* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Xiao Yang Xia
Survey
Document related concepts
Gamma-ray burst wikipedia , lookup
Hubble Deep Field wikipedia , lookup
Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Corvus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Hawking radiation wikipedia , lookup
Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Observational astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Malmquist bias wikipedia , lookup
Nebular hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
IR QSOs at low and high redshift X.Y.Xia Tianjin Normal University, China Collaborators: C.N.Hao, S.Mao, H.Wu & Z.G.Deng Motivation • The tight correlation between Mbh and σof host galaxy Kommendy&Gebhardt 2001, Merritt & Ferrarese 2001 • The relation of SFR/Mdot vs. Mbh Heckman & Kauffmann 2004 • IR QSO is ideal laboratory for study such process-coeval of starburst and BH growing Heckman & Kauffman, 2004, based on 23000 SDSS narrow emission line AGN Motivation • The tight correlation between Mbh and σof host galaxy Kommendy&Gebhardt 2001, Merritt & Ferrarese 2001 • The relation of SFR/Mdot vs. Mbh Heckman & Kauffmann 2004 • IR QSO is ideal laboratory for study such process--coeval of starburst and BH growing Transition stage from merger to ellipticals IR QSOs are in transitionary stage • Strong FeII emitters • High Eddington ratio • Steep x-ray slop at one extreme end of Eigenvecgtor 1 and they are young QSOs • Starburst Key point • The starburst and central AGN give main contributions at different waveband • By comparing optical and IR QSOs sample, It is possible to separate the contributions • Determining SFR and Mdot IR QSOs at Low redshift (1) IR QSO sample Zheng et al. (2002) (2) The optically-selected QSO sample PG QSOs , BG92 (1992), Haas et al. (2003) (3) NLS1 sample Wang & Lu (2001) Sample Selection • QDOT IRAS galaxy sample (Lawrence et al. 1999) • 1 Jy ULIRGs sample (Kim & Sanders 1998) • IRAS-ROSAT cross-identification sample (Moran et al. 1996) A sample of 31 IR QSOs (z<0.35),takes a fraction of about 25% in local universe. Based on the sample, statistical results should be representative. Estimation of physical parameters at low z M BH (1) Black hole mass: RBLRV 2 G Lbol 9L (5100 A) (2) Bolometric luminosity: (3) Accretion rate: (Kaspi et al. 2000) Lbol M C2 SFR 6.52M sun yr (4) Star formation rate: (Kaspi et al. 2000) (Peterson 1997) 1 L60m 1010 Lsun (Kennicutt 1998; Lawrence et al. 1989; Cardiel et al. 2003) SFR M sun yr 1 0.29 M 588.8 1 M sun yr Heckman & Kauffman, 2004, based on 23000 SDSS narrow emission line galaxies High-z QSOs Current available data at radio, UV and Xray show No any difference between low-z and high-z QSOs High-z QSOs The sample (1) Optically selected QSOs at redshift about 4 with 1.2mm observation, Omont et al. (2001) (2) Optically selected QSOs at redshift about 4 with 1.2mm observation, Carilli et al. (2001) (3) Optically selected QSOs at redshift about 2 with 1.2mm observation, Omont et al. (2003) T=41K, ß=1.95 Parameters estimates at high z SFR: Monochromatic luminosity at 60m the monochromatic luminosity at 60m from the flux density at 1.2mm by assuming the rest-frame FIR SED can be described by a greybody spectrum with the dust temperature of 41K and the dust emissivity of 1.95 Priddey & McMahon (2001). Mdot: Bolometric luminosity Vestergaard (2004 ) Lbol 9.74 LB QSOs Narrow emission Line AGN Summary • IR QSOs (at both low and high redshift) are ideal laboratory for study the starburst and black hole growing process extending sample • The relation of SFR/Mdot with Mbh may indicate the strong outflow from central AGN for bright QSOs Conclusions (1) The optical emission of both infrared and optically selected QSOs and NLS1s is mainly from the central AGN, the infrared excess, especially farinfrared excess of IR QSOs should come from starbursts. (2) Star formation rate and accretion rate onto the central BH in IR QSOs at low redshift follow Mbulge- MBH relation, i.e., the ratio of the star formation rate and the accretion rate is about several hundred for IR QSOs, but decreases with the central black hole mass. This shows that the tight correlation between the stellar mass and the central black hole mass is preserved in massive starbursts during violent mergers. (3) Similar to IR QSOs at low redshift, the optically selected QSOs detected at mm band at high redshift have far-infrared excess compared to optical AGNs at low redshift, which should be due to the contribution of starbursts heating the dust. (4) The ratio of star formation rate to accretion rate for QSOs at high redshift is typically smaller than that for IR QSOs at low redshift, which hints the relatively faster growth of black holes at early epochs. (4) IR QSOs are accreting and forming stars at the same time. Therefore, it is an ideal laboratory for us to explore the connection between black hole accretion and star formation. We find that the star formation rate and accretion rate in IR QSOs follow the relation: SFR M sun yr 1 0.29 M 588.8 1 M sun yr Notice that the derivation of SFR is from the monochromatic luminosity at 60m due to starbursts, i.e., the contribution from AGN to L(60 m) has been subtracted by assuming IR QSOs follow the same regression relation as optical AGNs (the solid line in Fig. 2c). Log (Lx/LFIR) vs. Hß blueshift Discussion Hß blueshift Outflows Hß blueshift vs. FeII4570/Hß High fraction of strong Fe II emitters Outflows FeII emission Estimation of physical parameters at low z (1) Black hole mass: M BH RBLRV 2 G (Kaspi et al. 2000) (2) Bolometric luminosity: Lbol 9L (5100 A) (Kaspi et al. 2000) (3) Accretion rate: Lbol M C2 (4) Star formation rate: SFR 6.52M sun yr (Peterson 1997) 1 L60m 1010 Lsun (Kennicutt 1998; Lawrence et al. 1989; Cardiel et al. 2003) Heckman & Kauffman, 2004, based on 23000 SDSS narrow emission line galaxies