Download As can be read from the textbook Fig. 8-9, or... transition has less energy and so a longer wavelength than... 4→3 3→2

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Definition of planet wikipedia , lookup

Corvus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup

History of astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

Geocentric model wikipedia , lookup

International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup

Tropical year wikipedia , lookup

Orrery wikipedia , lookup

Astronomical unit wikipedia , lookup

Solar System wikipedia , lookup

Observational astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup

Astronomical spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems wikipedia , lookup

Hebrew astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Standard solar model wikipedia , lookup

Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Problem 5 (25 points): An astronomer measures the n=4→3 transition of atomic hydrogen in
some star-like object, at the same wavelength as the n=3→2 transition in the laboratory.
a (10 points) Is the object moving towards her or away from her? Explain your reasoning.
As can be read from the textbook Fig. 8-9, or calculated as shown below, the 4→3
transition has less energy and so a longer wavelength than the 3→2 transition.
Therefore λ = λ OBSERVED < λ ACTUAL = λ 0 so the line is blueshifted, that is,
shifted towards shorter wavlengths, so the object is moving towards her.
b (15 points) How fast is the object moving?
The hydrogen line wavelengths are given by
1
1
1
--- = R  ------ – ------
λ
 n 22 n 12
for a n1→n2 transition. Also, since the wavelength shift is rather large, it will be
important to use the relativistic Doppler formula:
1–v⁄c 1⁄2
λ
------ =  ------------------
 1 + v ⁄ c
λ0
(If you used the nonrelativistic formula, you would have found a very large, or nonsensical, velocity, so that should have tipped you off to use the right formula.)
Combining these two gives
1
1
----- – ----1–v⁄c 1⁄2
32 42
------------------ =  ------------------
 1 + v ⁄ c
1
1
----- – ----22 32
8
and a little bit of algebra gives you v ⁄ c = 0.78 or v = 2.3 ×10 m/sec .
Problem 4 (15 points): A hypothetical asteroid executes an elliptical orbit that brings it as far
away from the Sun as Jupiter and as close to the Sun as the Earth. How long does it take to complete one full orbit? You can assume that both the Earth and Jupiter travel around the Sun in circular orbits.
It is a good idea to start with a picture:
The Sun
Asteroid orbit
Jupiter’s orbit
Earth’s orbit
1 AU
5.2 AU
2a
The “length” of the ellipse is twice the semimajor axis a, so
2a = 1 AU + 5.2 AU
a = 3.1 AU
and now we can use Kepler’s Third Law in the simple form
P2 = a3
where a is in AU and the period P is in years, assuming we are orbiting around
something with the mass of the sun. Hence.
P = 3.1 3 ⁄ 2 = 5.46 years
Problem 3 (20 points): The sun radiates energy at the rate of 3.9×1026 J/sec. Assuming the sun is
a uniform spherical mass, how much would the radius have to shrink each year if the radiated
energy were strictly due to gravitational contraction?
This problem is just like our class discussion of energy from Jupiter, and your
homework problem on energy from Saturn. Start with the approximate expression
for the internal potential energy for a spherical, gravitating mass:
GM 2
U ≈ -----------R
and set the luminosity equal to the rate at which this internal energy changes:
GM 2 dR
dU
L = ------- = ------------ ------dt
R 2 dt
where I’m being sloppy with signs, but remembering that the sun must shrink in
order to release energy. Putting in the relevant values for the sun, you find
–7
dR
------- = 7.1 ×10 m/sec = 22.3 m/year
dt
Later on we’ll use this calculation to show that it is impossible for this to be the
source of the sun’s energy. (How big would the sun have been when the dinosaurs
roamed the earth, for example?)
Problem 2 (20 points): Two stars orbit each other and spectral data indicates they are each about
1 kpc = 3.1×1019m away. With a 1 m diameter aperture telescope, the stars can be resolved in
blue light, but they cannot be resolved in red light. Estimate the distance between the two stars.
The object can be resolved if the wavelength is as short as ≈400 nm, but not if the
wavelength is as long as ≈700 nm. To estimate the distance between the stars, based
on diffraction limited resolution, pick a wavelength in the middle, say 550 nm.
The resolving angle is therefore
–7
λ
θ RES = 1.22 --- = 6.7 ×10
d
The actual angular separation between the two stars is
R
R
θ SIZE = ---- = ---------------------------19
D
3.1 ×10 m
Setting these two angles equal, you find
13
R = 2.1 ×10
m = 140 AU
This is a perfectly reasonable separation for a binary star system.
NOTE: A lot of people made the mistake of using their calculator to get the sine or
tangent of an angle, but left the calculator in “degrees” instead of radians. You
should remember that this is never necessary for problems like this. If the angle is
small and expressed in radians, its sine and tangent are both equal to the angle.
Problem 1 (20 points): Our sun is located about 8.5 kpc = 2.6×1020 m from the center of our galaxy, where most of the galactic mass (about 7×1011 solar masses) is concentrated. Assuming the
sun executes circular orbits about the galactic center, how long does it take to make a round trip?
This is a straightforward application of our work on circular orbits. Starting with
F=ma for an object moving in a circle under the influence of gravity from a much
larger object, we have
v2
1 2πR 2
GMm
-------------- = m ----- = m ---  ----------
R
R T 
R2
which leads to the equation
R3 1 ⁄ 2
T = 2π  ---------
 GM 
where M=7×1011×1.99×1030 kg and R is given above. The other numbers can be
looked up in the textbook appendices. You find
T = 2.7 ×10
15
sec = 86 Myr
We’ll be returning to this when we talk about the structure of our Galaxy, including
spiral arm structure and the evidence for “dark matter”.
Exam #1
79205 Astronomy
Fall 1997
NAME:
Solution Key
You have two hours to complete this exam. There are a total of five problems and you are
to solve all of them. Not all the problems are worth the same number of points.
You may use Introductory Astronomy and Astrophysics (Zeilik & Gregory), Astronomy:
The Evoloving Universe ( Zeilik), and class notes and handouts, or other books. You may not
share these resources with another student during the test.
Indicate any figures or tables you use in your calculations. Show all Work!
GOOD LUCK!
Problem
Score
Worth
1.
20
2.
20
3.
20
4.
15
5.
25
Total Score:
100