, and causes the greatest tidal
differences because the.
• Neap tide: Sun and Moon are at right
angles from each other (quarter moon
phase), when the, smaller tidal bulge.
• distance of Moon: 50K km difference.
perigee (nearest), the gravitational pull is
~40% greater than at apogee (farthest).
• Approximately two high tides and two low
tides each day
• when it is high tide at one coastal
location, it is low tide along a different
coast a quarter of the way around the
Earth.
• Bay of Fundy, eastern Minas Basin, on the
- Moon near perigee @ spring tide, HT up
to 16 meters above LT.
• The geogr. location, shape of the
shoreline, water depth key reasons for
tidal variations.
Result of the tides –
• Exposure in the air for periods every day
– Greater temperature differences
– Desiccation/water loss – time of exposure
changes as tide advances
– Intense solar radiation
Waves
• Mechanical effect
• Creates a “splash zone”
• Mixing – chemicals, dissolved gases,
suspended particles
Salinity changes
• Rainfall, freshwater runoff
• Tidal pools – evaporation exceeds
precipitation
Barnacles
Barnacles
Mytilus californianus
Nucella (Thais)
Limpets
Starfish - Pisaster
Sea Anemones
Tunicates
Bryozoans
Sea Urchins
Algae
Adaptations – Organisms
1. Minimize water loss/desiccation during
exposure
•
•
•
Hide out in most crack, crevice, under algae
Tolerate tissue desiccation, rehydrate at
high tide
Structural behavioral modifications – close
up, clamp down, mucus, gills in cavity
Adaptations – Organisms
2. Minimize thermal stress
•
•
•
Large size, surface/volume ratio
Light/heat reflection
Evaporative cooling
Adaptations – Organisms
3. Avoid destruction in waves
•
•
•
Attach to substrate
Thicker shells
Clamp to substrate
4. Salinity stress
Conspicuous horizontal banding, or
zonation of organisms
Stephenson & Stephenson 1949
universal scheme to describe
• Supralittoral – splash zone
– Littorina (periwinkle), encrusting lichens and
algae
• Midlittoral – barnacle and mussels zone
• Infralittoral – algae and more diverse mix
of animals
• Sublittoral – subtidal zone
Why?
1. Period of submergence – “critical tidal
level” (Doty 1945)
2. Desiccation – sets upper limits to
organisms
•
•
north vs south-facing slopes
irregularities
3. Thermal stress
4. Sunlight
Joseph Connell 1961
Coast of Scotland:
Chthamalus stellatus
Balanus balanoides
Thais lapillus (now
Nucella)
Robert Paine 1966
• Observed structure of the food web in rocky
•
•
•
•
intertidal from Washington to Costa Rica
Washington – predatory starfish Pisaster and
Nucella, the drill – lots of diversity
Costa Rica – no starfish, the drill Nucella is the
top predator – less species diversity
What was going on??
Went back to Washington and experimented
Paine’s experiments:
• Removed starfish from rocks and observed
results
• With Pisaster ~ 15 species
• Without ~ 8 species (plots dominated by
Mytilus, the best competitor for space)
• Pisaster - “Keystone species” – indirectly
controls the structure of whole community
Connell in California (1970)
• Balanus glandula (like Chthamalus)
• Balanus cariosus
• Refuge in space (Balanus glandula)
• Refuge in size (Balanus cariosus)
Paul Dayton 1971
Space is key – processes involved in getting,
keeping, and using space
• Physical stress – desiccation, etc.
• Physical disturbance – waves, drift logs
• Predation – biological disturbance
• Competition
• Natural death
Dayton’s experiments:
• Fucus – whip effect on barnacles vs protection
from desiccation
– Treatment = removal of Fucus
• Limpets – eat algae; disturb and/or eat
barnacles
– Treatment = “dog dishes” to exclude limpets
• Thais – drills mussels and barnacles
– Treatment = cages to exclude
• Pisaster – eats mussels and barnacles, etc.
– Treatment = removal
Dayton’s conclusions:
• Sessile marine organisms compete for
space
• Three levels of “biological disturbance”
– Grazing by limpets
– Predation by Thais/Nucella
– Predation by Pisaster
• Pattern in nature = mosaic of disturbance
and recovery; disturbance maintains
patchiness, keeps diversity high
Impact of Connell, Paine, and
Dayton’s work on field of ecology
• Shift in thinking about how communities are
•
•
organized
Earlier view – competitive dominant has
broadest niche, diversity the result of
specialization to avoid competition
New view – dominants often less abundant,
inferior competitors can have broader niche,
predators and disturbance create diversity by
preventing competition
Rocky Intertidal Paradigm
1. Upper limits of distribution are primarily determined by
2.
3.
4.
5.
physical factors
Lower limits of distribution are primarily determined by
biological interactions (competition for space and
predation)
Predation or physical disturbance can prevent
competitive exclusion (enhancing species diversity) by
keeping superior competitors at low densities
In benign physical environments, predation is most
important in determining community composition
In harsh physical environments, predation intensity is
reduced and competition is most important in
determining community composition
Exceptions and Limitations of RIP
1. Upper limits of distribution are primarily determined by
physical factors
2. Lower limits of distribution are primarily determined by
biological factors (competition for space and predation)
•
Starvation restricts upper reaches
•
Larval settlement determines the limits of distribution
--
shorter period of inundation means reduced probability of
settlement in upper reaches
-- larvae chose where they settle
-- adult larval interactions affect settlement patterns
Exceptions and Limitations of RIP
4. In benign physical environments, predation is most
important in determining community composition
5. In harsh physical environments, predation intensity is
reduced and competition is most important in
determining community composition
•
Assumes prey have a greater physical tolerance than predator,
can find refuges in space
•
Variations in recruitment determine the level of competition
•
Importance of predator selectivity and competitive hierarchy
•
In same environment, both predation and competition are
important, both for different life stages